Evaluation of the protection of a vectorized vaccine against Gumboro disease under controlled conditions in commercial laying pullets
Descripción del Articulo
The protection conferred by a vaccination programme against Gumboro disease was evaluated in commercial laying pullets vaccinated with a trivalent vectorized vaccine applied at the first day of age via eye-drop. One hundred pullets distributed in two groups of 50 chicks were used. Group A vaccinated...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2018 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/14756 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14756 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | virus de la enfermedad infecciosa de la Bursa IBDV vacuna vectorizada trivalente efectos de protección mortalidad infection bursitis disease virus trivalent vectorized vaccine protection effects morta |
id |
REVUNMSM_5e68dc2931e91a03bd8b36af6f4301da |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/14756 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the protection of a vectorized vaccine against Gumboro disease under controlled conditions in commercial laying pullets Evaluación de la protección de una vacuna vectorizada contra la enfermedad de Gumboro bajo condiciones controladas en pollitas de postura comercial |
title |
Evaluation of the protection of a vectorized vaccine against Gumboro disease under controlled conditions in commercial laying pullets |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the protection of a vectorized vaccine against Gumboro disease under controlled conditions in commercial laying pullets Lavado A., Nicol virus de la enfermedad infecciosa de la Bursa IBDV vacuna vectorizada trivalente efectos de protección mortalidad infection bursitis disease virus IBDV trivalent vectorized vaccine protection effects morta |
title_short |
Evaluation of the protection of a vectorized vaccine against Gumboro disease under controlled conditions in commercial laying pullets |
title_full |
Evaluation of the protection of a vectorized vaccine against Gumboro disease under controlled conditions in commercial laying pullets |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the protection of a vectorized vaccine against Gumboro disease under controlled conditions in commercial laying pullets |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the protection of a vectorized vaccine against Gumboro disease under controlled conditions in commercial laying pullets |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the protection of a vectorized vaccine against Gumboro disease under controlled conditions in commercial laying pullets |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Lavado A., Nicol Icochea D’A., Eliana Perales, Rosa |
author |
Lavado A., Nicol |
author_facet |
Lavado A., Nicol Icochea D’A., Eliana Perales, Rosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Icochea D’A., Eliana Perales, Rosa |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
virus de la enfermedad infecciosa de la Bursa IBDV vacuna vectorizada trivalente efectos de protección mortalidad infection bursitis disease virus IBDV trivalent vectorized vaccine protection effects morta |
topic |
virus de la enfermedad infecciosa de la Bursa IBDV vacuna vectorizada trivalente efectos de protección mortalidad infection bursitis disease virus IBDV trivalent vectorized vaccine protection effects morta |
description |
The protection conferred by a vaccination programme against Gumboro disease was evaluated in commercial laying pullets vaccinated with a trivalent vectorized vaccine applied at the first day of age via eye-drop. One hundred pullets distributed in two groups of 50 chicks were used. Group A vaccinated with the trivalent vaccine and group B not vaccinated. At 35 days of age the birds were challenged with the classic strain F 52/70 of the Gumboro virus via ocular route. Mortality, clinical signs, macro and microscopic bursal lesions and Bursal index before and after the challenge were evaluated as protection indicators. In addition, the immune response was evaluated on day 1, 35 and 49 of age using the ELISA test and productive parameters of both groups were also compared. Birds of the unvaccinated group had 33.3% of clinical Gumboro mortality and clinical signs (diarrhea and depression) and macro and microscopic lesions more severe than those of the vaccinated group, and vaccinated birds did not show mortality and were fully recovered of clinical signs 10 days after the challenge. The values of the Bursal index of birds of group B indicated bursal atrophy at 6 and 14 days post challenge, but not those of group A. On day 35 (the day of the challenge), the birds of group A showed low seroconversion of maternal antibodies while group B no antibodies were detected (p<0.05). The vaccinated group obtained greater body weight, and better feed conversion and uniformity in relation to the unvaccinated group (p<0.05). It is concluded that the vaccination of laying pullets with trivalent vectorized vaccine at the first day of age induces efficient protection against the clinical form of Gumboro disease. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14756 10.15381/rivep.v29i3.14756 |
url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14756 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/rivep.v29i3.14756 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14756/13090 https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14756/13901 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 Nicol Lavado A., Eliana Icochea D’A., Rosa Perales https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 Nicol Lavado A., Eliana Icochea D’A., Rosa Perales https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 Núm. 3 (2018); 931-941 Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2018); 931-941 1682-3419 1609-9117 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
instacron_str |
UNMSM |
institution |
UNMSM |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1795238229534834688 |
spelling |
Evaluation of the protection of a vectorized vaccine against Gumboro disease under controlled conditions in commercial laying pulletsEvaluación de la protección de una vacuna vectorizada contra la enfermedad de Gumboro bajo condiciones controladas en pollitas de postura comercialLavado A., NicolIcochea D’A., ElianaPerales, Rosavirus de la enfermedad infecciosa de la BursaIBDVvacuna vectorizada trivalenteefectos de protecciónmortalidadinfection bursitis disease virusIBDVtrivalent vectorized vaccineprotection effectsmortaThe protection conferred by a vaccination programme against Gumboro disease was evaluated in commercial laying pullets vaccinated with a trivalent vectorized vaccine applied at the first day of age via eye-drop. One hundred pullets distributed in two groups of 50 chicks were used. Group A vaccinated with the trivalent vaccine and group B not vaccinated. At 35 days of age the birds were challenged with the classic strain F 52/70 of the Gumboro virus via ocular route. Mortality, clinical signs, macro and microscopic bursal lesions and Bursal index before and after the challenge were evaluated as protection indicators. In addition, the immune response was evaluated on day 1, 35 and 49 of age using the ELISA test and productive parameters of both groups were also compared. Birds of the unvaccinated group had 33.3% of clinical Gumboro mortality and clinical signs (diarrhea and depression) and macro and microscopic lesions more severe than those of the vaccinated group, and vaccinated birds did not show mortality and were fully recovered of clinical signs 10 days after the challenge. The values of the Bursal index of birds of group B indicated bursal atrophy at 6 and 14 days post challenge, but not those of group A. On day 35 (the day of the challenge), the birds of group A showed low seroconversion of maternal antibodies while group B no antibodies were detected (p<0.05). The vaccinated group obtained greater body weight, and better feed conversion and uniformity in relation to the unvaccinated group (p<0.05). It is concluded that the vaccination of laying pullets with trivalent vectorized vaccine at the first day of age induces efficient protection against the clinical form of Gumboro disease.Se evaluó la protección conferida por un programa de vacunación contra la enfermedad de Gumboro en pollitas de postura comercial que se les aplicó una vacuna vectorizada trivalente al primer día de edad por vía ocular. Se utilizaron 100 pollitas distribuidas en dos grupos de 50 aves. El grupo A vacunado con la vacuna trivalente y el grupo B no vacunado. A los 35 días de edad se realizó el desafío experimental con la cepa clásica F 52/70 del virus de Gumboro por vía ocular. Como indicadores de protección se evaluó la mortalidad, signos clínicos, lesiones macro y microscópicas bursales e índice bursal antes y después del desafío. Además, se evaluó la respuesta inmune en el día 1, 35 y 49 de edad mediante la prueba de ELISA y se compararon los parámetros productivos de ambos grupos. Las aves del grupo no vacunado presentaron 33.3% de mortalidad por Gumboro clínico, así como signos clínicos (diarrea y depresión) y lesiones macro y microscópicas más severos que los del grupo vacunado, en donde a los 10 días del desafío se observó una recuperación completa de signos clínicos sin mortalidad. Los valores del Índice Bursal de las aves del grupo B indicaron atrofia bursal a los 6 y 14 días pos-desafío, no así las del grupo A. Al día 35, previo al desafío, las aves del grupo A mostraron seroconversión de bajo nivel de anticuerpos maternales mientras que en las del grupo B no se detectaron anticuerpos (p<0.05). El grupo vacunado obtuvo mayor peso corporal, y mejor conversión alimenticia y uniformidad en relación con el grupo no vacunado (p<0.05). Se concluye que la vacunación de pollitas de postura con la vacuna vectorizada trivalente al primer día de edad induce eficiente protección contra la forma clínica de la enfermedad de Gumboro.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2018-09-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1475610.15381/rivep.v29i3.14756Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 Núm. 3 (2018); 931-941Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2018); 931-9411682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14756/13090https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14756/13901Derechos de autor 2018 Nicol Lavado A., Eliana Icochea D’A., Rosa Peraleshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/147562018-12-21T09:58:01Z |
score |
13.882472 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).