Evaluation of ram sperm quality post-thawing by using two energy sources and two cryoprotectants

Descripción del Articulo

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two monosaccharides (fructose and glucose) and two cryoprotectants (glycerol and ethylene glycol) on semen quality after the cryopreservation process under a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement. The variables evaluated were progressive motility, viability,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ruiz G., Luis, Sandoval M., Rocío, Santiani A., Alexei
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/10942
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/10942
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:frozen semen
extenders
fructose
glucose
glycerol
ethylene glycol
semen congelado
diluyentes de semen
fructosa
glucosa
glicerol
etilenglicol
id REVUNMSM_53204ba78d85858b819b16a8d3af70a5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/10942
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of ram sperm quality post-thawing by using two energy sources and two cryoprotectantsEvaluación de la Calidad Espermática del Semen Ovino Posdescongelación al Emplear Dos Fuentes Energéticas y Dos CrioprotectoresRuiz G., LuisSandoval M., RocíoSantiani A., Alexeifrozen semenextendersfructoseglucoseglycerolethylene glycolsemen congeladodiluyentes de semenfructosaglucosagliceroletilenglicolThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two monosaccharides (fructose and glucose) and two cryoprotectants (glycerol and ethylene glycol) on semen quality after the cryopreservation process under a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement. The variables evaluated were progressive motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity. Motility was greater with the use of glycerol (65.5%) compared to the use of ethylene glycol (49.0%) (p<0.05); also, motility using fructose was higher with the use of fructose (59.3%) than when using glucose (55.1%) (p<0.05). Acrosomal integrity was superior with the use of glycerol (58.2%) compared with ethylene glycol (42.0%); also, acrosomal integrity was superior with the use of fructose (53.8%) than when using glucose (46.4%) (p<0.05). The energy source x cryoprotectant interaction was not statistically significant. The results showed that the use of glycerol as a cryoprotectant and fructose as an energy source more effectively prevent loss of semen quality during cryopreservation in comparison to ethylene glycol and glucose, respectively.El objetivo del presente trabajo fue estudiar el efecto de dos fuentes energéticas (frucotsa y glucosa) y dos crioprotectores (glicerol y etilenglicol) sobre la calidad seminal luego del proceso de criopreservación en un arreglo factorial de 2 x 2. Se evaluó la motilidad progresiva, la viabilidad y la integridad acrosomal. La motilidad fue superior con el uso de glicerol (65.5%) en comparación con el uso de etilenglicol (49.0%) (p<0.05); asimismo, la motilidad fue superior con el uso de fructosa (59.3%) que con glucosa (55.1%) (p<0.05). La integridad acrosomal fue superior con el uso de glicerol (58.2%) en comparación con el etilenglicol (42.0%); asimismo, la integridad acrosomal fue superior con el uso de fructosa (53.8%) que con glucosa (46.4%) (p<0.05). La interacción fuente energética x crioprotector no fue significativa. Los resultados demuestran que la utilización de glicerol como agente crioprotector y de fructosa como fuente energética previenen en forma más efectiva la pérdida de calidad seminal durante el proceso de criopreservación en comparación que el etilenglicol y la glucosa, respectivamente.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2015-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1094210.15381/rivep.v26i1.10942Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2015); 49-56Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2015); 49-561682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/10942/9964Derechos de autor 2015 Luis Ruiz G., Rocío Sandoval M., Alexei Santiani A.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/109422020-03-29T18:38:57Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of ram sperm quality post-thawing by using two energy sources and two cryoprotectants
Evaluación de la Calidad Espermática del Semen Ovino Posdescongelación al Emplear Dos Fuentes Energéticas y Dos Crioprotectores
title Evaluation of ram sperm quality post-thawing by using two energy sources and two cryoprotectants
spellingShingle Evaluation of ram sperm quality post-thawing by using two energy sources and two cryoprotectants
Ruiz G., Luis
frozen semen
extenders
fructose
glucose
glycerol
ethylene glycol
semen congelado
diluyentes de semen
fructosa
glucosa
glicerol
etilenglicol
title_short Evaluation of ram sperm quality post-thawing by using two energy sources and two cryoprotectants
title_full Evaluation of ram sperm quality post-thawing by using two energy sources and two cryoprotectants
title_fullStr Evaluation of ram sperm quality post-thawing by using two energy sources and two cryoprotectants
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of ram sperm quality post-thawing by using two energy sources and two cryoprotectants
title_sort Evaluation of ram sperm quality post-thawing by using two energy sources and two cryoprotectants
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ruiz G., Luis
Sandoval M., Rocío
Santiani A., Alexei
author Ruiz G., Luis
author_facet Ruiz G., Luis
Sandoval M., Rocío
Santiani A., Alexei
author_role author
author2 Sandoval M., Rocío
Santiani A., Alexei
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv frozen semen
extenders
fructose
glucose
glycerol
ethylene glycol
semen congelado
diluyentes de semen
fructosa
glucosa
glicerol
etilenglicol
topic frozen semen
extenders
fructose
glucose
glycerol
ethylene glycol
semen congelado
diluyentes de semen
fructosa
glucosa
glicerol
etilenglicol
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two monosaccharides (fructose and glucose) and two cryoprotectants (glycerol and ethylene glycol) on semen quality after the cryopreservation process under a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement. The variables evaluated were progressive motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity. Motility was greater with the use of glycerol (65.5%) compared to the use of ethylene glycol (49.0%) (p<0.05); also, motility using fructose was higher with the use of fructose (59.3%) than when using glucose (55.1%) (p<0.05). Acrosomal integrity was superior with the use of glycerol (58.2%) compared with ethylene glycol (42.0%); also, acrosomal integrity was superior with the use of fructose (53.8%) than when using glucose (46.4%) (p<0.05). The energy source x cryoprotectant interaction was not statistically significant. The results showed that the use of glycerol as a cryoprotectant and fructose as an energy source more effectively prevent loss of semen quality during cryopreservation in comparison to ethylene glycol and glucose, respectively.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/10942
10.15381/rivep.v26i1.10942
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/10942
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/rivep.v26i1.10942
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/10942/9964
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2015 Luis Ruiz G., Rocío Sandoval M., Alexei Santiani A.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2015 Luis Ruiz G., Rocío Sandoval M., Alexei Santiani A.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2015); 49-56
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2015); 49-56
1682-3419
1609-9117
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238225820778496
score 13.873255
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).