LA PRUEBA DE OFICIO EN EL PROCESO DE AMPARO AMBIENTAL

Descripción del Articulo

The objective of this research work was to determine the way in which the ex officio evidence provided by the Peruvian Constitutional Court contributes to the effectiveness of the amparo process in environmental matters. Due to the precarious regulation of the proof ex officio in the Constitutional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Grados Vega, Grobert Yampier
Formato: tesis de grado
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Repositorio:UNITRU-Tesis
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:dspace.unitru.edu.pe:20.500.14414/10997
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14414/10997
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Proceso de amparo
Tribunal Constitucional
Prueba de oficio
Código Procesal Civil
Descripción
Sumario:The objective of this research work was to determine the way in which the ex officio evidence provided by the Peruvian Constitutional Court contributes to the effectiveness of the amparo process in environmental matters. Due to the precarious regulation of the proof ex officio in the Constitutional Procedural Code, as well as the little doctrinal development of the subject, we have resorted to the general doctrine of ex officio proof and to the regulation that makes it the Civil Procedure Code to unravel the aspects that are applicable to the amparo process. Likewise, the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court in environmental matters has contributed to highlight the particular characteristics of the fundamental right to the environment, as well as the influence of this in the configuration of the environmental protection process, which requires the establishment of special rules in its processing and resolution. In the present investigation it has been possible to determine that the Constitutional Court in most of the environmental protection proceedings in which it has the application of the ex officio evidence, does so assuming wrong criteria, such as that it can order the judge of first instance to exercise its probative powers, and how to directly exercise its own probative powers but violating the exceptionality limit, criteria that do not contribute to the effective protection of the fundamental right to the environment, since they violate the right of defense, and generate unnecessary, unjustified and exaggerated delays in the process, which can trigger irreparable damage.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).