Main methodological issues in the study of job stress in college staff: A systematic review

Descripción del Articulo

Introduction: Research about of job stress at university contexts has not been exempt from conceptual and methodological difficulties. Objective: analyze the main methodological and instrumental aspects in studies published between 2010 and 2019, on job stress in professor, administrative and suppor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rojas-Solís, José Luis, Flores-Meza, Guadalupe, Cuaya-Itzcoatl, Irma Guadalupe
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.upc.edu.pe:article/1248
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:estresse
estresse no trabalho
equipe da faculdade
revisão sistemática
estrés
estrés laboral
personal universitario
revisión sistemática
stress
job stress
college staff
systematic review
id REVUPC_6c971baa06d7d71b53b4968fbab6930b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.upc.edu.pe:article/1248
network_acronym_str REVUPC
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Main methodological issues in the study of job stress in college staff: A systematic review
Principales aspectos metodológicos en el estudio del estrés laboral en personal universitario: Una revisión sistemática
Principais aspectos metodológicos no estudo do stresse ocupacional no pessoal universitário: Uma revisão sistemática
title Main methodological issues in the study of job stress in college staff: A systematic review
spellingShingle Main methodological issues in the study of job stress in college staff: A systematic review
Rojas-Solís, José Luis
estresse
estresse no trabalho
equipe da faculdade
revisão sistemática
estrés
estrés laboral
personal universitario
revisión sistemática
stress
job stress
college staff
systematic review
title_short Main methodological issues in the study of job stress in college staff: A systematic review
title_full Main methodological issues in the study of job stress in college staff: A systematic review
title_fullStr Main methodological issues in the study of job stress in college staff: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Main methodological issues in the study of job stress in college staff: A systematic review
title_sort Main methodological issues in the study of job stress in college staff: A systematic review
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rojas-Solís, José Luis
Flores-Meza, Guadalupe
Cuaya-Itzcoatl, Irma Guadalupe
author Rojas-Solís, José Luis
author_facet Rojas-Solís, José Luis
Flores-Meza, Guadalupe
Cuaya-Itzcoatl, Irma Guadalupe
author_role author
author2 Flores-Meza, Guadalupe
Cuaya-Itzcoatl, Irma Guadalupe
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv estresse
estresse no trabalho
equipe da faculdade
revisão sistemática
estrés
estrés laboral
personal universitario
revisión sistemática
stress
job stress
college staff
systematic review
topic estresse
estresse no trabalho
equipe da faculdade
revisão sistemática
estrés
estrés laboral
personal universitario
revisión sistemática
stress
job stress
college staff
systematic review
description Introduction: Research about of job stress at university contexts has not been exempt from conceptual and methodological difficulties. Objective: analyze the main methodological and instrumental aspects in studies published between 2010 and 2019, on job stress in professor, administrative and support staff working in Latin American universities. Method: following the suggested by the PRISMA model, it was consulted the databases: LA Reference, Dialnet, Scopus, EBSCO and Web of Science, obtaining 258 papers that, after a debugging process, derivated 6 studies for their final review. Results: the results show that all the studies were quantitative, with non-experimental and cross-sectional designs, and with descriptive scopes. In addition, the use of 15 instruments that mainly assess work stress and occupational risk factors was detected. Theoretical and methodological implications derived from the findings are discussed.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248
url https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248/1121
https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248/1369
https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248/1216
https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248/1268
https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248/1332
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/epub+zip
application/xml
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2021): January - June; e1248
Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2021): enero - junio; e1248
Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; v. 15 n. 1 (2021): Janeiro - Junho; e1248
2223-2516
10.19083/ridu
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
instname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
instacron:UPC
instname_str Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
instacron_str UPC
institution UPC
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
collection Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844165169814437888
spelling Main methodological issues in the study of job stress in college staff: A systematic reviewPrincipales aspectos metodológicos en el estudio del estrés laboral en personal universitario: Una revisión sistemáticaPrincipais aspectos metodológicos no estudo do stresse ocupacional no pessoal universitário: Uma revisão sistemáticaRojas-Solís, José LuisFlores-Meza, Guadalupe Cuaya-Itzcoatl, Irma Guadalupeestresseestresse no trabalhoequipe da faculdaderevisão sistemáticaestrésestrés laboralpersonal universitariorevisión sistemáticastressjob stresscollege staffsystematic reviewIntroduction: Research about of job stress at university contexts has not been exempt from conceptual and methodological difficulties. Objective: analyze the main methodological and instrumental aspects in studies published between 2010 and 2019, on job stress in professor, administrative and support staff working in Latin American universities. Method: following the suggested by the PRISMA model, it was consulted the databases: LA Reference, Dialnet, Scopus, EBSCO and Web of Science, obtaining 258 papers that, after a debugging process, derivated 6 studies for their final review. Results: the results show that all the studies were quantitative, with non-experimental and cross-sectional designs, and with descriptive scopes. In addition, the use of 15 instruments that mainly assess work stress and occupational risk factors was detected. Theoretical and methodological implications derived from the findings are discussed.Introducción: El estudio del estrés laboral en el ámbito universitario no ha estado exento de dificultades conceptuales y metodológicas. Objetivo: analizar los principales aspectos metodológicos e instrumentales en estudios publicados entre 2010 y 2019, sobre estrés laboral en docentes, administrativos y personal de apoyo que trabaja en universidades latinoamericanas. Método: siguiendo lo sugerido por el modelo PRISMA, se consultaron las bases de datos: La Referencia, Dialnet, Scopus, EBSCO y Web of Science, obteniendo inicialmente 258 trabajos que dieron lugar a 6 estudios para su revisión final. Resultados: señalan que los estudios fueron cuantitativos, no experimentales y transversales, y con alcances descriptivos. Además, se detectó el uso de 15 instrumentos que principalmente evalúan estrés laboral y factores de riesgo laborales. Discusión: se resaltan niveles significativos de estrés laboral en las muestras incluidas, así como la necesidad de prevenir las causas y factores asociados al fenómeno.As pesquisas sobre estresse no trabalho em contextos universitários não ficaram isentos de dificuldades conceituais e metodológicas, portanto o objetivo desta revisão sistemática é analisar os principais aspectos metodológicos e instrumentais em estudos publicados entre 2010 e 2019, sobre estresse no trabalho em professores, administrativos e pessoal de apoio que trabalha em universidades públicas latino-americanas. Seguindo o sugerido pelo modelo PRISMA, foram consultadas as bases de dados: LA Reference, Dialnet, Scopus, EBSCO e Web of Science, obtendo 258 artigos que, após um processo de depuração, obtiveram 6 estudos para sua revisão final. Os resultados mostram que todos os estudos foram quantitativos, com delineamento não experimental e transversal, e com escopo descritivo. Além disso, foi detectada a utilização de 15 instrumentos que avaliam principalmente o estresse no trabalho e os fatores de risco ocupacionais. As implicações teóricas e metodológicas derivadas dos resultados são discutidas.Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC2020-11-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/epub+zipapplication/xmltext/htmlhttps://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2021): January - June; e1248Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2021): enero - junio; e1248Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria; v. 15 n. 1 (2021): Janeiro - Junho; e12482223-251610.19083/ridureponame:Revistas - Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadasinstname:Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadasinstacron:UPCspaenghttps://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248/1121https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248/1369https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248/1216https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248/1268https://revistas.upc.edu.pe/index.php/docencia/article/view/1248/1332info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistas.upc.edu.pe:article/12482024-03-04T20:33:19Z
score 12.849147
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).