Design and validation of an instrument to measure the level of knowledge in biosafety of dentist in times of COVID-19
Descripción del Articulo
        Objective: To design and validate an instrument to measure the level of knowledge of dental surgeons about biosafety in dental care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Descriptive and cross-sectional study. Initially, an instrument was developed based on a 41-item bibliographic review. Content va...
              
            
    
                        | Autores: | , , | 
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo | 
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 | 
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann | 
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann | 
| Lenguaje: | español | 
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.unjbg.edu.pe:article/1084 | 
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/rob/article/view/1084 | 
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto | 
| Materia: | estudio de validación infecciones por coronavirus conocimiento  | 
| id | 
                  REVUNJBG_1931e8f84e4d2708e0e096fb16bf0bb6 | 
    
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str | 
                  oai:revistas.unjbg.edu.pe:article/1084 | 
    
| network_acronym_str | 
                  REVUNJBG | 
    
| network_name_str | 
                  Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann | 
    
| repository_id_str | 
                   | 
    
| spelling | 
                  Design and validation of an instrument to measure the level of knowledge in biosafety of dentist in times of COVID-19Diseño y validación de un instrumento para medir el nivel de conocimientos en bioseguridad de odontólogos en tiempos de COVID-19Mezarina Mendoza , Jhon Paul IakovMontenegro Muñoz, Shirley Ivon Carrasco Freitas, María Del Carmen estudio de validacióninfecciones por coronavirusconocimientoObjective: To design and validate an instrument to measure the level of knowledge of dental surgeons about biosafety in dental care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Descriptive and cross-sectional study. Initially, an instrument was developed based on a 41-item bibliographic review. Content validation was carried out through the “expert judgment”. Five judges were selected who reviewed the formulation of the questions according to the criteria of relevance and clarity. Through the Aiken V test, 31 statements were obtained with the gathering of observations. Reliability was evaluated using a pilot test, with internal consistency determined with the Kuder Richardson test. Results: Two pilot tests were carried out, both groups were made up of 30 dentists including specialists and generals, as well as masters. In the first pilot a value of 0.519 was obtained in the Kuder Richardson coefficient, for which observations were raised, and in the second pilot study the value was 0.714, this value being considered adequate. Conclusion: The results obtained by the different ways to evaluate the test were adequate, obtaining an instrument of 22 items divided into five dimensions.Objetivo: Diseñar y validar un instrumento para medir el nivel de conocimientos de los cirujanos dentistas sobre las medidas de bioseguridad en la atención odontológica durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Métodos: Estudio de tipo descriptivo y de corte transversal. Inicialmente se elaboró un instrumento basado en revisión bibliográfica de 41 ítems. La validación de contenido se realizó a través del “juicio de expertos”. Se seleccionaron 5 jueces, quienes revisaron el planteamiento de las preguntas según los criterios de pertinencia, relevancia y claridad. A través de la prueba V de Aiken se obtuvo, con el levantamiento de observaciones, 31 enunciados. La fiabilidad se evaluó mediante una prueba piloto, a través de la consistencia interna que se determinó con la prueba Kuder Richardson. Resultados: Se realizaron dos pruebas piloto; ambos grupos estuvieron compuestos por 30 odontólogos, entre especialistas y generales, además de magísteres. En el primer piloto se obtuvo un valor de 0.519 en el coeficiente Kuder Richardson, por lo que se levantaron observaciones, y en el segundo estudio piloto el valor fue de 0.714; siendo este valor considerado adecuado. Conclusión: El resultado obtenido por las diferentes vías para evaluar el test fue adecuado, consiguiendo un instrumento de 22 ítems, dividido en cinco dimensiones; siendo que es válido y confiable, justificando su uso y aplicación en el ámbito investigativo.Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann2021-06-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/rob/article/view/108410.33326/26644649.2021.5.1.1084Revista Odontológica Basadrina; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2021): Revista Odontológica Basadrina; 19-302664-46492664-121610.33326/26644649.2021.5.1reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmanninstname:Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmanninstacron:UNJBGspahttps://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/rob/article/view/1084/1190Derechos de autor 2021 Jhon Paul Iakov Mezarina Mendoza, Shirley Ivon Montenegro Muñoz y María Del Carmen Carrasco Freitashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.esinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.unjbg.edu.pe:article/10842021-09-17T18:33:30Z | 
    
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  Design and validation of an instrument to measure the level of knowledge in biosafety of dentist in times of COVID-19 Diseño y validación de un instrumento para medir el nivel de conocimientos en bioseguridad de odontólogos en tiempos de COVID-19  | 
    
| title | 
                  Design and validation of an instrument to measure the level of knowledge in biosafety of dentist in times of COVID-19 | 
    
| spellingShingle | 
                  Design and validation of an instrument to measure the level of knowledge in biosafety of dentist in times of COVID-19 Mezarina Mendoza , Jhon Paul Iakov estudio de validación infecciones por coronavirus conocimiento  | 
    
| title_short | 
                  Design and validation of an instrument to measure the level of knowledge in biosafety of dentist in times of COVID-19 | 
    
| title_full | 
                  Design and validation of an instrument to measure the level of knowledge in biosafety of dentist in times of COVID-19 | 
    
| title_fullStr | 
                  Design and validation of an instrument to measure the level of knowledge in biosafety of dentist in times of COVID-19 | 
    
| title_full_unstemmed | 
                  Design and validation of an instrument to measure the level of knowledge in biosafety of dentist in times of COVID-19 | 
    
| title_sort | 
                  Design and validation of an instrument to measure the level of knowledge in biosafety of dentist in times of COVID-19 | 
    
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  Mezarina Mendoza , Jhon Paul Iakov Montenegro Muñoz, Shirley Ivon Carrasco Freitas, María Del Carmen  | 
    
| author | 
                  Mezarina Mendoza , Jhon Paul Iakov | 
    
| author_facet | 
                  Mezarina Mendoza , Jhon Paul Iakov Montenegro Muñoz, Shirley Ivon Carrasco Freitas, María Del Carmen  | 
    
| author_role | 
                  author | 
    
| author2 | 
                  Montenegro Muñoz, Shirley Ivon Carrasco Freitas, María Del Carmen  | 
    
| author2_role | 
                  author author  | 
    
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  estudio de validación infecciones por coronavirus conocimiento  | 
    
| topic | 
                  estudio de validación infecciones por coronavirus conocimiento  | 
    
| description | 
                  Objective: To design and validate an instrument to measure the level of knowledge of dental surgeons about biosafety in dental care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Descriptive and cross-sectional study. Initially, an instrument was developed based on a 41-item bibliographic review. Content validation was carried out through the “expert judgment”. Five judges were selected who reviewed the formulation of the questions according to the criteria of relevance and clarity. Through the Aiken V test, 31 statements were obtained with the gathering of observations. Reliability was evaluated using a pilot test, with internal consistency determined with the Kuder Richardson test. Results: Two pilot tests were carried out, both groups were made up of 30 dentists including specialists and generals, as well as masters. In the first pilot a value of 0.519 was obtained in the Kuder Richardson coefficient, for which observations were raised, and in the second pilot study the value was 0.714, this value being considered adequate. Conclusion: The results obtained by the different ways to evaluate the test were adequate, obtaining an instrument of 22 items divided into five dimensions. | 
    
| publishDate | 
                  2021 | 
    
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  2021-06-11 | 
    
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  | 
    
| format | 
                  article | 
    
| status_str | 
                  publishedVersion | 
    
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/rob/article/view/1084 10.33326/26644649.2021.5.1.1084  | 
    
| url | 
                  https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/rob/article/view/1084 | 
    
| identifier_str_mv | 
                  10.33326/26644649.2021.5.1.1084 | 
    
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  spa | 
    
| language | 
                  spa | 
    
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  https://revistas.unjbg.edu.pe/index.php/rob/article/view/1084/1190 | 
    
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  | 
    
| rights_invalid_str_mv | 
                  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es | 
    
| eu_rights_str_mv | 
                  openAccess | 
    
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  application/pdf | 
    
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann | 
    
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann | 
    
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | 
                  Revista Odontológica Basadrina; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2021): Revista Odontológica Basadrina; 19-30 2664-4649 2664-1216 10.33326/26644649.2021.5.1 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann instname:Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann instacron:UNJBG  | 
    
| instname_str | 
                  Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann | 
    
| instacron_str | 
                  UNJBG | 
    
| institution | 
                  UNJBG | 
    
| reponame_str | 
                  Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann | 
    
| collection | 
                  Revistas - Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann | 
    
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | 
                   | 
    
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | 
                   | 
    
| _version_ | 
                  1847698981401919488 | 
    
| score | 
                  13.130007 | 
    
 Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
    La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).