Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm

Descripción del Articulo

The aim of the study was to compare the coproparasitological method of Benedek sedimentation against the immunoenzimeassay for the diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle from a Cuban livestock large farm. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in February-March 2008 and faecal samples w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Godoy M., Yuraimis, Roque L., Eungenio, Rodríguez F., Rafmarys
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2010
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/134
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/134
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Fasciola hepatica
coprológico
inmunoenzimático
bovino
conic cup
immunoenzymatic
bovine
id REVUNMSM_a106f179d895b1bd8decd6c912ec809a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/134
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
spelling Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farmDIAGNÓSTICO COPROPARASITOLÓGICO DE FASCIOLA HEPATICA EN GANADO BOVINO EN UNA EMPRESA PECUARIA CUBANA.Godoy M., YuraimisRoque L., EungenioRodríguez F., RafmarysFasciola hepaticacoprológicoinmunoenzimáticobovinoFasciola hepaticaconic cupimmunoenzymaticbovineThe aim of the study was to compare the coproparasitological method of Benedek sedimentation against the immunoenzimeassay for the diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle from a Cuban livestock large farm. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in February-March 2008 and faecal samples were collected to 254 Jersey, Holstein, and crossbreed animals. Sixteen positive cases (6.3%) were detected using FasciDIG whereas only 10 (3.9%) using the Benedek sedimentation method. It was concluded that the immunoassay method (FasciDIG) showed better diagnostic sensitivity than the Benedek sedimentation test.Con el objetivo de comparar el método coproparasitológico de sedimentación de Benedek con el kit inmunoenzimático FasciDIG para el diagnóstico de Fasciola hepatica en ganado bovino de una empresa pecuaria cubana, se realizó un estudio descriptivotransversal entre febrero y marzo de 2008. Se colectó muestras de heces a 254 bovinos Jersey, Holstein y mestizos. Se encontró 16 (6.3%) animales positivos mediante el FasciDIG y 10 (3.9%) por la técnica de sedimentación de Benedek. Se concluye que el método inmunoenzimático (FasciDIG) demostró mayor detectabilidad diagnóstica que el método de sedimentación.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2010-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13410.15381/rivep.v21i2.134Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2010); 175-179Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2010); 175-1791682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/134/126Derechos de autor 2010 Yuraimis Godoy M., Eungenio Roque L., Rafmarys Rodríguez F.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/1342020-03-17T18:34:47Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm
DIAGNÓSTICO COPROPARASITOLÓGICO DE FASCIOLA HEPATICA EN GANADO BOVINO EN UNA EMPRESA PECUARIA CUBANA.
title Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm
spellingShingle Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm
Godoy M., Yuraimis
Fasciola hepatica
coprológico
inmunoenzimático
bovino
Fasciola hepatica
conic cup
immunoenzymatic
bovine
title_short Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm
title_full Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm
title_fullStr Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm
title_full_unstemmed Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm
title_sort Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Godoy M., Yuraimis
Roque L., Eungenio
Rodríguez F., Rafmarys
author Godoy M., Yuraimis
author_facet Godoy M., Yuraimis
Roque L., Eungenio
Rodríguez F., Rafmarys
author_role author
author2 Roque L., Eungenio
Rodríguez F., Rafmarys
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Fasciola hepatica
coprológico
inmunoenzimático
bovino
Fasciola hepatica
conic cup
immunoenzymatic
bovine
topic Fasciola hepatica
coprológico
inmunoenzimático
bovino
Fasciola hepatica
conic cup
immunoenzymatic
bovine
description The aim of the study was to compare the coproparasitological method of Benedek sedimentation against the immunoenzimeassay for the diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle from a Cuban livestock large farm. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in February-March 2008 and faecal samples were collected to 254 Jersey, Holstein, and crossbreed animals. Sixteen positive cases (6.3%) were detected using FasciDIG whereas only 10 (3.9%) using the Benedek sedimentation method. It was concluded that the immunoassay method (FasciDIG) showed better diagnostic sensitivity than the Benedek sedimentation test.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/134
10.15381/rivep.v21i2.134
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/134
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rivep.v21i2.134
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/134/126
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2010 Yuraimis Godoy M., Eungenio Roque L., Rafmarys Rodríguez F.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2010 Yuraimis Godoy M., Eungenio Roque L., Rafmarys Rodríguez F.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2010); 175-179
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2010); 175-179
1682-3419
1609-9117
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238220570558464
score 13.7211075
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).