Cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis (copaiba) oil in patients with peptic ulcer

Descripción del Articulo

Objectives: To determine the cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis’ stem bark copaiba oil compared with omeprazole 20 mg in patients with diagnosis of peptic ulcer. Design: Experimental, comparative, phase II, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Setting: Clinical Investiga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Arroyo-Acevedo, Jorge, Quino-Florentini, Mariano, Martínez-Heredia, Jaime, Almora-Pinedo, Yuan, Alba-González, Alex, Condorhuamán-Figueroa, Martín
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2011
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/991
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/991
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Peptic ulcer
copaiba oil.
Úlcera péptica
aceite de copaiba
id REVUNMSM_aa39e955330701ab9e674378a061b1fa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/991
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis (copaiba) oil in patients with peptic ulcer
Efecto cicatrizante del aceite de Copaifera officinalis (copaiba), en pacientes con úlcera péptica
title Cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis (copaiba) oil in patients with peptic ulcer
spellingShingle Cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis (copaiba) oil in patients with peptic ulcer
Arroyo-Acevedo, Jorge
Peptic ulcer
copaiba oil.
Úlcera péptica
aceite de copaiba
title_short Cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis (copaiba) oil in patients with peptic ulcer
title_full Cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis (copaiba) oil in patients with peptic ulcer
title_fullStr Cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis (copaiba) oil in patients with peptic ulcer
title_full_unstemmed Cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis (copaiba) oil in patients with peptic ulcer
title_sort Cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis (copaiba) oil in patients with peptic ulcer
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Arroyo-Acevedo, Jorge
Quino-Florentini, Mariano
Martínez-Heredia, Jaime
Almora-Pinedo, Yuan
Alba-González, Alex
Condorhuamán-Figueroa, Martín
author Arroyo-Acevedo, Jorge
author_facet Arroyo-Acevedo, Jorge
Quino-Florentini, Mariano
Martínez-Heredia, Jaime
Almora-Pinedo, Yuan
Alba-González, Alex
Condorhuamán-Figueroa, Martín
author_role author
author2 Quino-Florentini, Mariano
Martínez-Heredia, Jaime
Almora-Pinedo, Yuan
Alba-González, Alex
Condorhuamán-Figueroa, Martín
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Peptic ulcer
copaiba oil.
Úlcera péptica
aceite de copaiba
topic Peptic ulcer
copaiba oil.
Úlcera péptica
aceite de copaiba
description Objectives: To determine the cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis’ stem bark copaiba oil compared with omeprazole 20 mg in patients with diagnosis of peptic ulcer. Design: Experimental, comparative, phase II, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Setting: Clinical Investigation Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru. Participants: Patients with diagnosis of peptic ulcer. Interventions: Clinical diagnosis of peptic ulcer was done by endoscopy as well as pre and post treatment evaluation following administration of copaiba oil formulated capsules (80 mg and 120 mg). Sixty patients enrolled voluntarily to the study and signed informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board. Patients were randomly distributed in three groups of 20 cases each according to arrival order; the first and second group received respectively copaiba oil 80 mg and 120 mg capsules, and the third group omeprazole 20 mg, fasting, once daily in the morning, half hour before breakfast. Data was evaluated through multivariate techniques, considering p<0.05 as statistically significant. Main outcome measures: Percentage of patients healing their ulcer. Results: Peptic ulcer cicatrized in 65% and 75% respectively versus 100% in the omeprazole group, without significant adverse effects. Two patients presented nausea and three epigastric pain. Conclusions: Patients with peptic ulcer treated with copaiba oil capsules showed ulcer scarring in 65% to 75% and without significant adverse effects.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-06-13
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/991
10.15381/anales.v72i2.991
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/991
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/anales.v72i2.991
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/991/814
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 72 No. 2 (2011); 113-117
Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 72 Núm. 2 (2011); 113-117
1609-9419
1025-5583
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238240407519232
spelling Cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis (copaiba) oil in patients with peptic ulcerEfecto cicatrizante del aceite de Copaifera officinalis (copaiba), en pacientes con úlcera pépticaArroyo-Acevedo, JorgeQuino-Florentini, MarianoMartínez-Heredia, JaimeAlmora-Pinedo, YuanAlba-González, AlexCondorhuamán-Figueroa, MartínPeptic ulcercopaiba oil.Úlcera pépticaaceite de copaibaObjectives: To determine the cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis’ stem bark copaiba oil compared with omeprazole 20 mg in patients with diagnosis of peptic ulcer. Design: Experimental, comparative, phase II, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Setting: Clinical Investigation Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru. Participants: Patients with diagnosis of peptic ulcer. Interventions: Clinical diagnosis of peptic ulcer was done by endoscopy as well as pre and post treatment evaluation following administration of copaiba oil formulated capsules (80 mg and 120 mg). Sixty patients enrolled voluntarily to the study and signed informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board. Patients were randomly distributed in three groups of 20 cases each according to arrival order; the first and second group received respectively copaiba oil 80 mg and 120 mg capsules, and the third group omeprazole 20 mg, fasting, once daily in the morning, half hour before breakfast. Data was evaluated through multivariate techniques, considering p<0.05 as statistically significant. Main outcome measures: Percentage of patients healing their ulcer. Results: Peptic ulcer cicatrized in 65% and 75% respectively versus 100% in the omeprazole group, without significant adverse effects. Two patients presented nausea and three epigastric pain. Conclusions: Patients with peptic ulcer treated with copaiba oil capsules showed ulcer scarring in 65% to 75% and without significant adverse effects.Objetivos: Determinar la eficacia cicatrizante del aceite de copaiba obtenido de la corteza de Copaifera officinalis, comparado con omeprazol 20 mg, en pacientes con diagnóstico definitivo de úlcera péptica. Diseño: Estudio experimental, clínico comparativo, de fase II, aleatorio, doble ciego, grupo paralelo. Institución: Instituto de Investigaciones Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú. Participantes: Pacientes con diagnóstico definitivo de úlcera péptica. Intervenciones: El diagnóstico fue tanto por exploración física como complementaria, siendo la endoscopia la técnica de elección, con evaluación pre y postratamiento con aceite de copaiba, formulada en cápsulas de 80 mg y 120 mg. El ensayo clínico incluyó 60 pacientes que voluntariamente ingresaron al programa de estudio, previa firma del consentimiento informado aprobado por el Comité institucional de Ética en Investigación. Los pacientes fueron distribuidos aleatoriamente en tres grupos, de 20 casos cada uno, según orden de llegada; los dos primeros grupos recibieron cápsulas de aceite de copaiba, en dosis de 80 y 120 mg, respectivamente; y un tercer grupo recibió omeprazol 20 mg. Los tratamientos fueron administrados en ayunas, una vez por la mañana, 30 minutos antes de la ingesta del primer alimento. Los datos fueron evaluados mediante técnicas multivariadas, considerando estadísticamente significativo p<0,05. Se tuvo en cuenta el consentimiento informado aprobado por el Comité de Bioética en Investigación del Centro Asistencial. Principales medidas de resultados: Porcentaje de cicatrización. Resultados: Se logró 65% y 75% de cicatrización de la úlcera péptica con aceite de copaiba, respectivamente, contra 100% en el grupo de omeprazol, sin efectos adversos significativos; dos presentaron náuseas y tres epigastralgia. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con úlcera péptica y con tratamiento de las cápsulas conteniendo aceite de copaiba mostraron cicatrización de la úlcera de 65 a 75% y sin efectos adversos significativos.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Humana2011-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/99110.15381/anales.v72i2.991Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 72 No. 2 (2011); 113-117Anales de la Facultad de Medicina; Vol. 72 Núm. 2 (2011); 113-1171609-94191025-5583reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/anales/article/view/991/814Derechos de autor 2011 Jorge Arroyo-Acevedo, Mariano Quino-Florentini, Jaime Martínez-Heredia, Yuan Almora-Pinedo, Alex Alba-González6, Martín Condorhuamán-Figueroahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/9912020-04-15T19:19:21Z
score 13.882472
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).