Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Psychometric Properties in Peruvian Universities
Descripción del Articulo
The purpose of this instrumental design study was to analyze the psychometric evidence of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) for its application in university students in Metropolitan Lima. A total of 520 students participated, 292 women (56%) and 228 men (44%), between 1...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2023 |
| Institución: | Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| Lenguaje: | español inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/1874 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1874 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | MSPSS Scale Perceived social support University students Psychometric properties Escala MSPSS Apoyo social percibido Estudiantes universitarios Propiedades psicométricas |
| id |
REVUSIL_c9f425f61b8cb90bd660c805899177f3 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/1874 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUSIL |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Psychometric Properties in Peruvian Universities Escala Multidimensional de Apoyo Social Percibido (MSPSS): propiedades psicométricas en universitarios peruanos |
| title |
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Psychometric Properties in Peruvian Universities |
| spellingShingle |
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Psychometric Properties in Peruvian Universities Nicho Almonacid , Tracy Lucyana MSPSS Scale Perceived social support University students Psychometric properties Escala MSPSS Apoyo social percibido Estudiantes universitarios Propiedades psicométricas |
| title_short |
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Psychometric Properties in Peruvian Universities |
| title_full |
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Psychometric Properties in Peruvian Universities |
| title_fullStr |
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Psychometric Properties in Peruvian Universities |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Psychometric Properties in Peruvian Universities |
| title_sort |
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Psychometric Properties in Peruvian Universities |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Nicho Almonacid , Tracy Lucyana Melendrez Ugarte , Dayanna Solange Palacios-Mizare , Maria Georgina Arias-Gutierrez , Midory Olivas Ugarte, Lincol Orlando |
| author |
Nicho Almonacid , Tracy Lucyana |
| author_facet |
Nicho Almonacid , Tracy Lucyana Melendrez Ugarte , Dayanna Solange Palacios-Mizare , Maria Georgina Arias-Gutierrez , Midory Olivas Ugarte, Lincol Orlando |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Melendrez Ugarte , Dayanna Solange Palacios-Mizare , Maria Georgina Arias-Gutierrez , Midory Olivas Ugarte, Lincol Orlando |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
MSPSS Scale Perceived social support University students Psychometric properties Escala MSPSS Apoyo social percibido Estudiantes universitarios Propiedades psicométricas |
| topic |
MSPSS Scale Perceived social support University students Psychometric properties Escala MSPSS Apoyo social percibido Estudiantes universitarios Propiedades psicométricas |
| description |
The purpose of this instrumental design study was to analyze the psychometric evidence of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) for its application in university students in Metropolitan Lima. A total of 520 students participated, 292 women (56%) and 228 men (44%), between 18 and 61 years of age (M = 24.89, SD = 5.17). The confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable values for the bifactor model: χ2/gl = 4.645, CFI = .99, TLI = .98, SRMR = .027, RMSEA = .084 (90% C.I., .072, .096) and WRMR = .99. Additionally, a value of H = .945, PUC = .727, ECV = .695 and the ωH = .85 were obtained for the general factor. Convergent validity was examined with the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) (r = .50; r2 = .25) and divergent validity with the Test Anxiety Inventory-State (TAI-State) (r = -.32; r2 = .10). In addition, reliability was determined through the ordinal omega coefficient for the general scale (ω = .97) and its three factors respectively: (ω = .90), (ω = .96) and (ω = .93). Finally, the factorial invariance analysis showed evidence of fairness by sex (ΔCFI<.010, ΔRMSEA <.015). In conclusion, the MSPSS has adequate psychometric properties to quantify the variable perceived social support in Lima university students. |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-31 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1874 10.20511/pyr2023.v11n3.1874 |
| url |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1874 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.20511/pyr2023.v11n3.1874 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa eng |
| language |
spa eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1874/1844 https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1874/1846 https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1874/1860 https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1874/1861 /*ref*/Aneshensel, C. S. (1992). Social stress: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.000311 /*ref*/Arechabala, M. C., & Miranda, C. (2002). Validación de una escala de Apoyo Social percibido en un grupo de adultos mayores adscritos a un programa de hipertensión en la región metropolitana. Ciencia y Enfermería, 8(1), 49-55. https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/cienf/v8n1/art07.pdf /*ref*/Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 /*ref*/Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282013000300043&lng=es /*ref*/Awang, M. M., Kutty, F. M., & Ahmad, A. R. (2014). Perceived social support and well being: First-year student experience in university. International Education Studies, 7(13), 261–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p261 /*ref*/Baessler, J., & Schwarzer, R. (1996). Evaluación de la autoeficacia: adaptación española de la Escala de Autoeficacia general. Ansiedad y Estrés, 2(1), 1–8. /*ref*/Bauermeister, J. J., Collazo, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (1983). The construction and validation of the Spanish Form of the Test Anxiety Inventory: Inventario de Auto-Evaluación Sobre Exámenes (IDASE). Series in Clinical & Community Psychology: Stress & Anxiety, 2, 67–85. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1984-16327-001 /*ref*/Bohórquez, C., & Rodríguez-Cárdenas, D. E. (2014). Percepción de amistad en adolescentes: el papel de las redes sociales. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 23(2), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v23n2.37359 /*ref*/Broadhead, W. E., Gehlbach, S. H., De Gruy, F. V., & Kaplan, B. H. (1988). The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Medical Care, 26(7), 709-723. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198807000-00006 /*ref*/Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press. http://www.kharazmi-statistics.ir/Uploads/Public/book/Methodology%20in%20the%20Social%20Sciences.pdf /*ref*/Bueno-Pacheco, A., Lima-Castro, S., Peña-Contreras, E., Cedillo-Quizhpe, C., y Aguilar-Sizer, M. (2018). Adaptación al Español de la Escala de Autoeficacia General para su Uso en el Contexto Ecuatoriano. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, 48(3), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP48.3.01 /*ref*/Calderón, C., Ferrando, P. J., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Gómez-Sánchez, D., Fernández-Montes, A., Palacín-Lois, M., Antoñanzas-Basa, M., Rogado, J., Manzano-Fernández, A., Ferreira, E., Asensio-Martínez, E., & Jiménez-Fonseca, P. (2021). Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) in Cancer Patients: Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance. Psicothema, 33(1), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.263 /*ref*/Campo-Arias, A., & Oviedo, H. C. (2008). Propiedades psicométricas de una escala: la consistencia interna. Revista de Salud Pública, 10(5), 831-839. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/422/42210515.pdf /*ref*/Caycho, T. (2017). Importancia del análisis de invarianza factorial en estudios comparativos en ciencias de la salud. Educación Médica Superior, 31(2). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412017000200004 /*ref*/Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 14(3), 464-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 /*ref*/Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 /*ref*/Chou, K. L. (2000). Assessing Chinese adolescents’ social support: The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00098-7 /*ref*/Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2a ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates /*ref*/Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B. H. & Underwood, L. G. (2000). Social Relationships and Health. En S. Cohen, LG Underwood y BH Gottlieb (Eds.), Social Support Measurement and Intervention: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists (pp. 3–25). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.003.0001 /*ref*/Cohen, S. (2004). Social Relationships and Health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676 /*ref*/Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 /*ref*/Conley, C. S., Kirsch, A. C., Dickson, D. A., & Bryant, F. B. (2014). Negotiating the transition to college: Developmental trajectories and gender differences in psychological functioning, cognitive-affective strategies, and social well-being. Emerging Adulthood, 2(3), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696814521808 /*ref*/Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assesment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868 /*ref*/De las Cuevas, C., & González de Rivera, J. (1992). Autoinformes y respuestas sesgadas. Anales de Psiquiatría, 8(9), 362-366. http://psicoter.es/_arts/92_A109_09.pdf /*ref*/Denis, A., Callahan, S., & Bouvard, M. (2015). Evaluation of the French version of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support during the postpartum period. Maternal and child health journal, 19(6), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1630-9 /*ref*/DiStefano, C., Liu, J., Jiang, N., & Shi, D. (2017). Examination of the weighted root mean square residual: Evidence for trustworthiness? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 453-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1390394 /*ref*/Dominguez, S. (2013). ¿Ítems politómicos o dicotómicos? Un estudio empírico con una escala unidimensional. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5(3), 30-37. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3334/333430131005.pdf /*ref*/Dominguez-Lara, S., & Rodriguez, A. (2017). Índices estadísticos de modelos bifactor. Interacciones, 3(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.24016/2017.v3n2.51 /*ref*/Dueber, D. M. (2017). Bifactor Indices Calculator: A Microsoft Excel-based tool to calculate various indices relevant to bifactor CFA models. https://doi.org/10.13023/edp.tool.01 /*ref*/Escobedo, M. T., Hernández, J. A., Estebané, V., & Martínez, G. (2016). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales: características, fases, construcción, aplicación y resultados. Ciencia & Trabajo, 18(55), 16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-24492016000100004 /*ref*/Fan, X., & Lu, M. (2019). Testing the effect of perceived social support on left-behind children’s mental well-being in mainland China: the mediation role of resilience. Children and Youth Services Review, 109(2020), 104695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104695 /*ref*/Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015). A new look at social support: a theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 113-147. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1088868314544222 /*ref*/Fernández, A. (2015). Aplicación del análisis factorial confirmatorio a un modelo de medición del rendimiento académico en lectura. Ciencias Económicas, 33(2), 39-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rce.v33i2.22216 /*ref*/Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/778/77812441003.pdf /*ref*/Flores-Flores, O., Lajo-Arauzo, Y., Zevallos-Morales, A., Rondán, P. L., Lizaraso-Soto, F., & Jorquiera, T. (2017). Análisis psicométrico de un cuestionario para medir el ambiente educativo en una muestra de estudiantes de medicina en Perú. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica, 34(2), 255-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2017.342.2642 /*ref*/Guo, S., Tian, D., Wang, X., Xiao, Y., He, H., Qu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2015). Protective Effects of Social Support Content and Support Source on Depression and Its Prevalence 6 Months after Wenchuan Earthquake. Stress and health: journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 31(5), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2563 /*ref*/Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sorbom (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Present and future (195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. /*ref*/Harikandei, H. (2017). Relationship between perceived social support, mental health and life satisfaction in MSc students of physical education. International Journal of Sports Science, 7(4), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.sports.20170704.01 /*ref*/Hernández, A., Ramos, M., Placencia, B., Indacochea, B., Quimis, A., & Moreno, L. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Editorial Área de Innovación y Desarrollo, S.L. /*ref*/Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 /*ref*/Juárez-García, A., Merino-Soto, C., & Neri, J. (2018). Adaptación y validez de la Escala de personalidad tipo D (DS-14) en una muestra mexicana. Liberabit, 24(2), 321-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2018.v24n2.11 /*ref*/Karaca, A., Yildirim, N., Cangur, S., Acikgoz, F., & Akkus, D. (2019). Relationship between mental health of nursing students and coping, self-esteem and social support. Nurse Education Today, 76, 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.01.029 /*ref*/Li, J., Han, X., Wang, W., Sun, G., & Cheng, Z. (2018). How social support influences university students. academic achievement and emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of self-esteem. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.016 /*ref*/Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tómas-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361 /*ref*/López-Angulo, Y., Pérez-Villalobos, M., Bernardo, A., Sáez, F., & Diaz-Mujica, A. (2021). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala Multidimensional de Apoyo Social Percibido en estudiantes universitarios chilenos. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, 1(58), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP58.11 /*ref*/Lourel, M., Hartmann, A., Closon, C., Mouda, F., & Petric-Tatu, O. (2013). Social support and health: An overview of selected theoretical models for adaptation. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. /*ref*/Magrin, M. E., D'Addario, M., Greco, A., Miglioretti, M., Sarini, M., Scrignaro, M., Steca, P., Vecchio, L., & Crocetti, E. (2015). Social support and adherence to treatment in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis. Annals of behavioral medicine: a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 49(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9663-2 /*ref*/Maymon, R., Hall, N. C., & Harley, J. M. (2019). Supporting first-year students during the transition to higher education: The importance of quality and source of received support for student well-being. Student Success, 10(3), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i3.1407 /*ref*/Meehan, C., & Howells, K. (2017). What really matters to freshers?: Evaluation of first year student experience of transition into university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(7), 893–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1323194 /*ref*/Mishra, S. (2020). Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’ students. Educational Research Review, 29, 100307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100307 /*ref*/Moller, C. I., Cotton, S. M., Badcock, P. B., Hetrick, S. E., Berk, M., Dean, O. M., Chanen, A. M., & Davey, C. G. (2021). Relationships Between Different Dimensions of Social Support and Suicidal Ideation in Young People with Major Depressive Disorder. Journal of affective disorders, 281, 714–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.085 /*ref*/Mondragón B., M. A. (2014). Uso de la correlación de Spearman en un estudio de intervención en fisioterapia. Movimiento Científico, 8(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.33881/2011-7191.mct.08111 /*ref*/Montoya, E., Puerta, E., Hernández, D., Páez, E., & Sánchez, I. (2016). Disponibilidad y efectividad de relaciones significativas: elementos claves para promover resiliencia en jóvenes. Index de Enfermería, 25(1-2), 22-26. http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962016000100006&lng=es&tlng=es. /*ref*/Novoa, C., & Barra, E. (2015). Influencia del apoyo social percibido y los factores de personalidad en la satisfacción vital de estudiantes universitarios. Terapia psicológica, 33(3), 239-245. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082015000300007 /*ref*/Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de Muestreo sobre una Población a Estudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35(1), 227-232. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037 /*ref*/Oyarzún, E., & Iriarte, I. (2020). Escala multidimensional de apoyo social percibido en adolescentes chilenos. Liminales. Escritos Sobre Psicología y Sociedad, 9(17), 39-58. http://revistafacso.ucentral.cl/index.php/liminales/article/view/422 /*ref*/Pérez, E., & Medrano, L. (2010). Análisis factorial exploratorio: bases conceptuales y metodológicos. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v2.n1.15924 /*ref*/Pérez, E., & Tornimbeni, S. (2008). Construcción de test. En S. Tomberini, E. Pérez. Y F. Olaz (Eds). Introducción a la psicometría (162-190). Paidos. /*ref*/Poots, A., & Cassidy, T. (2020). Academic expectation, self-compassion, psychological capital, social support and student wellbeing. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00409-1 /*ref*/Qi, M., Zhou, S.-J., Guo, Z.-C., Zhang, L.-G., Min, H.-J., Li, X.-M., & Chen, J.-X. (2020). The Effect of Social Support on Mental Health in Chinese Adolescents During the Outbreak of COVID-19. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(4), 514-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.001 /*ref*/Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2012). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: a bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831 /*ref*/Romm, K. F., Metzger, A., & Turiano, N. A. (2021). Parental Emotional Support and Health Problems: The Role of Social Support and Social Strain. Journal of Adult Development, 28, 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-021-09379-z /*ref*/Saltzman, L. Y., Hansel, T. C., & Bordnick, P. S. (2020). Loneliness, isolation, and social support factors in post-COVID-19 mental health. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, 12(S1), S55–S57. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000703 /*ref*/Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: the social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.127 /*ref*/Shumaker, S. A., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: closing conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 11-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01105.x /*ref*/Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0 /*ref*/Sosu, E. M., & Pheunpha, P. (2019). Trajectory of university dropout: Investigating the cumulative effect of academic vulnerability and proximity to family support. Frontiers in Education, 4(6), 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00006 /*ref*/Spielberger, C. D., Gonzalez, H. P., Taylor, C. J., Algaze, B., & Anton, W. D. (1978). Examination Stress and Test Anxiety. In C. D. Spielberger, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and Anxiety (Vol. 5, pp. 167-191). Hemisphere/Wiley. /*ref*/Stucky, B. D., Orlando, M. O., Vaughan, C. A., Tucker, J. S., & Butler, J. (2013). The psychometric development and initial validation of the DCI-A short form for adolescent therapeutic community treatment process. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46(4), 516-521. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jsat.2013.12.005 /*ref*/Tamargo, E., del Valle, M., González, M., López, L., & Cueto, E. (2006). Validación de un cuestionario para medir factores psicosociales asociados al seguimiento farmacoterapéutico en farmacéuticos españoles. Psicothema, 18(4), 778-784. http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3308.pdf /*ref*/Tough, H., Siegrist, J., & Fekete, C. (2017). Social relationships, mental health and wellbeing in physical disability: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4308-6 /*ref*/Troncoso, C., & Soto-López, N. (2018). Funcionalidad familiar, autovalencia y bienestar psicosocial de adultos mayores. Centro de Investigación en Educación y Desarrollo, 18(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2018.v18n1.04 /*ref*/Uchino, B. N., Uno, D., & Holt-Lunstad, J. (1999). Social support, physiological processes, and health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-8721.00034 /*ref*/Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002 /*ref*/Vargas-Quesada, B., de Moya, F., & Olvera, M. (2002). Enfoques en torno al modelo cognitivo para la recuperación de información: análisis crítico. Ciencia da Información, 31(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652002000200012 /*ref*/van Eerde, W., & Klingsieck, K. B. (2018). Overcoming procrastination? A meta-analysis of intervention studies. Educational Research Review, 25, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.002 /*ref*/Vaux, A., Phillips, J., Holly, L., Thomson, B., Williams, D., & Stewart, D. (1986). The social support appraisals (SS-A) scale: studies of reliability and validity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(2), 195-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00911821 /*ref*/Vega-Angarita, O., & González-Escobar, D. (2009). Apoyo social: Elemento clave en el afrontamiento de la enfermedad crónica. Enfermería Global, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.8.2.66351 /*ref*/Ventura-León, J., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625-627. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/773/77349627039.pdf /*ref*/Ventura-León, J., Barboza-Palomino, M., & Caycho, T. (2017). ¿Son necesarios los instrumentos equitativos? Educación Médica, 19(2), 126-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2017.03.022 /*ref*/Walen, H. R., & Lachman, M. E. (2000). Social support and strain from partner, family, and friends: Costs and benefts for men and women in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500171001 /*ref*/Xerri, M. J., Radford, K., & Shacklock, K. (2017). Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective. Higher Education, 75(4), 589–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0162-9. /*ref*/Zhang, M., Zhang, J., Zhang, F., Zhang, L., & Feng, D. (2018). Prevalence of psychological distress and the effects of resilience and perceived social support among Chinese college students: Does gender make a difference? Psychiatry Research, 267, 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.038 /*ref*/Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 /*ref*/Zinbarg, R. E., Yovel, I., Revelle, W., & McDonald, R. P. (2006). Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale's indicators: a comparison of estimators for ωh. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30(2), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146621605278814 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf text/xml text/xml |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú. |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú. |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023): September - December; e1874 Propósitos y Representaciones; ##issue.vol## 11 ##issue.no## 3 (2023): Setiembre - Diciembre; e1874 Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 11 Núm. 3 (2023): Setiembre - Diciembre; e1874 2310-4635 2307-7999 10.20511/pyr2023.v11n3 reponame:Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola instname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola instacron:USIL |
| instname_str |
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| instacron_str |
USIL |
| institution |
USIL |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1797773193191096320 |
| spelling |
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Psychometric Properties in Peruvian UniversitiesEscala Multidimensional de Apoyo Social Percibido (MSPSS): propiedades psicométricas en universitarios peruanosNicho Almonacid , Tracy Lucyana Melendrez Ugarte , Dayanna Solange Palacios-Mizare , Maria Georgina Arias-Gutierrez , Midory Olivas Ugarte, Lincol OrlandoMSPSS ScalePerceived social supportUniversity studentsPsychometric propertiesEscala MSPSSApoyo social percibidoEstudiantes universitariosPropiedades psicométricasThe purpose of this instrumental design study was to analyze the psychometric evidence of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) for its application in university students in Metropolitan Lima. A total of 520 students participated, 292 women (56%) and 228 men (44%), between 18 and 61 years of age (M = 24.89, SD = 5.17). The confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable values for the bifactor model: χ2/gl = 4.645, CFI = .99, TLI = .98, SRMR = .027, RMSEA = .084 (90% C.I., .072, .096) and WRMR = .99. Additionally, a value of H = .945, PUC = .727, ECV = .695 and the ωH = .85 were obtained for the general factor. Convergent validity was examined with the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) (r = .50; r2 = .25) and divergent validity with the Test Anxiety Inventory-State (TAI-State) (r = -.32; r2 = .10). In addition, reliability was determined through the ordinal omega coefficient for the general scale (ω = .97) and its three factors respectively: (ω = .90), (ω = .96) and (ω = .93). Finally, the factorial invariance analysis showed evidence of fairness by sex (ΔCFI<.010, ΔRMSEA <.015). In conclusion, the MSPSS has adequate psychometric properties to quantify the variable perceived social support in Lima university students.El presente estudio de diseño instrumental tuvo como finalidad analizar las evidencias psicométricas de la Escala Multidimensional de Apoyo Social Percibido (MSPSS) para su aplicación en estudiantes universitarios de Lima Metropolitana. Participaron 520 estudiantes, 292 mujeres (56%) y 228 hombres (44%), entre 18 a 61 años (M = 24.89, DE = 5.17). El análisis factorial confirmatorio mostró valores aceptables para el modelo bifactor: χ2/gl = 4.645, CFI = .99, TLI = .98, SRMR = .027, RMSEA = .084 (90% I.C., .072, .096) y WRMR = .99. Adicionalmente, se obtuvo en el factor general un valor de H = .945, PUC = .727, ECV = .695 y el ωH = .85. La validez convergente se examinó con la Escala de Autoeficacia General (EAG) (r = .50; r2 = .25) y la validez divergente con el inventario de ansiedad ante exámenes-estado (TAI-Estado) (r = -.32; r2 = .10). Además, la confiabilidad se determinó a través del coeficiente omega ordinal para la escala general (ω = .97) y sus tres factores respectivamente: (ω = .90), (ω = .96) y (ω = .93). Finalmente, el análisis de invarianza factorial mostró evidencias de equidad por sexo (ΔCFI<.010, ΔRMSEA <.015). En conclusión, la MSPSS reúne adecuadas propiedades psicométricas para cuantificar la variable apoyo social percibido en universitarios limeños.Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú.2023-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/xmltext/xmlhttps://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/187410.20511/pyr2023.v11n3.1874Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023): September - December; e1874Propósitos y Representaciones; ##issue.vol## 11 ##issue.no## 3 (2023): Setiembre - Diciembre; e1874Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 11 Núm. 3 (2023): Setiembre - Diciembre; e18742310-46352307-799910.20511/pyr2023.v11n3reponame:Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyolainstname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyolainstacron:USILspaenghttps://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1874/1844https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1874/1846https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1874/1860https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/1874/1861/*ref*/Aneshensel, C. S. (1992). Social stress: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.000311/*ref*/Arechabala, M. C., & Miranda, C. (2002). Validación de una escala de Apoyo Social percibido en un grupo de adultos mayores adscritos a un programa de hipertensión en la región metropolitana. Ciencia y Enfermería, 8(1), 49-55. https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/cienf/v8n1/art07.pdf/*ref*/Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469/*ref*/Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282013000300043&lng=es/*ref*/Awang, M. M., Kutty, F. M., & Ahmad, A. R. (2014). Perceived social support and well being: First-year student experience in university. International Education Studies, 7(13), 261–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p261/*ref*/Baessler, J., & Schwarzer, R. (1996). Evaluación de la autoeficacia: adaptación española de la Escala de Autoeficacia general. Ansiedad y Estrés, 2(1), 1–8./*ref*/Bauermeister, J. J., Collazo, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (1983). The construction and validation of the Spanish Form of the Test Anxiety Inventory: Inventario de Auto-Evaluación Sobre Exámenes (IDASE). Series in Clinical & Community Psychology: Stress & Anxiety, 2, 67–85. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1984-16327-001/*ref*/Bohórquez, C., & Rodríguez-Cárdenas, D. E. (2014). Percepción de amistad en adolescentes: el papel de las redes sociales. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 23(2), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v23n2.37359/*ref*/Broadhead, W. E., Gehlbach, S. H., De Gruy, F. V., & Kaplan, B. H. (1988). The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Medical Care, 26(7), 709-723. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198807000-00006/*ref*/Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press. http://www.kharazmi-statistics.ir/Uploads/Public/book/Methodology%20in%20the%20Social%20Sciences.pdf/*ref*/Bueno-Pacheco, A., Lima-Castro, S., Peña-Contreras, E., Cedillo-Quizhpe, C., y Aguilar-Sizer, M. (2018). Adaptación al Español de la Escala de Autoeficacia General para su Uso en el Contexto Ecuatoriano. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, 48(3), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP48.3.01/*ref*/Calderón, C., Ferrando, P. J., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Gómez-Sánchez, D., Fernández-Montes, A., Palacín-Lois, M., Antoñanzas-Basa, M., Rogado, J., Manzano-Fernández, A., Ferreira, E., Asensio-Martínez, E., & Jiménez-Fonseca, P. (2021). Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) in Cancer Patients: Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance. Psicothema, 33(1), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.263/*ref*/Campo-Arias, A., & Oviedo, H. C. (2008). Propiedades psicométricas de una escala: la consistencia interna. Revista de Salud Pública, 10(5), 831-839. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/422/42210515.pdf/*ref*/Caycho, T. (2017). Importancia del análisis de invarianza factorial en estudios comparativos en ciencias de la salud. Educación Médica Superior, 31(2). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412017000200004/*ref*/Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 14(3), 464-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834/*ref*/Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5/*ref*/Chou, K. L. (2000). Assessing Chinese adolescents’ social support: The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00098-7/*ref*/Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2a ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/*ref*/Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B. H. & Underwood, L. G. (2000). Social Relationships and Health. En S. Cohen, LG Underwood y BH Gottlieb (Eds.), Social Support Measurement and Intervention: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists (pp. 3–25). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.003.0001/*ref*/Cohen, S. (2004). Social Relationships and Health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676/*ref*/Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310/*ref*/Conley, C. S., Kirsch, A. C., Dickson, D. A., & Bryant, F. B. (2014). Negotiating the transition to college: Developmental trajectories and gender differences in psychological functioning, cognitive-affective strategies, and social well-being. Emerging Adulthood, 2(3), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696814521808/*ref*/Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assesment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868/*ref*/De las Cuevas, C., & González de Rivera, J. (1992). Autoinformes y respuestas sesgadas. Anales de Psiquiatría, 8(9), 362-366. http://psicoter.es/_arts/92_A109_09.pdf/*ref*/Denis, A., Callahan, S., & Bouvard, M. (2015). Evaluation of the French version of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support during the postpartum period. Maternal and child health journal, 19(6), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1630-9/*ref*/DiStefano, C., Liu, J., Jiang, N., & Shi, D. (2017). Examination of the weighted root mean square residual: Evidence for trustworthiness? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 453-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1390394/*ref*/Dominguez, S. (2013). ¿Ítems politómicos o dicotómicos? Un estudio empírico con una escala unidimensional. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5(3), 30-37. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3334/333430131005.pdf/*ref*/Dominguez-Lara, S., & Rodriguez, A. (2017). Índices estadísticos de modelos bifactor. Interacciones, 3(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.24016/2017.v3n2.51/*ref*/Dueber, D. M. (2017). Bifactor Indices Calculator: A Microsoft Excel-based tool to calculate various indices relevant to bifactor CFA models. https://doi.org/10.13023/edp.tool.01/*ref*/Escobedo, M. T., Hernández, J. A., Estebané, V., & Martínez, G. (2016). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales: características, fases, construcción, aplicación y resultados. Ciencia & Trabajo, 18(55), 16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-24492016000100004/*ref*/Fan, X., & Lu, M. (2019). Testing the effect of perceived social support on left-behind children’s mental well-being in mainland China: the mediation role of resilience. Children and Youth Services Review, 109(2020), 104695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104695/*ref*/Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015). A new look at social support: a theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 113-147. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1088868314544222/*ref*/Fernández, A. (2015). Aplicación del análisis factorial confirmatorio a un modelo de medición del rendimiento académico en lectura. Ciencias Económicas, 33(2), 39-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rce.v33i2.22216/*ref*/Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/778/77812441003.pdf/*ref*/Flores-Flores, O., Lajo-Arauzo, Y., Zevallos-Morales, A., Rondán, P. L., Lizaraso-Soto, F., & Jorquiera, T. (2017). Análisis psicométrico de un cuestionario para medir el ambiente educativo en una muestra de estudiantes de medicina en Perú. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica, 34(2), 255-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2017.342.2642/*ref*/Guo, S., Tian, D., Wang, X., Xiao, Y., He, H., Qu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2015). Protective Effects of Social Support Content and Support Source on Depression and Its Prevalence 6 Months after Wenchuan Earthquake. Stress and health: journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 31(5), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2563/*ref*/Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sorbom (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Present and future (195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc./*ref*/Harikandei, H. (2017). Relationship between perceived social support, mental health and life satisfaction in MSc students of physical education. International Journal of Sports Science, 7(4), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.sports.20170704.01/*ref*/Hernández, A., Ramos, M., Placencia, B., Indacochea, B., Quimis, A., & Moreno, L. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Editorial Área de Innovación y Desarrollo, S.L./*ref*/Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118/*ref*/Juárez-García, A., Merino-Soto, C., & Neri, J. (2018). Adaptación y validez de la Escala de personalidad tipo D (DS-14) en una muestra mexicana. Liberabit, 24(2), 321-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2018.v24n2.11/*ref*/Karaca, A., Yildirim, N., Cangur, S., Acikgoz, F., & Akkus, D. (2019). Relationship between mental health of nursing students and coping, self-esteem and social support. Nurse Education Today, 76, 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.01.029/*ref*/Li, J., Han, X., Wang, W., Sun, G., & Cheng, Z. (2018). How social support influences university students. academic achievement and emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of self-esteem. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.016/*ref*/Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tómas-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361/*ref*/López-Angulo, Y., Pérez-Villalobos, M., Bernardo, A., Sáez, F., & Diaz-Mujica, A. (2021). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala Multidimensional de Apoyo Social Percibido en estudiantes universitarios chilenos. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, 1(58), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP58.11/*ref*/Lourel, M., Hartmann, A., Closon, C., Mouda, F., & Petric-Tatu, O. (2013). Social support and health: An overview of selected theoretical models for adaptation. Nova Science Publishers, Inc./*ref*/Magrin, M. E., D'Addario, M., Greco, A., Miglioretti, M., Sarini, M., Scrignaro, M., Steca, P., Vecchio, L., & Crocetti, E. (2015). Social support and adherence to treatment in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis. Annals of behavioral medicine: a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 49(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9663-2/*ref*/Maymon, R., Hall, N. C., & Harley, J. M. (2019). Supporting first-year students during the transition to higher education: The importance of quality and source of received support for student well-being. Student Success, 10(3), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i3.1407/*ref*/Meehan, C., & Howells, K. (2017). What really matters to freshers?: Evaluation of first year student experience of transition into university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(7), 893–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1323194/*ref*/Mishra, S. (2020). Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’ students. Educational Research Review, 29, 100307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100307/*ref*/Moller, C. I., Cotton, S. M., Badcock, P. B., Hetrick, S. E., Berk, M., Dean, O. M., Chanen, A. M., & Davey, C. G. (2021). Relationships Between Different Dimensions of Social Support and Suicidal Ideation in Young People with Major Depressive Disorder. Journal of affective disorders, 281, 714–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.085/*ref*/Mondragón B., M. A. (2014). Uso de la correlación de Spearman en un estudio de intervención en fisioterapia. Movimiento Científico, 8(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.33881/2011-7191.mct.08111/*ref*/Montoya, E., Puerta, E., Hernández, D., Páez, E., & Sánchez, I. (2016). Disponibilidad y efectividad de relaciones significativas: elementos claves para promover resiliencia en jóvenes. Index de Enfermería, 25(1-2), 22-26. http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962016000100006&lng=es&tlng=es./*ref*/Novoa, C., & Barra, E. (2015). Influencia del apoyo social percibido y los factores de personalidad en la satisfacción vital de estudiantes universitarios. Terapia psicológica, 33(3), 239-245. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082015000300007/*ref*/Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de Muestreo sobre una Población a Estudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35(1), 227-232. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037/*ref*/Oyarzún, E., & Iriarte, I. (2020). Escala multidimensional de apoyo social percibido en adolescentes chilenos. Liminales. Escritos Sobre Psicología y Sociedad, 9(17), 39-58. http://revistafacso.ucentral.cl/index.php/liminales/article/view/422/*ref*/Pérez, E., & Medrano, L. (2010). Análisis factorial exploratorio: bases conceptuales y metodológicos. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v2.n1.15924/*ref*/Pérez, E., & Tornimbeni, S. (2008). Construcción de test. En S. Tomberini, E. Pérez. Y F. Olaz (Eds). Introducción a la psicometría (162-190). Paidos./*ref*/Poots, A., & Cassidy, T. (2020). Academic expectation, self-compassion, psychological capital, social support and student wellbeing. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00409-1/*ref*/Qi, M., Zhou, S.-J., Guo, Z.-C., Zhang, L.-G., Min, H.-J., Li, X.-M., & Chen, J.-X. (2020). The Effect of Social Support on Mental Health in Chinese Adolescents During the Outbreak of COVID-19. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(4), 514-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.001/*ref*/Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2012). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: a bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831/*ref*/Romm, K. F., Metzger, A., & Turiano, N. A. (2021). Parental Emotional Support and Health Problems: The Role of Social Support and Social Strain. Journal of Adult Development, 28, 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-021-09379-z/*ref*/Saltzman, L. Y., Hansel, T. C., & Bordnick, P. S. (2020). Loneliness, isolation, and social support factors in post-COVID-19 mental health. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, 12(S1), S55–S57. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000703/*ref*/Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: the social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.127/*ref*/Shumaker, S. A., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: closing conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 11-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01105.x/*ref*/Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0/*ref*/Sosu, E. M., & Pheunpha, P. (2019). Trajectory of university dropout: Investigating the cumulative effect of academic vulnerability and proximity to family support. Frontiers in Education, 4(6), 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00006/*ref*/Spielberger, C. D., Gonzalez, H. P., Taylor, C. J., Algaze, B., & Anton, W. D. (1978). Examination Stress and Test Anxiety. In C. D. Spielberger, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and Anxiety (Vol. 5, pp. 167-191). Hemisphere/Wiley./*ref*/Stucky, B. D., Orlando, M. O., Vaughan, C. A., Tucker, J. S., & Butler, J. (2013). The psychometric development and initial validation of the DCI-A short form for adolescent therapeutic community treatment process. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46(4), 516-521. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jsat.2013.12.005/*ref*/Tamargo, E., del Valle, M., González, M., López, L., & Cueto, E. (2006). Validación de un cuestionario para medir factores psicosociales asociados al seguimiento farmacoterapéutico en farmacéuticos españoles. Psicothema, 18(4), 778-784. http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3308.pdf/*ref*/Tough, H., Siegrist, J., & Fekete, C. (2017). Social relationships, mental health and wellbeing in physical disability: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4308-6/*ref*/Troncoso, C., & Soto-López, N. (2018). Funcionalidad familiar, autovalencia y bienestar psicosocial de adultos mayores. Centro de Investigación en Educación y Desarrollo, 18(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2018.v18n1.04/*ref*/Uchino, B. N., Uno, D., & Holt-Lunstad, J. (1999). Social support, physiological processes, and health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-8721.00034/*ref*/Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002/*ref*/Vargas-Quesada, B., de Moya, F., & Olvera, M. (2002). Enfoques en torno al modelo cognitivo para la recuperación de información: análisis crítico. Ciencia da Información, 31(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652002000200012/*ref*/van Eerde, W., & Klingsieck, K. B. (2018). Overcoming procrastination? A meta-analysis of intervention studies. Educational Research Review, 25, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.002/*ref*/Vaux, A., Phillips, J., Holly, L., Thomson, B., Williams, D., & Stewart, D. (1986). The social support appraisals (SS-A) scale: studies of reliability and validity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(2), 195-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00911821/*ref*/Vega-Angarita, O., & González-Escobar, D. (2009). Apoyo social: Elemento clave en el afrontamiento de la enfermedad crónica. Enfermería Global, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.8.2.66351/*ref*/Ventura-León, J., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625-627. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/773/77349627039.pdf/*ref*/Ventura-León, J., Barboza-Palomino, M., & Caycho, T. (2017). ¿Son necesarios los instrumentos equitativos? Educación Médica, 19(2), 126-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2017.03.022/*ref*/Walen, H. R., & Lachman, M. E. (2000). Social support and strain from partner, family, and friends: Costs and benefts for men and women in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500171001/*ref*/Xerri, M. J., Radford, K., & Shacklock, K. (2017). Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective. Higher Education, 75(4), 589–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0162-9./*ref*/Zhang, M., Zhang, J., Zhang, F., Zhang, L., & Feng, D. (2018). Prevalence of psychological distress and the effects of resilience and perceived social support among Chinese college students: Does gender make a difference? Psychiatry Research, 267, 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.038/*ref*/Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2/*ref*/Zinbarg, R. E., Yovel, I., Revelle, W., & McDonald, R. P. (2006). Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale's indicators: a comparison of estimators for ωh. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30(2), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146621605278814Derechos de autor 2023 Lincol Olivas-Ugarte, Tracy Lucyana Nicho-Almonacid, Dayanna Solange Melendrez-Ugarte , Maria Georgina Palacios-Mizare , Midory Arias-Gutierrez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/18742024-04-22T15:00:12Z |
| score |
13.97985 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
