Evaluation of three implant-supported hybrid prostheses All-on-4® designs. A finite element analysis 3D

Descripción del Articulo

Objective. To evaluate stress distribution of three prosthetic designs with the Revitalize Zimmer-Biomet system which follows the All-on-4® concept. Methods. Three 3D models were simulated: R1- Computer-designed and manufactured bar splinting implants, R2- CrCo bar without implant splinting and R3-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Carmona Ramírez, Nora Elena, Villaraga Ossa, Junes Abdul, Latorre Correa, Federico
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/17721
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/17721
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Dental implants
Hybrid prostheses
Finite elements analysis
(source: MeSH NLM)
Implantes dentales
Prótesis híbrida
Análisis de elementos finitos
(fuente: DeCS BIREME)
Descripción
Sumario:Objective. To evaluate stress distribution of three prosthetic designs with the Revitalize Zimmer-Biomet system which follows the All-on-4® concept. Methods. Three 3D models were simulated: R1- Computer-designed and manufactured bar splinting implants, R2- CrCo bar without implant splinting and R3- without internal structure. Each model had four implants (2 anterior straight and 2 posterior distally angled 15º). An axial and oblique load (45º) of 400 N was applied and distributed throughout the prosthesis. Results. The concentration of stress in the peri-implant bone was located in the crestal area for all models with similar values, being slightly higher for R2 (28.74 MPa) and R3 (27.99 MPa). On the prosthesis, the stress increased slightly for the R2 (16.84 MPa) model. In relation to the bar, the highest stress concentration was for R1 (22.16 MPa) and R2 (14.69 MPa) models. Conclusions. There were slight differences between the three designs, none of them exceeded the yield limit of the materials, the non-splinted model showed more stress on the bone.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).