Evaluating teacher performance during the pandemic: opinion from Mexican university students
Descripción del Articulo
Introduction: The evaluation of the performance of university teachers from the opinion of their students is a recurring process, although during the pandemic there are few experiences. Objective: to evaluate the performance of university teachers from the opinion of their students, in the context o...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2023 |
Institución: | Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas |
Lenguaje: | español inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1780 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1780 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | teacher evaluation teaching strategies teaching objectives learning evaluation strategies evaluación docente estrategias de enseñanza objetivos de enseñanza estrategias de evaluación del aprendizaje avaliação de professores estratégias de ensino objetivos de ensino estratégias de avaliação da aprendizagem |
Sumario: | Introduction: The evaluation of the performance of university teachers from the opinion of their students is a recurring process, although during the pandemic there are few experiences. Objective: to evaluate the performance of university teachers from the opinion of their students, in the context of a pandemic. Method: representative sample of 673 students from a Mexican public university, a teacher performance questionnaire adapted for virtual classes was used. Results: most of the teachers adapted to an asynchronous virtual work dynamic, although a significant percentage (41.9%) continued to teach classes synchronously (videoconferences). Teachers in initial formative stages mainly promoted individual content learning, contrasting with those in advanced stages, who promoted situated learning. Students with unfavorable opinions regarding content mastery and assessment strategies mentioned the promotion of rote learning, to the detriment of more constructivist learning. The contrasts were statistically significant. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).