Are the Mechanisms for Assessing the Quality of Training for Graduates of the Russian Penitentiary System Perfect?

Descripción del Articulo

The relevance of the study is due to the need to assess the quality of training of graduates of the Russian penitentiary system and the lack of an effective tool to assess the quality and level of training of graduates who have mastered professional educational programs at educational institutions o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rumyantsev, Nikolay V., Shamsunov, Salikh Kh., Bondareva, Olga A.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/800
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/800
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:educational policy
penitentiary system
professional and public accreditation
quality of education
stages of implementation.
id REVUSIL_10fa396cd1067923210ef0efd1bdfb54
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/800
network_acronym_str REVUSIL
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
repository_id_str .
spelling Are the Mechanisms for Assessing the Quality of Training for Graduates of the Russian Penitentiary System Perfect?Rumyantsev, Nikolay V.Shamsunov, Salikh Kh.Bondareva, Olga A.educational policypenitentiary systemprofessional and public accreditationquality of educationstages of implementation.The relevance of the study is due to the need to assess the quality of training of graduates of the Russian penitentiary system and the lack of an effective tool to assess the quality and level of training of graduates who have mastered professional educational programs at educational institutions of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. In this regard, this article is aimed at identifying or disclosing mechanisms for evaluating the quality of educational services by independent experts, representatives of the employer, through professional and public accreditation of educational programs in educational institutions of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. The leading methods to the study of this problem are general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, analogy, generalization, etc.), which to introduce allow a comprehensive review of the procedure for professional and public accreditation of educational programs in the system of the Russian Federation. The article reveals the expected results of introducing the institution of professional public accreditation of educational programs in the Russian penitentiary system: improving the quality of the implemented educational programs, the level of organization of staff training, the quality and relevance of educational services, and the image of departmental services. The materials of the article are of practical value for improving the evaluation system of professional educational programs implemented in educational institutions of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia.Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú.2020-12-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/80010.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE2.800Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; No. SPE2 (2020): Special Number: Educational Psychology Practices in Europe and the Middle East; e800Propósitos y Representaciones; ##issue.no## SPE2 (2020): Número especial: Prácticas de la psicología educativa en Europa y Medio Oriente; e800Propósitos y Representaciones; Núm. SPE2 (2020): Número especial: Prácticas de la psicología educativa en Europa y Medio Oriente; e8002310-46352307-799910.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE2reponame:Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyolainstname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyolainstacron:USILenghttps://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/800/1134Derechos de autor 2020 Propósitos y Representacionesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/8002024-03-13T15:52:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are the Mechanisms for Assessing the Quality of Training for Graduates of the Russian Penitentiary System Perfect?
title Are the Mechanisms for Assessing the Quality of Training for Graduates of the Russian Penitentiary System Perfect?
spellingShingle Are the Mechanisms for Assessing the Quality of Training for Graduates of the Russian Penitentiary System Perfect?
Rumyantsev, Nikolay V.
educational policy
penitentiary system
professional and public accreditation
quality of education
stages of implementation.
title_short Are the Mechanisms for Assessing the Quality of Training for Graduates of the Russian Penitentiary System Perfect?
title_full Are the Mechanisms for Assessing the Quality of Training for Graduates of the Russian Penitentiary System Perfect?
title_fullStr Are the Mechanisms for Assessing the Quality of Training for Graduates of the Russian Penitentiary System Perfect?
title_full_unstemmed Are the Mechanisms for Assessing the Quality of Training for Graduates of the Russian Penitentiary System Perfect?
title_sort Are the Mechanisms for Assessing the Quality of Training for Graduates of the Russian Penitentiary System Perfect?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rumyantsev, Nikolay V.
Shamsunov, Salikh Kh.
Bondareva, Olga A.
author Rumyantsev, Nikolay V.
author_facet Rumyantsev, Nikolay V.
Shamsunov, Salikh Kh.
Bondareva, Olga A.
author_role author
author2 Shamsunov, Salikh Kh.
Bondareva, Olga A.
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv educational policy
penitentiary system
professional and public accreditation
quality of education
stages of implementation.
topic educational policy
penitentiary system
professional and public accreditation
quality of education
stages of implementation.
description The relevance of the study is due to the need to assess the quality of training of graduates of the Russian penitentiary system and the lack of an effective tool to assess the quality and level of training of graduates who have mastered professional educational programs at educational institutions of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. In this regard, this article is aimed at identifying or disclosing mechanisms for evaluating the quality of educational services by independent experts, representatives of the employer, through professional and public accreditation of educational programs in educational institutions of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. The leading methods to the study of this problem are general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, analogy, generalization, etc.), which to introduce allow a comprehensive review of the procedure for professional and public accreditation of educational programs in the system of the Russian Federation. The article reveals the expected results of introducing the institution of professional public accreditation of educational programs in the Russian penitentiary system: improving the quality of the implemented educational programs, the level of organization of staff training, the quality and relevance of educational services, and the image of departmental services. The materials of the article are of practical value for improving the evaluation system of professional educational programs implemented in educational institutions of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/800
10.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE2.800
url https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/800
identifier_str_mv 10.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE2.800
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/800/1134
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2020 Propósitos y Representaciones
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2020 Propósitos y Representaciones
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Carrera de Psicología, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; No. SPE2 (2020): Special Number: Educational Psychology Practices in Europe and the Middle East; e800
Propósitos y Representaciones; ##issue.no## SPE2 (2020): Número especial: Prácticas de la psicología educativa en Europa y Medio Oriente; e800
Propósitos y Representaciones; Núm. SPE2 (2020): Número especial: Prácticas de la psicología educativa en Europa y Medio Oriente; e800
2310-4635
2307-7999
10.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE2
reponame:Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
instname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
instacron:USIL
instname_str Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
instacron_str USIL
institution USIL
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
collection Revistas - Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1794602301544988672
score 13.887878
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).