Some methodological and epistemological inconsistencies that can be incurred when the «leap» from data to abstract and analytical discourse, in Social Anthropology. Some critical notes

Descripción del Articulo

How the “leap” of the data, to the abstract discourse of interpretation and analysis, occurs in Social Anthropology, is a perennialepistemological and methodological question in the social sciences. The multivocality and historicity of the response, always plural,shows that the social sciences are a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Hernández Lefranc, Harold
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/23864
Enlace del recurso:https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociales/article/view/23864
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:methodology
epistemology
social anthropology
history
metodología
epistemología
antropología social
historia
id REVUNMSM_18fa4711db9e576f04c25711b6bfc00f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/23864
network_acronym_str REVUNMSM
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository_id_str
spelling Some methodological and epistemological inconsistencies that can be incurred when the «leap» from data to abstract and analytical discourse, in Social Anthropology. Some critical notesAlgunas inconsistencias metodológicas y epistemológicas en que puede incurrirse cuando el “salto” de los datos al discurso abstracto y analítico, en la Antropología Social. Algunas anotaciones críticasHernández Lefranc, HaroldHernández Lefranc, Haroldmethodologyepistemologysocial anthropologyhistorymetodologíaepistemologíaantropología socialhistoriaHow the “leap” of the data, to the abstract discourse of interpretation and analysis, occurs in Social Anthropology, is a perennialepistemological and methodological question in the social sciences. The multivocality and historicity of the response, always plural,shows that the social sciences are also subject to the accidents of becoming, intersubjectivity, criticism, and historical processes,which affect the legitimacy of discourse. Notwithstanding this, and since extreme relativism is unacceptable, it can be acceptedthat there are certain methodological and epistemological problems that can be recognized, and that deserve to be overcome, inorder to avoid incurring in epistemological inconsistencies. Thus, what this text develops, as a pertinent exercise, is to point outand elucidate some of those let’s call them epistemological-methodological problems, which continuously occur as obstacles inthe researches of Social Anthropology, but which extend to all the particular disciplines of the Social Sciences.Cómo acontece el “salto” de los datos, al discurso abstracto de la interpretación y el análisis, en Antropología Social, es una pregunta epistemológica y metodológica perenne en las ciencias sociales. La multivocidad e historicidad de la respuesta, siempre plural, evidencia que las ciencias sociales también están sometidas a los accidentes del devenir, de la intersubjetividad, de la crítica, y de los procesos históricos, que afectan la legitimidad del discurso. No obstante esto, y siendo que el relativismo extremo es inaceptable, puede aceptarse que hay ciertos problemas metodológicos y epistemológicos que pueden reconocerse, y que ameritan ser sorteados, para así evitar incurrir en inconsistencias epistemológicas. Así, lo que el presente texto desarrolla, como ejercicio pertinente, es señalar y elucidar algunos de esos llamémosles problemas epistemológico-metodológicos, que acontecen continuamente como escollos en las investigaciones de la Antropología Social, pero que se extienden a todas las disciplinas particulares de las ciencias sociales.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales2022-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociales/article/view/2386410.15381/is.n47.23864Investigaciones Sociales; No. 47 (2022); 17-26Investigaciones Sociales; Núm. 47 (2022); 17-261818-47581560-9073reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociales/article/view/23864/18781Derechos de autor 2022 Harold Hernández Lefranchttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.csi.unmsm:article/238642022-10-29T20:39:11Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Some methodological and epistemological inconsistencies that can be incurred when the «leap» from data to abstract and analytical discourse, in Social Anthropology. Some critical notes
Algunas inconsistencias metodológicas y epistemológicas en que puede incurrirse cuando el “salto” de los datos al discurso abstracto y analítico, en la Antropología Social. Algunas anotaciones críticas
title Some methodological and epistemological inconsistencies that can be incurred when the «leap» from data to abstract and analytical discourse, in Social Anthropology. Some critical notes
spellingShingle Some methodological and epistemological inconsistencies that can be incurred when the «leap» from data to abstract and analytical discourse, in Social Anthropology. Some critical notes
Hernández Lefranc, Harold
methodology
epistemology
social anthropology
history
metodología
epistemología
antropología social
historia
title_short Some methodological and epistemological inconsistencies that can be incurred when the «leap» from data to abstract and analytical discourse, in Social Anthropology. Some critical notes
title_full Some methodological and epistemological inconsistencies that can be incurred when the «leap» from data to abstract and analytical discourse, in Social Anthropology. Some critical notes
title_fullStr Some methodological and epistemological inconsistencies that can be incurred when the «leap» from data to abstract and analytical discourse, in Social Anthropology. Some critical notes
title_full_unstemmed Some methodological and epistemological inconsistencies that can be incurred when the «leap» from data to abstract and analytical discourse, in Social Anthropology. Some critical notes
title_sort Some methodological and epistemological inconsistencies that can be incurred when the «leap» from data to abstract and analytical discourse, in Social Anthropology. Some critical notes
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Hernández Lefranc, Harold
Hernández Lefranc, Harold
author Hernández Lefranc, Harold
author_facet Hernández Lefranc, Harold
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv methodology
epistemology
social anthropology
history
metodología
epistemología
antropología social
historia
topic methodology
epistemology
social anthropology
history
metodología
epistemología
antropología social
historia
description How the “leap” of the data, to the abstract discourse of interpretation and analysis, occurs in Social Anthropology, is a perennialepistemological and methodological question in the social sciences. The multivocality and historicity of the response, always plural,shows that the social sciences are also subject to the accidents of becoming, intersubjectivity, criticism, and historical processes,which affect the legitimacy of discourse. Notwithstanding this, and since extreme relativism is unacceptable, it can be acceptedthat there are certain methodological and epistemological problems that can be recognized, and that deserve to be overcome, inorder to avoid incurring in epistemological inconsistencies. Thus, what this text develops, as a pertinent exercise, is to point outand elucidate some of those let’s call them epistemological-methodological problems, which continuously occur as obstacles inthe researches of Social Anthropology, but which extend to all the particular disciplines of the Social Sciences.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociales/article/view/23864
10.15381/is.n47.23864
url https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociales/article/view/23864
identifier_str_mv 10.15381/is.n47.23864
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/sociales/article/view/23864/18781
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Harold Hernández Lefranc
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Harold Hernández Lefranc
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Investigaciones Sociales; No. 47 (2022); 17-26
Investigaciones Sociales; Núm. 47 (2022); 17-26
1818-4758
1560-9073
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron:UNMSM
instname_str Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
instacron_str UNMSM
institution UNMSM
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
collection Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1795238219727503360
score 13.871978
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).