A model for the study of the growth of body area in beef cattle

Descripción del Articulo

Estimation formulas have been established for the establishment of body surface area (BSA), using live weight (LW) and body length for calculation. The objective of this work was to compare four estimation formulas of the BSA – Mitchell [0.09 × LW0.69], Brody [0.14 × LW0.57], Johnson et al. [0.235 ×...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Parés-Casanova, Pere M.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/14434
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14434
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:allometry
logistic model
von Bertalanffy model
Gompertz model
ontogeny
alometría
modelo logístico
modelo von Bertalanffy
modelo Gompertz
ontogenia
id REVUNMSM_f238ee651c84a0d599424ec5b291c379
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/14434
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A model for the study of the growth of body area in beef cattle
Un modelo para el estudio del crecimiento del área corporal en bovinos de carne
title A model for the study of the growth of body area in beef cattle
spellingShingle A model for the study of the growth of body area in beef cattle
Parés-Casanova, Pere M.
allometry
logistic model
von Bertalanffy model
Gompertz model
ontogeny
alometría
modelo logístico
modelo von Bertalanffy
modelo Gompertz
ontogenia
title_short A model for the study of the growth of body area in beef cattle
title_full A model for the study of the growth of body area in beef cattle
title_fullStr A model for the study of the growth of body area in beef cattle
title_full_unstemmed A model for the study of the growth of body area in beef cattle
title_sort A model for the study of the growth of body area in beef cattle
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Parés-Casanova, Pere M.
author Parés-Casanova, Pere M.
author_facet Parés-Casanova, Pere M.
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv allometry
logistic model
von Bertalanffy model
Gompertz model
ontogeny
alometría
modelo logístico
modelo von Bertalanffy
modelo Gompertz
ontogenia
topic allometry
logistic model
von Bertalanffy model
Gompertz model
ontogeny
alometría
modelo logístico
modelo von Bertalanffy
modelo Gompertz
ontogenia
description Estimation formulas have been established for the establishment of body surface area (BSA), using live weight (LW) and body length for calculation. The objective of this work was to compare four estimation formulas of the BSA – Mitchell [0.09 × LW0.69], Brody [0.14 × LW0.57], Johnson et al. [0.235 × LW0.49], Moulton [0.158 × LW5/8] and Hogan and Skouby [LW0.4 × (body length)0.6 × 217] – and three non-linear models – logistic [–y=a/(1 + be-cx)], Gompertz [y=a*exp(b*exp(cx))] and von Bertalanffy [y=a(1-be-cx)] – in terms of their ability to describe the growth of BSA in beef cattle and to detect the best estimator. Fifty-three meat cattle (20 males and 33 females) were used, mostly “Bruna dels Pirineus” and their crosses, with ages between 205 and 407 days, estimated live weight of 543±74 kg, which were slaughtered in a commercial abattoir. After the skinning, a photograph of the extended leather was obtained and using digital methods the BSA was calculated. The BSA was 3.79±1.37 m2 (range 2.55-8.12 m2). Hogan and Skouby formula appeared as the most accurate estimating formula with a determination level of over 58%, the difference in the values being due probably to the surface of the head and the distal parts of the limbs which were not considered in the study, as they were separated in the process of skinning. Among the non-linear models, the best fit was the logistic one, but with a much lower determination level of around 2%. Data shows, moreover, that, in beef cattle, body area has not reached yet its definitive development at 400 days of age. This fact should be considered when setting surface body development and new estimating formulas.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-25
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14434
10.15381/rivep.v29i4.14434
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14434
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rivep.v29i4.14434
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14434/13281
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14434/13804
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Pere M. Parés-Casanova
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Pere M. Parés-Casanova
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 Núm. 4 (2018); 1129-1136
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2018); 1129-1136
1682-3419
1609-9117
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238229398519808
spelling A model for the study of the growth of body area in beef cattleUn modelo para el estudio del crecimiento del área corporal en bovinos de carneParés-Casanova, Pere M.allometrylogistic modelvon Bertalanffy modelGompertz modelontogenyalometríamodelo logísticomodelo von Bertalanffymodelo GompertzontogeniaEstimation formulas have been established for the establishment of body surface area (BSA), using live weight (LW) and body length for calculation. The objective of this work was to compare four estimation formulas of the BSA – Mitchell [0.09 × LW0.69], Brody [0.14 × LW0.57], Johnson et al. [0.235 × LW0.49], Moulton [0.158 × LW5/8] and Hogan and Skouby [LW0.4 × (body length)0.6 × 217] – and three non-linear models – logistic [–y=a/(1 + be-cx)], Gompertz [y=a*exp(b*exp(cx))] and von Bertalanffy [y=a(1-be-cx)] – in terms of their ability to describe the growth of BSA in beef cattle and to detect the best estimator. Fifty-three meat cattle (20 males and 33 females) were used, mostly “Bruna dels Pirineus” and their crosses, with ages between 205 and 407 days, estimated live weight of 543±74 kg, which were slaughtered in a commercial abattoir. After the skinning, a photograph of the extended leather was obtained and using digital methods the BSA was calculated. The BSA was 3.79±1.37 m2 (range 2.55-8.12 m2). Hogan and Skouby formula appeared as the most accurate estimating formula with a determination level of over 58%, the difference in the values being due probably to the surface of the head and the distal parts of the limbs which were not considered in the study, as they were separated in the process of skinning. Among the non-linear models, the best fit was the logistic one, but with a much lower determination level of around 2%. Data shows, moreover, that, in beef cattle, body area has not reached yet its definitive development at 400 days of age. This fact should be considered when setting surface body development and new estimating formulas.Para el establecimiento del área corporal (Body Surface Area, BSA) se han establecido fórmulas de estimación que parten de peso vivo (PV) y longitud corporal para su cálculo. El objetivo de este trabajo fue comparar cuatro fórmulas de estimación de la BSA – Mitchell [0.09 × PV0.69], Brody [0.14 × PV0.57], Johnson et al. [0.235 × PV0.49], Moulton [0.158 × PV5/8] y Hogan y Skouby [PV0.4 × (longitud corporal)0.6 × 217] – y tres modelos no lineales – logístico [y=a/(1+be-cx)], Gompertz [y=a*exp(b*exp(cx))] y von Bertalanffy [y=a(1-be-cx)] – en cuanto a su capacidad para describir el crecimiento de la BSA en bovinos de carne y detectar la mejor estimación. Se trabajó con una muestra de 53 bovinos de aptitud cárnica (20 machos y 33 hembras), mayormente Bruna de los Pirineos y sus cruces, con edades entre 205 y 407 días, peso vivo estimado de 543±74 kg, sacrificados en un matadero frigorífico. Luego del desollado, se obtuvo una fotografía del cuero extendido y por métodos digitales se obtuvo la BSA. La BSA fue de 3.79±1.37 m2 (rango 2.55-8.12 m2). La fórmula de Hogan y Skouby parecería la más ajustada de las cuatro estimaciones consideradas, con un nivel de determinación de más del 58%, siendo la diferencia en los valores debido probablemente a que la superficie de la cabeza y de las partes distales de las extremidades no fueron consideradas en el trabajo, al quedar separadas en el proceso del desollado. Entre los modelos no lineales, el de mejor ajuste fue el logístico, aunque con un nivel de determinación mucho más bajo, entorno de 2%. De los datos se desprende que el área corporal no ha llegado aún a su desarrollo definitivo a los 400 días de edad en este tipo de animales, lo cual debería tenerse en cuenta al establecer curvas de desarrollo corporal y nuevas fórmulas estimativas más ajustadas.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2018-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1443410.15381/rivep.v29i4.14434Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 Núm. 4 (2018); 1129-1136Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2018); 1129-11361682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14434/13281https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14434/13804Derechos de autor 2018 Pere M. Parés-Casanovahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/144342018-11-26T18:06:04Z
score 13.982926
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).