Knowledge’s schemes of positive and negative self-talk learning styles in university students

Descripción del Articulo

The research is descriptive and comparative aims to disseminate the results of psychological research on mindsets of self-talk, positive and negative, and learning styles of students in San Marcos belonging to each of the five academic field organizing vocational training: Health Sciences, Basic Sci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Orellana Manrique, Oswaldo, García A., Lupe, Salazar C., Marina, Malaver S., Carmela, Herrera F., Edgar, Yanac R., Elisa, Díaz A., Gloria, Rivera M., Jorge, Zegarra G., Martha, Orellana García, Daphne, Araujo G., Genaro
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2009
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/3753
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/psico/article/view/3753
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:positive self-talk
negative self-talk
learning styles
university academic areas
autodiálogo positivo
autodiálogo negativo
estilos de aprendizaje
áreas académicas universitarias
id REVUNMSM_cf76524751cf318201b273efb686dab6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/3753
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Knowledge’s schemes of positive and negative self-talk learning styles in university students
Esquemas de pensamiento de autodiálogo positivo y negativo y estilos de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios
title Knowledge’s schemes of positive and negative self-talk learning styles in university students
spellingShingle Knowledge’s schemes of positive and negative self-talk learning styles in university students
Orellana Manrique, Oswaldo
positive self-talk
negative self-talk
learning styles
university academic areas
autodiálogo positivo
autodiálogo negativo
estilos de aprendizaje
áreas académicas universitarias
title_short Knowledge’s schemes of positive and negative self-talk learning styles in university students
title_full Knowledge’s schemes of positive and negative self-talk learning styles in university students
title_fullStr Knowledge’s schemes of positive and negative self-talk learning styles in university students
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge’s schemes of positive and negative self-talk learning styles in university students
title_sort Knowledge’s schemes of positive and negative self-talk learning styles in university students
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Orellana Manrique, Oswaldo
García A., Lupe
Salazar C., Marina
Malaver S., Carmela
Herrera F., Edgar
Yanac R., Elisa
Díaz A., Gloria
Rivera M., Jorge
Zegarra G., Martha
Orellana García, Daphne
Araujo G., Genaro
author Orellana Manrique, Oswaldo
author_facet Orellana Manrique, Oswaldo
García A., Lupe
Salazar C., Marina
Malaver S., Carmela
Herrera F., Edgar
Yanac R., Elisa
Díaz A., Gloria
Rivera M., Jorge
Zegarra G., Martha
Orellana García, Daphne
Araujo G., Genaro
author_role author
author2 García A., Lupe
Salazar C., Marina
Malaver S., Carmela
Herrera F., Edgar
Yanac R., Elisa
Díaz A., Gloria
Rivera M., Jorge
Zegarra G., Martha
Orellana García, Daphne
Araujo G., Genaro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv positive self-talk
negative self-talk
learning styles
university academic areas
autodiálogo positivo
autodiálogo negativo
estilos de aprendizaje
áreas académicas universitarias
topic positive self-talk
negative self-talk
learning styles
university academic areas
autodiálogo positivo
autodiálogo negativo
estilos de aprendizaje
áreas académicas universitarias
description The research is descriptive and comparative aims to disseminate the results of psychological research on mindsets of self-talk, positive and negative, and learning styles of students in San Marcos belonging to each of the five academic field organizing vocational training: Health Sciences, Basic Sciences, Engineering, Business and Humanities. For purposes of the study has used two instruments: (1) self-talk Inventory (Calvete, Esteve, Landin), comprising two subscales: positive and negative¸ both with the technical specifications in order to draw conclusions valid and reliable, so we the original statistics, alpha coefficients of 0.89 for negative self-talk scales and 0.86, 0.79 and 0.87 for the subscales of thoughts related to anxiety, depression and anger, respectively. On the other hand, the alpha coefficients were 0.82 for positive self-Scale and 0.72, 0.76 and 0.55 for the subscales of minimization, positive affect and coping self-talk, respectively, (2) Honey-Alonso Questionnaire Learning Styles (CHAEA) investigating four learning styles: active, reflective, theoretical and pragmatic, with consequent acceptance criteria, 0.84 (theoretical), 0.82 (reflective), 0.78 (pragmatic) and 0.74 (active).
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-12-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/psico/article/view/3753
10.15381/rinvp.v12i2.3753
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/psico/article/view/3753
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rinvp.v12i2.3753
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/psico/article/view/3753/3015
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Psicología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Psicología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigación en Psicología; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2009); 25-50
Revista de Investigación en Psicología; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2009); 25-50
1609-7475
1560-909X
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238268773597184
spelling Knowledge’s schemes of positive and negative self-talk learning styles in university studentsEsquemas de pensamiento de autodiálogo positivo y negativo y estilos de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitariosOrellana Manrique, OswaldoGarcía A., LupeSalazar C., MarinaMalaver S., CarmelaHerrera F., EdgarYanac R., ElisaDíaz A., GloriaRivera M., JorgeZegarra G., MarthaOrellana García, DaphneAraujo G., Genaropositive self-talknegative self-talklearning stylesuniversity academic areasautodiálogo positivoautodiálogo negativoestilos de aprendizajeáreas académicas universitariasThe research is descriptive and comparative aims to disseminate the results of psychological research on mindsets of self-talk, positive and negative, and learning styles of students in San Marcos belonging to each of the five academic field organizing vocational training: Health Sciences, Basic Sciences, Engineering, Business and Humanities. For purposes of the study has used two instruments: (1) self-talk Inventory (Calvete, Esteve, Landin), comprising two subscales: positive and negative¸ both with the technical specifications in order to draw conclusions valid and reliable, so we the original statistics, alpha coefficients of 0.89 for negative self-talk scales and 0.86, 0.79 and 0.87 for the subscales of thoughts related to anxiety, depression and anger, respectively. On the other hand, the alpha coefficients were 0.82 for positive self-Scale and 0.72, 0.76 and 0.55 for the subscales of minimization, positive affect and coping self-talk, respectively, (2) Honey-Alonso Questionnaire Learning Styles (CHAEA) investigating four learning styles: active, reflective, theoretical and pragmatic, with consequent acceptance criteria, 0.84 (theoretical), 0.82 (reflective), 0.78 (pragmatic) and 0.74 (active).La investigación es de carácter descriptivo comparativo y tiene como objetivo dar a conocer los resultados de una investigación psicológica sobre los esquemas de pensamiento de autodiálogo, positivo y negativo y estilos de aprendizaje de los estudiantes de San Marcos pertenecientes a cada una de las cinco áreas académicas que organizan la formación profesional: Ciencias de la Salud, Ciencias Básicas, Ingenierías, Ciencias Empresariales y Humanidades. Para los efectos del estudio se ha empleado dos instrumentos: (1) Inventario de Autodiálogo (Calvete, Estevés, Landin), que comprende dos subescalas: positivo y negativo, ambas con las especificaciones técnicas para poder inferir resultados válidos y confiables; así tenemos los estadísticos originales, los coeficientes alpha del 0.89 para las escalas de autodiálogo negativo y 0.86, 0.79 y 0.87 para las subescalas de pensamientos relacionados con la ansiedad, depresión e ira, respectivamente. De otro lado, los coeficientes alpha fueron 0.82 para la Escala de autodiálogo positivo y 0.72, 0.76 y 0.55 para las subescalas de minimización, afecto positivo y autoinstrucciones de afrontamiento respectivamente; (2) Cuestionario Honey-Alonso de Estilos de Aprendizaje (CHAEA) que investiga cuatro estilos de aprendizaje: activo, reflexivo, teórico y pragmático, con los consiguientes criterios de validez, 0.84 (teórico), 0.82 (reflexivo), 0.78 (pragmático) y 0.74 (activo).Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Psicología2009-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/psico/article/view/375310.15381/rinvp.v12i2.3753Revista de Investigación en Psicología; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2009); 25-50Revista de Investigación en Psicología; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2009); 25-501609-74751560-909Xreponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/psico/article/view/3753/3015Derechos de autor 2009 Oswaldo Orellana Manrique, Lupe García A., Marina Salazar C., Carmela Malaver S., Edgar Herrera F., Elisa Yanac R., Gloria Díaz A., Jorge Rivera M., Martha Zegarra G., Daphne Orellana García, Genaro Araujo G.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/37532020-04-22T12:47:48Z
score 13.876703
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).