From the noun phrase to the determinative phrase
Descripción del Articulo
In the development of modern linguistics, it is evident the extraordinary relevance that the lexical category determiner has experienced to the detriment of the other constituents of the FN in the consideration of its hierarchical status, since it has gone from being a non-nuclear element (optional...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2002 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/26435 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/26435 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | frase nominal frase determinativa gramática categorial proyección sintáctica núcleo noun phrase determinative phrase categorical grammar syntactic projection nucleus sintagma nominal sintagma determinativo gramática categórica projeção sintática |
| id |
REVUNMSM_18dcc67b64d70f95a9aad7964c3bb677 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/26435 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUNMSM |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
From the noun phrase to the determinative phrase De la frase nominal a la frase determinativa Do sintagma nominal ao sintagma determinante |
| title |
From the noun phrase to the determinative phrase |
| spellingShingle |
From the noun phrase to the determinative phrase Esquivel Villafana, Jorge frase nominal frase determinativa gramática categorial proyección sintáctica núcleo noun phrase determinative phrase categorical grammar syntactic projection nucleus sintagma nominal sintagma determinativo gramática categórica projeção sintática núcleo |
| title_short |
From the noun phrase to the determinative phrase |
| title_full |
From the noun phrase to the determinative phrase |
| title_fullStr |
From the noun phrase to the determinative phrase |
| title_full_unstemmed |
From the noun phrase to the determinative phrase |
| title_sort |
From the noun phrase to the determinative phrase |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Esquivel Villafana, Jorge Esquivel Villafana, Jorge Esquivel Villafana, Jorge |
| author |
Esquivel Villafana, Jorge |
| author_facet |
Esquivel Villafana, Jorge |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
frase nominal frase determinativa gramática categorial proyección sintáctica núcleo noun phrase determinative phrase categorical grammar syntactic projection nucleus sintagma nominal sintagma determinativo gramática categórica projeção sintática núcleo |
| topic |
frase nominal frase determinativa gramática categorial proyección sintáctica núcleo noun phrase determinative phrase categorical grammar syntactic projection nucleus sintagma nominal sintagma determinativo gramática categórica projeção sintática núcleo |
| description |
In the development of modern linguistics, it is evident the extraordinary relevance that the lexical category determiner has experienced to the detriment of the other constituents of the FN in the consideration of its hierarchical status, since it has gone from being a non-nuclear element (optional or obligatory) in the nominal structuring in generative grammar (according to Chomsky, Postal, Fillmore, etc.) to a nuclear position, generator of its own maximum projection, the determinative phrase, in categorial grammar (according to Abney). Over the years, from 1957 to the present, its position has been consolidated, as reported by the various versions of FN that were configured with the support of the linguistic evidence of the moment. Hence our interest in examining its impressive evolution within the framework of the two modern currents: the generative and the categorial. The analysis of the versions of Chomsky, Postal, and Fillmore, and also that of Abney, as the most prominent representatives of both grammars, will allow us to know not only the theoretical motivations that supported the versions in question, but also the evolution and enrichment of the theoretical arguments in favor of Abney's proposal, which is assumed to be the most appropriate at present. |
| publishDate |
2002 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-01-20 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/26435 10.15381/lengsoc.v1i4.26435 |
| url |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/26435 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.15381/lengsoc.v1i4.26435 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/26435/20147 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2002 Jorge Esquivel Villafana https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2002 Jorge Esquivel Villafana https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Lengua y Sociedad; Núm. 4 (2002); 26-37 Lengua y Sociedad; n. 4 (2002); 26-37 Lengua y Sociedad; No. 4 (2002); 26-37 2413-2659 1729-9721 10.15381/lengsoc.v1i4 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos instacron:UNMSM |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| instacron_str |
UNMSM |
| institution |
UNMSM |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| collection |
Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1848424668999974912 |
| spelling |
From the noun phrase to the determinative phraseDe la frase nominal a la frase determinativaDo sintagma nominal ao sintagma determinanteEsquivel Villafana, JorgeEsquivel Villafana, JorgeEsquivel Villafana, Jorgefrase nominalfrase determinativagramática categorialproyección sintácticanúcleonoun phrasedeterminative phrasecategorical grammarsyntactic projectionnucleussintagma nominalsintagma determinativogramática categóricaprojeção sintáticanúcleoIn the development of modern linguistics, it is evident the extraordinary relevance that the lexical category determiner has experienced to the detriment of the other constituents of the FN in the consideration of its hierarchical status, since it has gone from being a non-nuclear element (optional or obligatory) in the nominal structuring in generative grammar (according to Chomsky, Postal, Fillmore, etc.) to a nuclear position, generator of its own maximum projection, the determinative phrase, in categorial grammar (according to Abney). Over the years, from 1957 to the present, its position has been consolidated, as reported by the various versions of FN that were configured with the support of the linguistic evidence of the moment. Hence our interest in examining its impressive evolution within the framework of the two modern currents: the generative and the categorial. The analysis of the versions of Chomsky, Postal, and Fillmore, and also that of Abney, as the most prominent representatives of both grammars, will allow us to know not only the theoretical motivations that supported the versions in question, but also the evolution and enrichment of the theoretical arguments in favor of Abney's proposal, which is assumed to be the most appropriate at present.En el desarrollo de la lingüística moderna. resulta evidente la extraordinaria relevancia que ha experimentado la categoría lexical determinante en desmedro de los otros constituyentes de la FN en la consideración de su status jerárquico, pues ha pasado de ser un elemento no nuclear (opcional u obligatorio) en la estructuración nominal en la gramática generativa (según Chomsky, Postal, Fillmore, etc.) a una posición nuclear, generadora de su propia proyección máxima, la frase determinativa, en la gramática categorial (Según Abney). A través de los años, desde 1957 a la actualidad, su posición ha ido consolidándose, según lo refieren las diversas versiones de FN que fueron configurándose con el soporte de la evidencias lingüística del momento. De aquí nuestro interés de examinar su impresionante evolución en el marco de las dos corrientes modernas: la generativa y la categorial. El análisis de las versiones de Chomsky, Postal, y Fillmore, y también la de Abney, como los más destacados representantes de ambas gramáticas, nos permitirá conocer no sólo las motivaciones teóricas que sustentaron las versiones en cuestión, sino también la evolución y el enriquecimiento de los argumentos teóricos en favor de la propuesta de Abney, que se asume como la más adecuada en la actualidad.No desenvolvimento da linguística moderna, é evidente a extraordinária relevância que o determinante da categoria lexical tem experimentado em detrimento dos outros constituintes da FN na consideração de seu status hierárquico, uma vez que passou de um elemento não nuclear (opcional ou obrigatório) na estruturação nominal na gramática gerativa (de acordo com Chomsky, Postal, Fillmore, etc.) para uma posição nuclear, geradora de sua própria projeção máxima, a frase determinativa, na gramática categorial (de acordo com Abney). Ao longo dos anos, de 1957 até a atualidade, sua posição foi se consolidando, como relatam as diversas versões da FN que se configuraram com o apoio das evidências linguísticas do momento. Daí o nosso interesse em examinar a sua impressionante evolução no quadro das duas correntes modernas: a generativa e a categorial. A análise das versões de Chomsky, Postal e Fillmore, e também a de Abney, como representantes mais destacados de ambas as gramáticas, permitir-nos-á conhecer não só as motivações teóricas que sustentaram as versões em questão, mas também a evolução e enriquecimento dos argumentos teóricos a favor da proposta de Abney, que se assume como a mais adequada na actualidade.Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas2002-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/2643510.15381/lengsoc.v1i4.26435Lengua y Sociedad; Núm. 4 (2002); 26-37Lengua y Sociedad; n. 4 (2002); 26-37Lengua y Sociedad; No. 4 (2002); 26-372413-26591729-972110.15381/lengsoc.v1i4reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstname:Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcosinstacron:UNMSMspahttps://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/lenguaysociedad/article/view/26435/20147Derechos de autor 2002 Jorge Esquivel Villafanahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/264352023-10-27T10:00:25Z |
| score |
13.856838 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).