The challenges of law against the advance of new technologies in assisted human reproduction: A case of surrogate

Descripción del Articulo

The so-called Assisted Human Reproduction Techniques (TERAS) constitute a true technological revolution that is being applied to human life and procreation. The so-called “miracles” of modern science have made it possible to solve one of the problems of greatest concern for the human being: infertil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Rodríguez-Cadilla Ponce, Roxana
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad Ricardo Palma
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/1235
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/1235
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Belly of surrogacy
Belly of solidarity
Belly of rent
Techniques of assisted human reproduction
Filiation
Genetic law
Family law
Bioethics
Bioterrorism
Biojuridic
Biotechnology
Vientre de subrogado
Vientre solidario
Vientre de alquiler
Técnicas de reproducción humana asistida
Filiación
Derecho genético
Derecho de familia
Bioética
Bioderecho
Biojurídica
Biotecnología
id REVURP_b22cfd38d38916204ccc84667adb4e7c
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/1235
network_acronym_str REVURP
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
repository_id_str
spelling The challenges of law against the advance of new technologies in assisted human reproduction: A case of surrogateLos retos del derecho frente al avance de las nuevas tecnologías en reproducción humana asistida: un caso de vientre subrogadoRodríguez-Cadilla Ponce, RoxanaBelly of surrogacyBelly of solidarityBelly of rentTechniques of assisted human reproductionFiliationGenetic lawFamily lawBioethicsBioterrorismBiojuridicBiotechnologyVientre de subrogadoVientre solidarioVientre de alquilerTécnicas de reproducción humana asistidaFiliaciónDerecho genéticoDerecho de familiaBioéticaBioderechoBiojurídicaBiotecnologíaThe so-called Assisted Human Reproduction Techniques (TERAS) constitute a true technological revolution that is being applied to human life and procreation. The so-called “miracles” of modern science have made it possible to solve one of the problems of greatest concern for the human being: infertility. In Peru, there is no specific regulation on these techniques, beyond what is established in Article 7 of the General Health Law; being that the use of TERAS, including the so-called “surrogate belly” are an increasingly frequent reality in our country. The present article raises some reflections on the new challenges that face the right before the new technologies, in the matter of assisted human reproduction; from an amparo process in which the filiation of two minors (twins) procreated through these techniques and with the support of a pregnant-collaborator is discussed. That is to say, a case of “surrogate belly” in the modality of “solidary belly”, whose firm sentence recognizes the motherhood of those who did not bring the ovum, nor carried out the gestation. It is a resolution that declares as a mother, for all its legal and non-legal effects, who had exclusively the will to procreate, proposing a new assumption of affiliation, “affective-social” type, which generates jurisprudence in this matter.Las denominadas Técnicas de Reproducción Humana Asistida (TERAS) constituyen una verdadera revolución tecnológica que viene siendo aplicada a la vida y a la procreación humana. Los llamados “milagros” de la ciencia moderna han permitido dar solución a uno de los problemas de mayor preocupación para el ser humano: la infertilidad. En el Perú, no existe regulación específica sobre estas técnicas, más allá de lo establecido en el artículo 7º de la Ley General de Salud; siendo que el uso de las TERAS, incluido el llamado “vientre subrogado” son una realidad cada vez más frecuente en nuestro país. El presente artículo plantea algunas reflexiones sobre los nuevos retos que enfrenta el derecho ante las nuevas tecnologías, en materia de reproducción humana asistida; a partir de un proceso de amparo en el que se discute la filiación de dos menores (mellizos) procreados por medio de estas técnicas y con el apoyo de una gestante-colaboradora. Es decir, un caso de “vientre subrogado” en la modalidad de “vientre solidario”, cuya sentencia firme reconoce la maternidad de quien no aportó el óvulo, ni llevó a cabo la gestación. Se trata de una resolución que declara como madre, para todos sus efectos legales y no legales, a quien tuvo exclusivamente la voluntad para procrear, planteando un nuevo supuesto de filiación, de tipo “afectivo-social”, que genera jurisprudencia en esta materia.Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado2018-01-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/123510.31381/iusinkarri.vn6.1235Ius Inkarri; Vol. 6 Núm. 6 (2017); 175-1882519-72742410-593710.31381/iusinkarri.vn6reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palmainstname:Universidad Ricardo Palmainstacron:URPspahttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/1235/1127Derechos de autor 2018 Ius Inkarrihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/12352023-10-14T15:35:31Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The challenges of law against the advance of new technologies in assisted human reproduction: A case of surrogate
Los retos del derecho frente al avance de las nuevas tecnologías en reproducción humana asistida: un caso de vientre subrogado
title The challenges of law against the advance of new technologies in assisted human reproduction: A case of surrogate
spellingShingle The challenges of law against the advance of new technologies in assisted human reproduction: A case of surrogate
Rodríguez-Cadilla Ponce, Roxana
Belly of surrogacy
Belly of solidarity
Belly of rent
Techniques of assisted human reproduction
Filiation
Genetic law
Family law
Bioethics
Bioterrorism
Biojuridic
Biotechnology
Vientre de subrogado
Vientre solidario
Vientre de alquiler
Técnicas de reproducción humana asistida
Filiación
Derecho genético
Derecho de familia
Bioética
Bioderecho
Biojurídica
Biotecnología
title_short The challenges of law against the advance of new technologies in assisted human reproduction: A case of surrogate
title_full The challenges of law against the advance of new technologies in assisted human reproduction: A case of surrogate
title_fullStr The challenges of law against the advance of new technologies in assisted human reproduction: A case of surrogate
title_full_unstemmed The challenges of law against the advance of new technologies in assisted human reproduction: A case of surrogate
title_sort The challenges of law against the advance of new technologies in assisted human reproduction: A case of surrogate
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rodríguez-Cadilla Ponce, Roxana
author Rodríguez-Cadilla Ponce, Roxana
author_facet Rodríguez-Cadilla Ponce, Roxana
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Belly of surrogacy
Belly of solidarity
Belly of rent
Techniques of assisted human reproduction
Filiation
Genetic law
Family law
Bioethics
Bioterrorism
Biojuridic
Biotechnology
Vientre de subrogado
Vientre solidario
Vientre de alquiler
Técnicas de reproducción humana asistida
Filiación
Derecho genético
Derecho de familia
Bioética
Bioderecho
Biojurídica
Biotecnología
topic Belly of surrogacy
Belly of solidarity
Belly of rent
Techniques of assisted human reproduction
Filiation
Genetic law
Family law
Bioethics
Bioterrorism
Biojuridic
Biotechnology
Vientre de subrogado
Vientre solidario
Vientre de alquiler
Técnicas de reproducción humana asistida
Filiación
Derecho genético
Derecho de familia
Bioética
Bioderecho
Biojurídica
Biotecnología
description The so-called Assisted Human Reproduction Techniques (TERAS) constitute a true technological revolution that is being applied to human life and procreation. The so-called “miracles” of modern science have made it possible to solve one of the problems of greatest concern for the human being: infertility. In Peru, there is no specific regulation on these techniques, beyond what is established in Article 7 of the General Health Law; being that the use of TERAS, including the so-called “surrogate belly” are an increasingly frequent reality in our country. The present article raises some reflections on the new challenges that face the right before the new technologies, in the matter of assisted human reproduction; from an amparo process in which the filiation of two minors (twins) procreated through these techniques and with the support of a pregnant-collaborator is discussed. That is to say, a case of “surrogate belly” in the modality of “solidary belly”, whose firm sentence recognizes the motherhood of those who did not bring the ovum, nor carried out the gestation. It is a resolution that declares as a mother, for all its legal and non-legal effects, who had exclusively the will to procreate, proposing a new assumption of affiliation, “affective-social” type, which generates jurisprudence in this matter.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-26
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/1235
10.31381/iusinkarri.vn6.1235
url http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/1235
identifier_str_mv 10.31381/iusinkarri.vn6.1235
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/1235/1127
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Ius Inkarri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Ius Inkarri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ius Inkarri; Vol. 6 Núm. 6 (2017); 175-188
2519-7274
2410-5937
10.31381/iusinkarri.vn6
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
instname:Universidad Ricardo Palma
instacron:URP
instname_str Universidad Ricardo Palma
instacron_str URP
institution URP
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
collection Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1789625142284910592
score 13.871978
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).