Validity and Reliability of a Good Manufacturing Practices Checklist for the Agro‑Biological Industry

Descripción del Articulo

This research presents the design of a checklist or questionnaire for the application of GMP-SSOP during the production of liquid agro-biologicals. Content validation was determined by the judgment of experts belonging to three subsidiaries of a well-known company in the sector, whereas internal con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Huánuco Azabache, Lucía, Cevallos Ampuero, Juan, Campos Contreras, César
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/20348
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/20348
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:lista de verificación
BPM
agrobiológico
KR20
checklist
GMP
agro-biological
id REVUNMSM_dca528dce51aa0976cd1199120af62b9
oai_identifier_str oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/20348
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
spelling Validity and Reliability of a Good Manufacturing Practices Checklist for the Agro‑Biological IndustryValidez y fiabilidad de una lista de verificación en Buenas Prácticas de Manufactura para la industria de agrobiológicosHuánuco Azabache, LucíaCevallos Ampuero, JuanCampos Contreras, CésarHuánuco Azabache, LucíaCevallos Ampuero, JuanCampos Contreras, Césarlista de verificaciónBPMagrobiológicoKR20checklistGMPagro-biologicalKR20This research presents the design of a checklist or questionnaire for the application of GMP-SSOP during the production of liquid agro-biologicals. Content validation was determined by the judgment of experts belonging to three subsidiaries of a well-known company in the sector, whereas internal consistency was determined with the Kuder‑Richardson KR20 reliability formula. The instrument was established in 210 dichotomous response items distributed in ten dimensions: General, commercial classification, personnel, facilities and equipment, critical support systems, storage area, production area, quality control, documentation, and cleaning and sanitation. It was possible to obtain the applicability consensus of the seven experts and an average KR20 value equal to 0.80. Additionally, all the dimensions presented scores higher than 0.75, which confirmed the validity and reliability of the instrument.Esta investigación presenta el diseño de una lista de verificación o cuestionario para la aplicación de las BPM-POES durante la producción de agrobiológicos líquidos. La validez de contenido se determinó mediante el juicio por expertos que pertenecen a tres filiales de una reconocida empresa del rubro, mientras que la consistencia interna se determinó con el coeficiente de fiabilidad KR20 de Kuder-Richardson. El instrumento quedó definido por 210 ítems de respuesta dicotómica y distribuidos en diez dimensiones: Generalidades, clasificación comercial, personal, instalaciones y equipamiento, sistemas de apoyo crítico, área de almacenamiento, área de producción, control de calidad, documentación y limpieza y sanitización. Se logró obtener el consenso de aplicabilidad de los siete expertos y un valor de KR20 promedio igual a 0.80; además, todas las dimensiones presentaron puntuaciones mayores a 0.75, lo que confirmó la validez y fiabilidad del instrumento.Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos2022-01-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlaudio/mpegaudio/mpeghttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/2034810.15381/idata.v24i2.20348Industrial Data; Vol. 24 Núm. 2 (2021); 175-191Industrial Data; Vol. 24 No. 2 (2021); 175-1911810-99931560-9146reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspaenghttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/20348/17713https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/20348/17714https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/20348/17715https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/20348/17716Derechos de autor 2021 Lucía Huánuco Azabache, Juan Cevallos Ampuero, César Campos Contrerashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es_ESinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/203482022-01-12T11:24:29Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity and Reliability of a Good Manufacturing Practices Checklist for the Agro‑Biological Industry
Validez y fiabilidad de una lista de verificación en Buenas Prácticas de Manufactura para la industria de agrobiológicos
title Validity and Reliability of a Good Manufacturing Practices Checklist for the Agro‑Biological Industry
spellingShingle Validity and Reliability of a Good Manufacturing Practices Checklist for the Agro‑Biological Industry
Huánuco Azabache, Lucía
lista de verificación
BPM
agrobiológico
KR20
checklist
GMP
agro-biological
KR20
title_short Validity and Reliability of a Good Manufacturing Practices Checklist for the Agro‑Biological Industry
title_full Validity and Reliability of a Good Manufacturing Practices Checklist for the Agro‑Biological Industry
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of a Good Manufacturing Practices Checklist for the Agro‑Biological Industry
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of a Good Manufacturing Practices Checklist for the Agro‑Biological Industry
title_sort Validity and Reliability of a Good Manufacturing Practices Checklist for the Agro‑Biological Industry
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Huánuco Azabache, Lucía
Cevallos Ampuero, Juan
Campos Contreras, César
Huánuco Azabache, Lucía
Cevallos Ampuero, Juan
Campos Contreras, César
author Huánuco Azabache, Lucía
author_facet Huánuco Azabache, Lucía
Cevallos Ampuero, Juan
Campos Contreras, César
author_role author
author2 Cevallos Ampuero, Juan
Campos Contreras, César
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv lista de verificación
BPM
agrobiológico
KR20
checklist
GMP
agro-biological
KR20
topic lista de verificación
BPM
agrobiológico
KR20
checklist
GMP
agro-biological
KR20
description This research presents the design of a checklist or questionnaire for the application of GMP-SSOP during the production of liquid agro-biologicals. Content validation was determined by the judgment of experts belonging to three subsidiaries of a well-known company in the sector, whereas internal consistency was determined with the Kuder‑Richardson KR20 reliability formula. The instrument was established in 210 dichotomous response items distributed in ten dimensions: General, commercial classification, personnel, facilities and equipment, critical support systems, storage area, production area, quality control, documentation, and cleaning and sanitation. It was possible to obtain the applicability consensus of the seven experts and an average KR20 value equal to 0.80. Additionally, all the dimensions presented scores higher than 0.75, which confirmed the validity and reliability of the instrument.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/20348
10.15381/idata.v24i2.20348
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/20348
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/idata.v24i2.20348
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/20348/17713
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/20348/17714
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/20348/17715
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/idata/article/view/20348/17716
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Lucía Huánuco Azabache, Juan Cevallos Ampuero, César Campos Contreras
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es_ES
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Lucía Huánuco Azabache, Juan Cevallos Ampuero, César Campos Contreras
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es_ES
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
audio/mpeg
audio/mpeg
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Industrial Data; Vol. 24 Núm. 2 (2021); 175-191
Industrial Data; Vol. 24 No. 2 (2021); 175-191
1810-9993
1560-9146
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1848424573588996096
score 13.901037
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).