Geomechanical characterization for tunnels in carbonate rock masses withdissolution processes – UASD Tunnel Case (Dominican Republic)

Descripción del Articulo

The study addresses the challenge of geomechanical characterization of carbonate rocks affected by dissolution and karstification, which are notadequately assessed using conventional classification methods. These methods focus on structures such as joints and fractures, overlooking specificfeatures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Matencio Quispe, Herman, Guadalupe Gómez, Enrique, Meza Aréstegui, Pablo Rubén
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/30963
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/iigeo/article/view/30963
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Carbonate platform
carbonate rocks
dissolution processes
geomechanical characterization
geomechanical classification
Hoek-Brown criteria
tunnel excavation
Caracterización geomecánica
clasificación geomecánica
criterios Hoek-Brown
excavación de túneles
plataforma carbonatada
procesos de disolución
rocas carbonatadas
Descripción
Sumario:The study addresses the challenge of geomechanical characterization of carbonate rocks affected by dissolution and karstification, which are notadequately assessed using conventional classification methods. These methods focus on structures such as joints and fractures, overlooking specificfeatures of carbonate rocks, such as cavities. Thus, the main objective of the research is to evaluate the geomechanical characteristics of rockmasses affected by dissolution in order to establish a suitable geomechanical classification. The methodology used was descriptive, based on structured observation through detailed geological mapping, geomechanical assessments, laboratory tests, and borehole logging.Various lithotypes and their geomechanical behavior were evaluated, considering factors such as strength, weathering, rock mass structure, and cavity characteristics (shape, size, infill, moisture, and alteration). Initially, conventional classification systems were applied: RMR (Bieniawski, 1989) and GSI (Marinos & Hoek, 2000). Results showed that Coral Limestone I exhibits good geomechanical behavior, Coral Limestones II and II-A show intermediate behavior, Rock Caliche types 1 and 2 are not suitable for support, and cavities and alterations negatively impact tunnel stability.Theproposed methodology was validated during the excavation and construction of the UASD Tunnel in the Dominican Republic, yielding satisfactoryresults.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).