Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic
Descripción del Articulo
The present study compared productive parameters in broilers supplemented with a probiotic Biomin® Poultry 5 Star (Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus salivarius y Lactobacillus reuteri) versus an antibiotic (Bacitracin). A total of 333 chicks were...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2010 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/140 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/140 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | probiótico antibiótico pollos de carne probiotic antibiotic broiler chickens |
| id |
REVUNMSM_864740abdb6ef2ddc5262e6bef8e2602 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/140 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibioticComparación del rendimiento productivo de pollos de carne suplementados con un probiótico versus un antibióticoOsorio P., CarlosIcochea D., ElianaReyna S., PabloGuzmán G., JohnCazorla M., FernandoCarcelén C., Fernandoprobióticoantibióticopollos de carneprobioticantibioticbroiler chickensThe present study compared productive parameters in broilers supplemented with a probiotic Biomin® Poultry 5 Star (Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus salivarius y Lactobacillus reuteri) versus an antibiotic (Bacitracin). A total of 333 chicks were divided into three treatments of 111 animals with 3 repetitions for group: 1 control; 2 antibiotic; 3 probiotic. During the six weeks of the study no statistical differences were found between treatments for body weight, feed consumption, feed conversion, mortality rate, and productive efficiency index.El estudio comparó parámetros productivos de pollos de carne suplementados con un probiótico Biomin® Poultry 5 Star (Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus salivarius y Lactobacillus reuteri) versus un antibiótico (Zinc Bacitracina). Se usaron 333 aves divididas en tres tratamientos de 111 animales con 3 repeticiones por tratamiento: 1, control; 2, antibiótico; y 3, probiótico. En las seis semanas de crianza no se encontró diferencia significativa entre tratamientos para peso corporal, consumo de alimento, conversión alimenticia (ICA), porcentaje de mortalidad y el índice de eficiencia productiva (IEP).Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2010-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14010.15381/rivep.v21i2.140Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2010); 219-222Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2010); 219-2221682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/140/132Derechos de autor 2010 Carlos Osorio P., Eliana Icochea D., Pablo Reyna S., John Guzmán G., Fernando Cazorla M., Fernando Carcelén C.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/1402020-03-17T18:50:51Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic Comparación del rendimiento productivo de pollos de carne suplementados con un probiótico versus un antibiótico |
| title |
Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic |
| spellingShingle |
Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic Osorio P., Carlos probiótico antibiótico pollos de carne probiotic antibiotic broiler chickens |
| title_short |
Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic |
| title_full |
Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic |
| title_sort |
Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Osorio P., Carlos Icochea D., Eliana Reyna S., Pablo Guzmán G., John Cazorla M., Fernando Carcelén C., Fernando |
| author |
Osorio P., Carlos |
| author_facet |
Osorio P., Carlos Icochea D., Eliana Reyna S., Pablo Guzmán G., John Cazorla M., Fernando Carcelén C., Fernando |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Icochea D., Eliana Reyna S., Pablo Guzmán G., John Cazorla M., Fernando Carcelén C., Fernando |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
probiótico antibiótico pollos de carne probiotic antibiotic broiler chickens |
| topic |
probiótico antibiótico pollos de carne probiotic antibiotic broiler chickens |
| description |
The present study compared productive parameters in broilers supplemented with a probiotic Biomin® Poultry 5 Star (Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus salivarius y Lactobacillus reuteri) versus an antibiotic (Bacitracin). A total of 333 chicks were divided into three treatments of 111 animals with 3 repetitions for group: 1 control; 2 antibiotic; 3 probiotic. During the six weeks of the study no statistical differences were found between treatments for body weight, feed consumption, feed conversion, mortality rate, and productive efficiency index. |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-31 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/140 10.15381/rivep.v21i2.140 |
| url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/140 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/rivep.v21i2.140 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/140/132 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2010); 219-222 Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2010); 219-222 1682-3419 1609-9117 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| instacron_str |
UNMSM |
| institution |
UNMSM |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1795238220590481408 |
| score |
13.836569 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
