Design and Validation of a Rubric for the Evaluation of Digital Competencies based on Socioformation

• Autores: Salazar Gómez, Elizabeth, Tobón, Sergio, Juárez Hernández, Luis G.
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2018
• Institución: Universidad Peruana Unión
• Repositorio: Revistas Universidad Peruana Unión
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/329
• Enlace del recurso: https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/329
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: design; competencies; instrumen; validation; digital students; university students; diseño; competencia; instrumento; validación; digitales; estudiantesuniversitarios

Due to the lack of research and tools that explore and evaluate digital competencies, both in educational and community contexts, a rubric of evaluation in digital competencies from a socio-formative approach was designed consisting of: 1) Literature review of existing documents to diagnose or evaluate digital competencies; 2) construction of the instrument through a rubric type structure with the socio-formative taxonomy; 3) review and improvement of the instrument by a panel of 3 experts; 4) the content was validated by a panel of 14 expert judges; 5) the application of the instrument to a pilot group, composed of 45 persons; 6) final improvement of the instrument based on the suggestions and evaluations of the expert judges. Results: from the results of the evaluation by expert judges, an analysis of the descriptive data was carried out, and, according to the Aiken’s V coefficient, items 4,5,6 and 7 obtained a score of (V>0.80), but it was different for items 1,2 and 3, which reflected a lower score (V<0.80). From this and the suggestions issued by the expertjudges, the instrument was modified in relevance and drafting; as for the reliability level according to the value of Cronbach ́s Alfa it situated at .845; suggesting that the instrument is reliable. As for qualitative evaluation, a frequency within acceptable levels was obtained with high relevance and redaction, suggesting improvements in the questions, but there was no suggestions about the elimination of items.