Efecto de la administración adecuada de calostro sobre niveles inmunitarios, ganancia de peso e incidencia de diarreas en crías de vaquillas de primer parto
Descripción del Articulo
The effect of controlled colostrum administration (timing of first intake, volume, and immunological quality) on first-calf cow calves was evaluated. Forty-four first-calf Friesian calves were used. Of these, 21 calves were assigned to the control group: colostrum intake by natural suckling from the...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/29068 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/29068 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | calf heifer colostrum diarrhoea immunoglobulins ternero vaquilla calostro diarrea inmunoglobulinas |
| Sumario: | The effect of controlled colostrum administration (timing of first intake, volume, and immunological quality) on first-calf cow calves was evaluated. Forty-four first-calf Friesian calves were used. Of these, 21 calves were assigned to the control group: colostrum intake by natural suckling from the mother during the first 24 hours of life, and 23 calves were assigned to the treatment group: 6 L bottle-fed colostrum of excellent immunological quality (>50 mg/ml Ig) during the first 12 hours of life. The calves were then artificially reared for 60 days under a traditional system. Total serum protein (TSP) levels were assessed on days 1, 4, and 8 of life, along with daily weight gain (DWG), the occurrence and severity of diarrhoea, and mortality rate. The treatment group achieved a higher TSP concentration (p<0.05) than the control group (6.28, 6.17, and 5.81 vs. 4.6; 4.6 and 4.6 g/dL, respectively) at the three evaluation times. The DWG for the period was higher (p<0.05) in the treatment group (0.370 g/d) compared to the control group (0.317 g/d). Furthermore, there was a higher incidence (p<0.05) of diarrhoea in the control group than in the treatment group and higher mortality (17.4 vs. 0%, respectively). |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).