Calistenia constitucional: una futura integración del Acuerdo de Escazú con el derecho constitucional peruano

• Autor: Gamboa Balbín, César
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2024
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: PUCP-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/199885
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/28870/26425; https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202401.001
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Derechos ambientales; Constitución Ecológica; Desarrollo sostenible; Participación ciudadana; Acceso a la información; Acceso a la justicia; Defensores ambientales; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01

This article analyzes the constitutional implications of the future validity of the Escazú Agreement (Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean) in the legal Peruvian system. Second, this article analyzes whether there is consistency between the content of this regional treaty on environmental procedural rights and what is prescribed by the Constitution of Peru. This implies analyzing a series of constitutional principles associated with the Ecological Constitution, the principle of sustainability, the fundamental right to enjoy a healthy environment and the constitutional design of state environmental tasks. Through a documentary analysis of normative, jurisprudential and doctrinal sources on environmental matters, environmental procedural rights are described and their consistency at the level of constitutional regulation with other constitutional goods, such as economic freedoms, is analyzed. Finally, Peru faces various political challenges to improve the public management of its natural resources and thereby define its own model of environmental democracy. In this sense, the Escazú Agreement represents a challenge as well as an opportunity to give greater legitimacy to the planning of public decisions on ecosystems and the use of natural resources, and thereby avoid a possible impact on the fundamental right to a healthy environment.