La eficacia personal del convenio colectivo de trabajo: Idas y venidas sobre la extensión unilateral del convenio colectivo a los trabajadores no sindicalizados

• Autores: Boza Pró, Guillermo, Briones Zegarra, Joaquín
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2024
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: PUCP-Institucional
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/203669
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/30768/27314; https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/203669; https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202401.005
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Unilateral extension of collective agreement; Freedom of association; Principle of equal treatment; Union representation; Supreme Court; Labour Inspection Court of the National Superintendence of Labour Inspection; Extensión unilateral del convenio colectivo; Libertad sindical; Principio de igualdad; Representación sindical; Corte Suprema; Tribunal de Fiscalización Laboral de la SUNAFIL; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00

The unilateral extension of the collective agreement has been widely discussed by Peruvian doctrine and jurisprudence for more than a decade. Aside from this, it maintains its validity to the extent that there is still a contrast in positions between two decision-making bodies of the Peruvian labor legal system. This article addresses the topic with the purpose of establishing a position on the debate, developing its analysis in three sections. Firstly, basic issues relating to the collective agreement as a bargaining product, its legal effectiveness and its personal effectiveness related to the criterion of greater representativeness are reviewed. Secondly, the jurisprudential evolution that the topic has had in the decisions of the Supreme Court, such as those of the Labour Inspection Court of the National Superintendence of Labour Inspection, is detailed; in such a way that the authors mark their position on the arguments outlined in each case. Next, a rarely touched upon aspect of the theme is developed; that is, the possibility for non-unionized workers to retain the benefits unilaterally extended by the employer. The article ends with some brief conclusions on what has been reflected.