Overview authors rarely defined systematic reviews that are included in their overviews

Descripción del Articulo

Objectives: To report systematic review definitions that are published in overviews of reviews and to propose a new classification of systematic reviews. Study Design and Setting: In this review of overviews, we searched PubMed for systematic review definitions that were reported in overviews of rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Diaz Cavero, Karla Tatiana
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista
Repositorio:UPSJB-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.upsjb.edu.pe:upsjb/2822
Enlace del recurso:http://repositorio.upsjb.edu.pe/handle/upsjb/2822
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Meta-analysis
Methods
Research design
Bias
Overview
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: To report systematic review definitions that are published in overviews of reviews and to propose a new classification of systematic reviews. Study Design and Setting: In this review of overviews, we searched PubMed for systematic review definitions that were reported in overviews of reviews that were published in the medical literature between November 2017 and May 2018. Two independent authors extracted and descriptively reported the systematic review definitions from the overviews. The definitions were evaluated regarding whether the concepts of comprehensiveness and reproducibility were incorporated into them, as suggested by some published systematic review definitions. Results: Initially, 138 documents were retrieved, and 111 overviews and protocols of overviews were included. Eight (8%) overviews explicitly reported a systematic review definition, whereas 25 (24%) overviews reported heterogeneous information about the criteria that were used to include systematic reviews in the overviews. Seventy-two (68%) overviews did not report any definition/criteria for including a systematic review. Two (2%) overviews reported a definition based on reproducibility, and none of the overviews reported the need to search for grey and unpublished literature for a review to be considered systematic. Conclusion: Overview authors rarely define systematic reviews that are included in their overviews and the few that do include a definition that provides heterogeneous criteria. 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).