Validity and factorial invariance of the general well-being index (Who-5 wbi) in peruvian university students
Descripción del Articulo
Introduction: Owing to its importance in the development and evaluation of health policies in favor of the general population, there is currently a greater interest in the study of well-being. Therefore, a valid and reliable measurement of well-being is necessary. In this context, this study evaluat...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
| Institución: | Universidad Continental |
| Repositorio: | CONTINENTAL-Institucional |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.continental.edu.pe:20.500.12394/10025 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12394/10025 https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.9797 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Bienestar subjetivo Confiabilidad Invarianza factorial Validez https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.02.02 |
| Sumario: | Introduction: Owing to its importance in the development and evaluation of health policies in favor of the general population, there is currently a greater interest in the study of well-being. Therefore, a valid and reliable measurement of well-being is necessary. In this context, this study evaluated the evidence of validity based on the internal structure, reliability, and factor invariance by sex of the General Well- Being Index (who-5 wbi). Materials and Methods: A total of 499 university students (female = 271; male = 228) from the city of Trujillo, Peru, participated in the study. A confirmatory factor analysis, reliability by internal consistency, and factor invariance by sex were performed using a multigroup analysis. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 5-dimensional model with 5 correlated errors of items 1 and 4 presented a good fit (χ2 = 9.667 [gl = 4], p > 0.05; χ2/gl = 2.416; cfi = 0.994; rmsea = 0.053 [ic90% 0.006–0.097]; srmr = 0.018). In addition, acceptable reliability (ω = 0.758) and factor invariance by sex were reported. Conclusion: The who-5 wbi demonstrated empirical evidence in favor of validity based on internal structure, reliability of scores, and factor invariance that allow for a useful and rapid instrument for measuring subjective well-being in university students. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).