Level of Cognitive Biases of Representativeness and Confirmation in Psychology Students of three Bío-Bío Universities

Descripción del Articulo

Cognitive biases are unreasonable ways of making decisions, often in a one-sided way. The objective of this research was to describe the level of representativeness and confirmation biases in Chilean psychology students, in order to know how this phenomenon occurs. The participants were 198 psycholo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Castro M., Alexandra, Hernández A., Zabrina, Riquelme M., Elisa, Ossa C., Carlos, Aedo S., Jaime, Da Costa D., Silvia, Páez R., Darío
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/245
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/245
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Sesgos
Cognición
Formación profesional
Psicología
Biases
Cognition
Professional Training
Psychology
Descripción
Sumario:Cognitive biases are unreasonable ways of making decisions, often in a one-sided way. The objective of this research was to describe the level of representativeness and confirmation biases in Chilean psychology students, in order to know how this phenomenon occurs. The participants were 198 psychology students from three universities in southern Chile. The instrument was based on two cognitive tasks derived from Kanheman and Tversky. The data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and mean differences. The results indicate a high level of biases in the groups of students, in the two tasks evaluated; the representativeness bias presents differences among universities only in sub-task 1, as well as in task 2, related to confirmation bias. Likewise, there are differences in representation bias according to age and sex. The need to strengthen reasoning skills in the initial training of future psychologists, in order to improve skills related to decision making in the professional field is concluded.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).