Relaciones tóxicas: la insoportable tensión entre las cláusulas de estabilización, la soberanía estatal y los Derechos Humanos bajo el derecho internacional

• Autores: Núñez del Prado, Fabio, Simó García, Eugenia
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2020
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: PUCP-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/176085
• Enlace del recurso: http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/23498/22476; http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/23498/22513; https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202001.027
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Cláusulas de estabilización; Cláusula de congelación; Cláusula de equilibrio económico; Derecho de inversiones; Inversión; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01

Large-scale investments depend on various economic, natural and social factors of the State where they invest. Also, from an economic point of view, once the investment has been made, the financial viability of the project depends, to a large extent, on the investor’s ability to capture cash flows. However, investors will always be at some degree of risk.In this article, the authors examine whether Stabilization Clauses, a widely used risk management device in investment contracts, can affect a State’s action in implementing its international human rights and environmental obligations. Specifically, they assess whether Stabilisation Clauses can limit the application and creation of new social or environmental regulations to investment activities during the life of the investment.