Judicial language: Argumentation and style

Descripción del Articulo

Genuine lawyers know that the external form of judicial decisions is not usually subject to control, so that, at first glance, it is irrelevant, legally speaking, the "style" or the literary quality of a judicial decision. Instead, the arguments, the arguments used and the logical internal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Ordoñez Solis, David
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Ricardo Palma
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/4204
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4204
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Language
Law
Judicial Interpretation
Technical language
Semiotics
Ambiguity
Clarity
Lagoons law
Judicial Language
Lenguaje
Derecho
Interpretación jurisdiccional
Técnicas del lenguaje
Semiótica
Ambigüedad
Claridad
Lagunas de la ley
Lenguaje judicial
id REVURP_a6d853a03c089c004e9160e32e2f7f2b
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/4204
network_acronym_str REVURP
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Judicial language: Argumentation and style
Lenguaje judicial: argumentación y estilo
title Judicial language: Argumentation and style
spellingShingle Judicial language: Argumentation and style
Ordoñez Solis, David
Language
Law
Judicial Interpretation
Technical language
Semiotics
Ambiguity
Clarity
Lagoons law
Judicial Language
Lenguaje
Derecho
Interpretación jurisdiccional
Técnicas del lenguaje
Semiótica
Ambigüedad
Claridad
Lagunas de la ley
Lenguaje judicial
title_short Judicial language: Argumentation and style
title_full Judicial language: Argumentation and style
title_fullStr Judicial language: Argumentation and style
title_full_unstemmed Judicial language: Argumentation and style
title_sort Judicial language: Argumentation and style
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ordoñez Solis, David
author Ordoñez Solis, David
author_facet Ordoñez Solis, David
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Language
Law
Judicial Interpretation
Technical language
Semiotics
Ambiguity
Clarity
Lagoons law
Judicial Language
Lenguaje
Derecho
Interpretación jurisdiccional
Técnicas del lenguaje
Semiótica
Ambigüedad
Claridad
Lagunas de la ley
Lenguaje judicial
topic Language
Law
Judicial Interpretation
Technical language
Semiotics
Ambiguity
Clarity
Lagoons law
Judicial Language
Lenguaje
Derecho
Interpretación jurisdiccional
Técnicas del lenguaje
Semiótica
Ambigüedad
Claridad
Lagunas de la ley
Lenguaje judicial
description Genuine lawyers know that the external form of judicial decisions is not usually subject to control, so that, at first glance, it is irrelevant, legally speaking, the "style" or the literary quality of a judicial decision. Instead, the arguments, the arguments used and the logical internal mode of articulating constitute the essence of the motivation and purpose of legal control. However, it must be stressed that style and argument are inextricably linked in language and although most attention of lawyers has been especially argumentation, greater openness and transparency of society demand from the legal point of view the therefore adaptation and updating the judicial style.This is confirmed by the judicial experience in Spain where, as had already proved long ago that "the darkness of the language of the trial is a bad unfortunately widespread in our administration of justice". Only recently they have laid the foundations and measures have been taken in order to improve the judicial language. Educational work and, to some extent copy of the Constitutional Court and the adoption of such fundamental laws have contributed to more expensive this task. In fact it has taken into account the need to make more understandable the judicial language. In the genesis of such agreement, the General Council of the Judiciary considered it essential "to facilitate communication and information in an understandable way to the courts with citizens, using in both oral procedural acts and written, clear and simple language, without prejudice to the necessary technical rigor"Therefore, and in view assimple as a desirable goal, achieving a comprehensive judicial language, this study focused on the study of law and judicial practice, limiting him to two aspects that can be considered fundamental. Therefore examine, first, the main reasons, primarily legal, imposed an improvement of legal language and particularities of language in judicialmotivation. And, secondly, we analyze the Spanish judicial experience regarding efforts to achieve a more consistent judicial language with our current democratic and integrated society in Europe.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4204
10.31381/iusinkarri.vn5.4204
url http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4204
identifier_str_mv 10.31381/iusinkarri.vn5.4204
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4204/5132
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 David Ordoñez Solis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 David Ordoñez Solis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ius Inkarri; Vol. 5 Núm. 5 (2016); 139-166
2519-7274
2410-5937
10.31381/iusinkarri.vn5
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
instname:Universidad Ricardo Palma
instacron:URP
instname_str Universidad Ricardo Palma
instacron_str URP
institution URP
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
collection Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palma
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1789625143460364288
spelling Judicial language: Argumentation and styleLenguaje judicial: argumentación y estiloOrdoñez Solis, DavidLanguageLawJudicial InterpretationTechnical languageSemioticsAmbiguityClarityLagoons lawJudicial LanguageLenguajeDerechoInterpretación jurisdiccionalTécnicas del lenguajeSemióticaAmbigüedadClaridadLagunas de la leyLenguaje judicialGenuine lawyers know that the external form of judicial decisions is not usually subject to control, so that, at first glance, it is irrelevant, legally speaking, the "style" or the literary quality of a judicial decision. Instead, the arguments, the arguments used and the logical internal mode of articulating constitute the essence of the motivation and purpose of legal control. However, it must be stressed that style and argument are inextricably linked in language and although most attention of lawyers has been especially argumentation, greater openness and transparency of society demand from the legal point of view the therefore adaptation and updating the judicial style.This is confirmed by the judicial experience in Spain where, as had already proved long ago that "the darkness of the language of the trial is a bad unfortunately widespread in our administration of justice". Only recently they have laid the foundations and measures have been taken in order to improve the judicial language. Educational work and, to some extent copy of the Constitutional Court and the adoption of such fundamental laws have contributed to more expensive this task. In fact it has taken into account the need to make more understandable the judicial language. In the genesis of such agreement, the General Council of the Judiciary considered it essential "to facilitate communication and information in an understandable way to the courts with citizens, using in both oral procedural acts and written, clear and simple language, without prejudice to the necessary technical rigor"Therefore, and in view assimple as a desirable goal, achieving a comprehensive judicial language, this study focused on the study of law and judicial practice, limiting him to two aspects that can be considered fundamental. Therefore examine, first, the main reasons, primarily legal, imposed an improvement of legal language and particularities of language in judicialmotivation. And, secondly, we analyze the Spanish judicial experience regarding efforts to achieve a more consistent judicial language with our current democratic and integrated society in Europe.Los genuinos juristas saben que la forma externa de las decisiones judiciales no es, por lo general, objeto del control, de manera que, a primera vista, resulta irrelevante, jurídicamente hablando, el "estilo" o la calidad literaria de una decisión judicial. En cambio, los argumentos utilizados, los razonamientos empleados y el modo lógico-interno de articularlos constituyen la esencia de la motivación y el objeto del control jurídico. Sin embargo, es preciso insistir que estilo y argumentación resultan inextricablemente unidos en el lenguaje y si bien la mayor atención de los juristas se ha puesto especialmente en la argumentación, una mayor apertura y transparencia de la sociedad exigen también desde el punto de vista jurídico la consiguiente adaptación y actualización del estilo judicial.Así lo confirma la experiencia judicial en España donde, como ya había comprobado hace tiempo que "la oscuridad del lenguaje del sentenciador es un mal desgraciadamente extendido en nuestra Administración de Justicia". Sólo muy recientemente se han puesto las bases y se han adoptado medidas con el fin de mejorar el lenguaje judicial. La labor pedagógica y, en cierta medida, ejemplar del Tribunal Constitucional, así como la adopción de leyes tan fundamentales han contribuido a encarecer esta tarea. De hecho se ha tenido en cuenta la necesidad de hacer más comprensible el lenguaje judicial. En la génesis de tal acuerdo, el Consejo General de Poder Judicial consideró indispensable: "facilitar la comunicación e información de forma comprensible de los órganos judiciales con el ciudadano, utilizando en las actuaciones procesales, tanto orales como escritas, un lenguaje sencillo y claro, sin perjuicio del necesario rigor técnico"Así pues, y a la vista de un objetivo tan simple como deseable, lograr un lenguaje judicial comprensible, centramos el presente estudio en el estudio del Derecho y en su práctica judicial, limitándolo a dos aspectos que pueden considerarse fundamentales. Por tanto, examinamos, en primer lugar, las principales razones, fundamentalmente jurídicas, que imponen una mejora del lenguaje jurídico y las particularidades del lenguaje en la motivación judicial. Y, en segundo lugar, analizamos la experiencia judicial española en relación con los esfuerzos por alcanzar un lenguaje judicial más acorde con nuestra actual sociedad democrática e integrada en Europa.Universidad Ricardo Palma, Rectorado2021-08-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/420410.31381/iusinkarri.vn5.4204Ius Inkarri; Vol. 5 Núm. 5 (2016); 139-1662519-72742410-593710.31381/iusinkarri.vn5reponame:Revistas - Universidad Ricardo Palmainstname:Universidad Ricardo Palmainstacron:URPspahttp://revistas.urp.edu.pe/index.php/Inkarri/article/view/4204/5132Derechos de autor 2021 David Ordoñez Solishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:oai.revistas.urp.edu.pe:article/42042023-10-14T15:35:39Z
score 13.882472
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).