Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading

Descripción del Articulo

In this article the author develops the regulation that corresponds to the "food" among the cohabitants and the inconsistencies reflected in our legal system. He argues that neither the constituent of 1979 nor the legislator of our civil law of 1984 wanted to recognize a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Vega Mere, Yuri
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/1224
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/1224
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Alimentos, convivientes, deberes, familia, parejas de hecho
Food, cohabitants, duties, family, de facto couples
id REVUNIFE_c8e34a592eb3908740aea32eebf9601d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/1224
network_acronym_str REVUNIFE
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
repository_id_str
spelling Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different readingAlimentos entre convivientes: de deber natural a deber constitucional. Una lectura diferente.Vega Mere, YuriAlimentos, convivientes, deberes, familia, parejas de hechoFood, cohabitants, duties, family, de facto couplesIn this article the author develops the regulation that corresponds to the "food" among the cohabitants and the inconsistencies reflected in our legal system. He argues that neither the constituent of 1979 nor the legislator of our civil law of 1984 wanted to recognize a full family status for unmarried couples and that this is absurd given that the granting of a patrimonial regime did not fall into a vacuum nor was it consecrated for an entelechy or an ethereal being: it was conceived for an unmarried couple that was (and is) openly a family, most of the times integrated by the concubines and by their descendants. It raises an interesting question that will be outlined in the present article, which is the following: how did this restriction of the normative regime affect de facto unions?En el presente artículo el autor desarrolla la regulación que le corresponde a los “alimentos” entre los convivientes y las inconsistencias plasmadas en nuestro ordenamiento legal. Sostiene que ni el constituyente de 1979 ni el legislador de nuestra ley civil de 1984 quisieron reconocer un estatus pleno de familia a lasparejas de hecho y que ello resulta un absurdo dado que la concesión de un régimen patrimonial no caía en el vacío ni fue consagrado para una entelequia o un ente etéreo: fue concebido para una pareja no casada que era (y es) abiertamente una familia, las más de las veces integrada por los concubinos y por susdescendientes. Plantea una interrogante interesante que irá esbozando en el presente artículo, que es la siguiente ¿cómo afectaba esta restricción del régimen normativo a las uniones de hecho?.LumenLumen2018-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/122410.33539/lumen.2018.v14n2.1224Lumen; No. 14 - II (2018): Lumen: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; 240-254Lumen; Núm. 14 - II (2018): Lumen: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; 240-2542708-50312225-0840reponame:Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazóninstname:Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazóninstacron:UNIFEspahttps://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/1224/1249Derechos de autor 2018 Yuri Vega Mereinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/12242021-10-28T20:56:04Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading
Alimentos entre convivientes: de deber natural a deber constitucional. Una lectura diferente.
title Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading
spellingShingle Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading
Vega Mere, Yuri
Alimentos, convivientes, deberes, familia, parejas de hecho
Food, cohabitants, duties, family, de facto couples
title_short Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading
title_full Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading
title_fullStr Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading
title_full_unstemmed Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading
title_sort Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vega Mere, Yuri
author Vega Mere, Yuri
author_facet Vega Mere, Yuri
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Alimentos, convivientes, deberes, familia, parejas de hecho
Food, cohabitants, duties, family, de facto couples
topic Alimentos, convivientes, deberes, familia, parejas de hecho
Food, cohabitants, duties, family, de facto couples
description In this article the author develops the regulation that corresponds to the "food" among the cohabitants and the inconsistencies reflected in our legal system. He argues that neither the constituent of 1979 nor the legislator of our civil law of 1984 wanted to recognize a full family status for unmarried couples and that this is absurd given that the granting of a patrimonial regime did not fall into a vacuum nor was it consecrated for an entelechy or an ethereal being: it was conceived for an unmarried couple that was (and is) openly a family, most of the times integrated by the concubines and by their descendants. It raises an interesting question that will be outlined in the present article, which is the following: how did this restriction of the normative regime affect de facto unions?
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/1224
10.33539/lumen.2018.v14n2.1224
url https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/1224
identifier_str_mv 10.33539/lumen.2018.v14n2.1224
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/1224/1249
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Yuri Vega Mere
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Yuri Vega Mere
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lumen
Lumen
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lumen
Lumen
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Lumen; No. 14 - II (2018): Lumen: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; 240-254
Lumen; Núm. 14 - II (2018): Lumen: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; 240-254
2708-5031
2225-0840
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
instname:Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
instacron:UNIFE
instname_str Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
instacron_str UNIFE
institution UNIFE
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
collection Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1845705720016666625
score 13.887938
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).