Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm
Descripción del Articulo
The aim of the study was to compare the coproparasitological method of Benedek sedimentation against the immunoenzimeassay for the diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle from a Cuban livestock large farm. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in February-March 2008 and faecal samples w...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2010 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/134 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/134 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Fasciola hepatica coprológico inmunoenzimático bovino conic cup immunoenzymatic bovine |
id |
REVUNMSM_a106f179d895b1bd8decd6c912ec809a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/134 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farmDIAGNÓSTICO COPROPARASITOLÓGICO DE FASCIOLA HEPATICA EN GANADO BOVINO EN UNA EMPRESA PECUARIA CUBANA.Godoy M., YuraimisRoque L., EungenioRodríguez F., RafmarysFasciola hepaticacoprológicoinmunoenzimáticobovinoFasciola hepaticaconic cupimmunoenzymaticbovineThe aim of the study was to compare the coproparasitological method of Benedek sedimentation against the immunoenzimeassay for the diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle from a Cuban livestock large farm. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in February-March 2008 and faecal samples were collected to 254 Jersey, Holstein, and crossbreed animals. Sixteen positive cases (6.3%) were detected using FasciDIG whereas only 10 (3.9%) using the Benedek sedimentation method. It was concluded that the immunoassay method (FasciDIG) showed better diagnostic sensitivity than the Benedek sedimentation test.Con el objetivo de comparar el método coproparasitológico de sedimentación de Benedek con el kit inmunoenzimático FasciDIG para el diagnóstico de Fasciola hepatica en ganado bovino de una empresa pecuaria cubana, se realizó un estudio descriptivotransversal entre febrero y marzo de 2008. Se colectó muestras de heces a 254 bovinos Jersey, Holstein y mestizos. Se encontró 16 (6.3%) animales positivos mediante el FasciDIG y 10 (3.9%) por la técnica de sedimentación de Benedek. Se concluye que el método inmunoenzimático (FasciDIG) demostró mayor detectabilidad diagnóstica que el método de sedimentación.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2010-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/13410.15381/rivep.v21i2.134Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2010); 175-179Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2010); 175-1791682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/134/126Derechos de autor 2010 Yuraimis Godoy M., Eungenio Roque L., Rafmarys Rodríguez F.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/1342020-03-17T18:34:47Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm DIAGNÓSTICO COPROPARASITOLÓGICO DE FASCIOLA HEPATICA EN GANADO BOVINO EN UNA EMPRESA PECUARIA CUBANA. |
title |
Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm |
spellingShingle |
Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm Godoy M., Yuraimis Fasciola hepatica coprológico inmunoenzimático bovino Fasciola hepatica conic cup immunoenzymatic bovine |
title_short |
Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm |
title_full |
Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm |
title_fullStr |
Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm |
title_full_unstemmed |
Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm |
title_sort |
Coproparasitological diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle in a cuban livestock farm |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Godoy M., Yuraimis Roque L., Eungenio Rodríguez F., Rafmarys |
author |
Godoy M., Yuraimis |
author_facet |
Godoy M., Yuraimis Roque L., Eungenio Rodríguez F., Rafmarys |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Roque L., Eungenio Rodríguez F., Rafmarys |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Fasciola hepatica coprológico inmunoenzimático bovino Fasciola hepatica conic cup immunoenzymatic bovine |
topic |
Fasciola hepatica coprológico inmunoenzimático bovino Fasciola hepatica conic cup immunoenzymatic bovine |
description |
The aim of the study was to compare the coproparasitological method of Benedek sedimentation against the immunoenzimeassay for the diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in cattle from a Cuban livestock large farm. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in February-March 2008 and faecal samples were collected to 254 Jersey, Holstein, and crossbreed animals. Sixteen positive cases (6.3%) were detected using FasciDIG whereas only 10 (3.9%) using the Benedek sedimentation method. It was concluded that the immunoassay method (FasciDIG) showed better diagnostic sensitivity than the Benedek sedimentation test. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-31 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/134 10.15381/rivep.v21i2.134 |
url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/134 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/rivep.v21i2.134 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/134/126 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2010 Yuraimis Godoy M., Eungenio Roque L., Rafmarys Rodríguez F. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2010 Yuraimis Godoy M., Eungenio Roque L., Rafmarys Rodríguez F. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2010); 175-179 Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2010); 175-179 1682-3419 1609-9117 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
instacron_str |
UNMSM |
institution |
UNMSM |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1795238220570558464 |
score |
13.7211075 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).