Evaluation of formulated blending of fertilizers with increasing doses and addition of organic matter in dark tobacco in a sandy soil under greenhouse conditions
Descripción del Articulo
This trial compares 3 formulated blending of fertilizers (a traditional blending, a mineral fertilizer 10-15-20 and an organic-mineral fertilizer 8-12-16) in increasing doses, with and without the addition of organic matter (worm compost) in tobacco cultivation. This trial was conducted in a sandy s...
Autores: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2002 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/2532 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/2532 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | mezclas formuladas de fertilizantes suelo arenoso tabaco negro Formulated blending of fertilizers sandy soil dark tobacco |
id |
REVUNMSM_3c51bc526d2105dc61d931c8a45fe056 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/2532 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of formulated blending of fertilizers with increasing doses and addition of organic matter in dark tobacco in a sandy soil under greenhouse conditions Evaluación de mezclas formuladas de fertilizantes con dosis crecientes y aplicación de materia orgánica en el rendimiento de tabaco negro en un suelo arenoso bajo condiciones de invernadero |
title |
Evaluation of formulated blending of fertilizers with increasing doses and addition of organic matter in dark tobacco in a sandy soil under greenhouse conditions |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of formulated blending of fertilizers with increasing doses and addition of organic matter in dark tobacco in a sandy soil under greenhouse conditions Cóndor G, Aníbal mezclas formuladas de fertilizantes suelo arenoso tabaco negro Formulated blending of fertilizers sandy soil dark tobacco |
title_short |
Evaluation of formulated blending of fertilizers with increasing doses and addition of organic matter in dark tobacco in a sandy soil under greenhouse conditions |
title_full |
Evaluation of formulated blending of fertilizers with increasing doses and addition of organic matter in dark tobacco in a sandy soil under greenhouse conditions |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of formulated blending of fertilizers with increasing doses and addition of organic matter in dark tobacco in a sandy soil under greenhouse conditions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of formulated blending of fertilizers with increasing doses and addition of organic matter in dark tobacco in a sandy soil under greenhouse conditions |
title_sort |
Evaluation of formulated blending of fertilizers with increasing doses and addition of organic matter in dark tobacco in a sandy soil under greenhouse conditions |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cóndor G, Aníbal Villagarcía H., Sven |
author |
Cóndor G, Aníbal |
author_facet |
Cóndor G, Aníbal Villagarcía H., Sven |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Villagarcía H., Sven |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
mezclas formuladas de fertilizantes suelo arenoso tabaco negro Formulated blending of fertilizers sandy soil dark tobacco |
topic |
mezclas formuladas de fertilizantes suelo arenoso tabaco negro Formulated blending of fertilizers sandy soil dark tobacco |
description |
This trial compares 3 formulated blending of fertilizers (a traditional blending, a mineral fertilizer 10-15-20 and an organic-mineral fertilizer 8-12-16) in increasing doses, with and without the addition of organic matter (worm compost) in tobacco cultivation. This trial was conducted in a sandy soil of irrigation using 2 dark tobacco seedlings per pot. Soil fertilization for each NPK doses in mg.kg-1 was: low dose (160-60-80), medium dose (320-120-160) and high dose (480-180-240). A complete randomized design with factorial arrangement and three replications was used. Replications were 4 kg soil pots. The evaluation consisted in measuring the yield of the fresh weight of the aerial part and the dry weight of the aerial and rooted part of the plants. It could be seen that none of the formulated blending used were much better among them in terms of the fresh and dry matter evaluated, with an average of 432,5 g and 112,6 g, respectively. In this way, there are three alternatives when fertilizing tobacco. However, when we use the organic-mineral fertilizer we can get more benefits for soils because there is a 25% of organic matter in its composition for each 100 kg of the fertilizer. While doses are increased yields also increase, the direct effect of fertilizers was evident in the sandy soil without a high visible salinity. Besides, it could be seen the poor fertility of the soil when comparing the additional treatment 0-0-0 with the other ones producing more than 300% in terms of yield. There is no significant effect in the interaction fertilizer-organic matter in the production of aerial fresh matter and total dry matter due to the low application of organic matter (1%). |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-12-30 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/2532 10.15381/rpb.v9i2.2532 |
url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/2532 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/rpb.v9i2.2532 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/2532/2225 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2002 Aníbal Cóndor G, Sven Villagarcía H. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2002 Aníbal Cóndor G, Sven Villagarcía H. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2002); 121-126 Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2002); 121-126 1727-9933 1561-0837 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
instacron_str |
UNMSM |
institution |
UNMSM |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1795238309812764672 |
spelling |
Evaluation of formulated blending of fertilizers with increasing doses and addition of organic matter in dark tobacco in a sandy soil under greenhouse conditionsEvaluación de mezclas formuladas de fertilizantes con dosis crecientes y aplicación de materia orgánica en el rendimiento de tabaco negro en un suelo arenoso bajo condiciones de invernaderoCóndor G, AníbalVillagarcía H., Svenmezclas formuladas de fertilizantessuelo arenosotabaco negroFormulated blending of fertilizerssandy soildark tobaccoThis trial compares 3 formulated blending of fertilizers (a traditional blending, a mineral fertilizer 10-15-20 and an organic-mineral fertilizer 8-12-16) in increasing doses, with and without the addition of organic matter (worm compost) in tobacco cultivation. This trial was conducted in a sandy soil of irrigation using 2 dark tobacco seedlings per pot. Soil fertilization for each NPK doses in mg.kg-1 was: low dose (160-60-80), medium dose (320-120-160) and high dose (480-180-240). A complete randomized design with factorial arrangement and three replications was used. Replications were 4 kg soil pots. The evaluation consisted in measuring the yield of the fresh weight of the aerial part and the dry weight of the aerial and rooted part of the plants. It could be seen that none of the formulated blending used were much better among them in terms of the fresh and dry matter evaluated, with an average of 432,5 g and 112,6 g, respectively. In this way, there are three alternatives when fertilizing tobacco. However, when we use the organic-mineral fertilizer we can get more benefits for soils because there is a 25% of organic matter in its composition for each 100 kg of the fertilizer. While doses are increased yields also increase, the direct effect of fertilizers was evident in the sandy soil without a high visible salinity. Besides, it could be seen the poor fertility of the soil when comparing the additional treatment 0-0-0 with the other ones producing more than 300% in terms of yield. There is no significant effect in the interaction fertilizer-organic matter in the production of aerial fresh matter and total dry matter due to the low application of organic matter (1%).El presente trabajo compara tres mezclas formuladas de fertilizantes —una mezcla tradicional; un fertilizante mineral 10-15-20; y un fertilizante orgánico-mineral 8-12-16 en dosis crecientes, con y sin aplicación de materia orgánica (humus de lombriz)— en el cultivo de tabaco. El experimento se condujo en un suelo arenoso de irrigación utilizando 2 plántulas de tabaco negro por maceta. La fertilización al suelo para cada dosis de NPK en mg.kg-1/maceta fue: dosis baja (160-60-80), dosis media (320-120-160) y dosis alta (480-180-240). Se utilizó el diseño completo al azar con arreglo factorial, con tres repeticiones y conducido en macetas con 4 kg de suelo. La evaluación consistió en medir el rendimiento en peso fresco de la parte aérea y el peso seco total (parte aérea y radicular) de las plantas. Fue posible observar que no existe superioridad en cuanto a la materia fresca y seca total producidas entre las mezclas formuladas utilizadas, con un promedio de 432,5g/maceta y 112,6g/ maceta, respectivamente. Se pudo tener así tres alternativas en la fertilización de tabaco. Sin embargo, con el uso del fertilizante orgánico-mineral se obtendría mayores beneficios en el suelo por el efecto residual que dejaría por contener en su composición un 25% de materia orgánica por cada 100 kg de fertilizante. Conforme aumentan las dosis de fertilización se incrementan también los rendimientos, notándose el efecto directo de los fertilizantes en el sustrato arenoso utilizado, sin salinidad que pueda haber afectado la asimilación de nutrientes. Además, se observó la baja fertilidad del sustrato al comparar el tratamiento adicional 0-0-0 con los demás tratamientos, lo que ha producido mas del 300% en cuanto a rendimiento. No existe efecto significativo en la interacción fertilizante vs. materia orgánica en la producción de materia fresca aérea y seca total, debido a que la dosis de materia orgánica fue baja (1%).Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas2002-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/253210.15381/rpb.v9i2.2532Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2002); 121-126Revista Peruana de Biología; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2002); 121-1261727-99331561-0837reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/rpb/article/view/2532/2225Derechos de autor 2002 Aníbal Cóndor G, Sven Villagarcía H.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/25322020-05-25T18:17:49Z |
score |
13.927358 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).