Efficacy of high-intensity interval-training compared to moderate-intensity continuous training on canine aerobic potency: a randomised clinical trial

Descripción del Articulo

The study aimed to assess the efficacy of high-intensity interval-training (HIIT) compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for 12 weeks on a treadmill on maximal aerobic potency, aerobic resistance, respiratory and heart rate at rest, left ventricle structure and function in dogs. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Orozco Padilla, Sonia Cecilia, Correa Lozano, Natalia, Restrepo Rojas, Oliver, Carvajal Giraldo, Pablo Andres, Arias Gonzalez, Maria Patricia, Gallo Villegas, Jaime Alberto, Olivera Angel, Martha
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/27364
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/27364
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:aerobic potency
exercise
canine
interval training
treadmill
potencia aeróbica
ejercicio
canino
entrenamiento por intervalos
cinta de correr
Descripción
Sumario:The study aimed to assess the efficacy of high-intensity interval-training (HIIT) compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for 12 weeks on a treadmill on maximal aerobic potency, aerobic resistance, respiratory and heart rate at rest, left ventricle structure and function in dogs. The study design was a blinded controlled clinical trial. Thirty untrained dogs between 12 and 84 months were randomly distributed in the groups: HIIT (n=11), MICT (n=9); and control (n=10). Dogs with cardiovascular, neuromuscular, orthopaedic conditions, body condition score over 7, or any abnormalities that impaired exercise performance were excluded. Before and after the programme, dogs performed an incremental exercise test to determine the maximal velocity (Vmax) and velocity at lactate threshold (VLT). Respiratory and heart rates and left ventricular chambers and systolic function at rest were measured previously and after. Clinical difference in Vmax was observed between the HIIT (14.4 km/h) and MICT (12.8 km/h) (p = 0.038), with a medium effect size (r = 0.46). HIIT had comparable risk of adverse events as MICT. It was concluded that HIIT was more efficacious at increasing maximal aerobic potency than MICT.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).