Comparison of the Friedewald formula with the precipitate method for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle
Descripción del Articulo
The aim of this study was to compare two methods (precipitate and Friedewald) for the determination of LDL cholesterol values in cattle. Blood samples were taken from 56 cattle in early morning. In the serum LDL cholesterol levels were determined by the precipitation method and the Friedewald formul...
Autores: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2018 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/14087 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14087 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | LDL cholesterol cattle precipitation method Friedewald formula colesterol LDL bovinos método precipitado fórmula de Friedewald |
id |
REVUNMSM_42c3d517843bd3a56d07c3a5c3c614a5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/14087 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of the Friedewald formula with the precipitate method for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattleComparación de la Formula de Friedewald con el método precipitado para la determinación de los niveles de colesterol LDL en bovinosOsorio, José HenryCastañeda, Jorge AbelLDL cholesterolcattleprecipitation methodFriedewald formulacolesterol LDLbovinosmétodo precipitadofórmula de FriedewaldThe aim of this study was to compare two methods (precipitate and Friedewald) for the determination of LDL cholesterol values in cattle. Blood samples were taken from 56 cattle in early morning. In the serum LDL cholesterol levels were determined by the precipitation method and the Friedewald formula. The results were analyzed using a oneway analysis of variance. The precipitated method reported values (mg/dl) of 14.33, 0.36, 59.11, 58.75 and 11.21 for average, minimum, maximum, range and standard deviation, respectively, and by the Friedewald method values (mg/dl) were 62.04, 13.68, 156.82, 143.14 and 32.97 respectively, with significant difference between the two methods for a confidence level of 95.0%. The results indicate that the use of the precipitation method for the determination of LDL cholesterol in cattle is not recommended.El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar dos métodos (precipitado y Friedewald) para la determinación de los valores de colesterol LDL en bovinos. Se tomaron 56 muestras de sangre de bovinos en las primeras horas de la mañana. Se determinaron los niveles de colesterol LDL en el suero mediante el método de precipitación y mediante la fórmula de Friedewald. Los resultados fueron analizados mediante un análisis de varianza de una vía. El método precipitado reportó valores (mg/dl) de 14.33, 0.36, 59.11, 58.75 y 11.21 para promedio, mínimo, máximo, rango y desviación estándar, respectivamente, y mediante el método de Friedewald se obtuvieron valores (mg/dl) de 62.04, 13.68, 156.82, 143.14 y 32.97, respectivamente, habiendo diferencia significativa entre estos métodos para un nivel de confianza del 95.0%. Los resultados indican que no es recomendable la utilización del método de precipitación para la determinación del colesterol LDL en los bovinos.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria2018-03-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1408710.15381/rivep.v29i1.14087Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 Núm. 1 (2018); 120-125Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2018); 120-1251682-34191609-9117reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14087/12745https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14087/13985Derechos de autor 2018 José Henry Osorio, Jorge Abel Castañedahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/140872018-03-15T04:44:35Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the Friedewald formula with the precipitate method for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle Comparación de la Formula de Friedewald con el método precipitado para la determinación de los niveles de colesterol LDL en bovinos |
title |
Comparison of the Friedewald formula with the precipitate method for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of the Friedewald formula with the precipitate method for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle Osorio, José Henry LDL cholesterol cattle precipitation method Friedewald formula colesterol LDL bovinos método precipitado fórmula de Friedewald |
title_short |
Comparison of the Friedewald formula with the precipitate method for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle |
title_full |
Comparison of the Friedewald formula with the precipitate method for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the Friedewald formula with the precipitate method for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the Friedewald formula with the precipitate method for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle |
title_sort |
Comparison of the Friedewald formula with the precipitate method for the determination of LDL cholesterol levels in cattle |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Osorio, José Henry Castañeda, Jorge Abel |
author |
Osorio, José Henry |
author_facet |
Osorio, José Henry Castañeda, Jorge Abel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Castañeda, Jorge Abel |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
LDL cholesterol cattle precipitation method Friedewald formula colesterol LDL bovinos método precipitado fórmula de Friedewald |
topic |
LDL cholesterol cattle precipitation method Friedewald formula colesterol LDL bovinos método precipitado fórmula de Friedewald |
description |
The aim of this study was to compare two methods (precipitate and Friedewald) for the determination of LDL cholesterol values in cattle. Blood samples were taken from 56 cattle in early morning. In the serum LDL cholesterol levels were determined by the precipitation method and the Friedewald formula. The results were analyzed using a oneway analysis of variance. The precipitated method reported values (mg/dl) of 14.33, 0.36, 59.11, 58.75 and 11.21 for average, minimum, maximum, range and standard deviation, respectively, and by the Friedewald method values (mg/dl) were 62.04, 13.68, 156.82, 143.14 and 32.97 respectively, with significant difference between the two methods for a confidence level of 95.0%. The results indicate that the use of the precipitation method for the determination of LDL cholesterol in cattle is not recommended. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-14 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14087 10.15381/rivep.v29i1.14087 |
url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14087 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/rivep.v29i1.14087 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14087/12745 https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/14087/13985 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 José Henry Osorio, Jorge Abel Castañeda https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 José Henry Osorio, Jorge Abel Castañeda https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 Núm. 1 (2018); 120-125 Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2018); 120-125 1682-3419 1609-9117 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
instacron_str |
UNMSM |
institution |
UNMSM |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1795238228672905216 |
score |
13.774068 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).