Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading
Descripción del Articulo
In this article the author develops the regulation that corresponds to the "food" among the cohabitants and the inconsistencies reflected in our legal system. He argues that neither the constituent of 1979 nor the legislator of our civil law of 1984 wanted to recognize a...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2018 |
Institución: | Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/1224 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/1224 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Alimentos, convivientes, deberes, familia, parejas de hecho Food, cohabitants, duties, family, de facto couples |
id |
REVUNIFE_c8e34a592eb3908740aea32eebf9601d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/1224 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUNIFE |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different readingAlimentos entre convivientes: de deber natural a deber constitucional. Una lectura diferente.Vega Mere, YuriAlimentos, convivientes, deberes, familia, parejas de hechoFood, cohabitants, duties, family, de facto couplesIn this article the author develops the regulation that corresponds to the "food" among the cohabitants and the inconsistencies reflected in our legal system. He argues that neither the constituent of 1979 nor the legislator of our civil law of 1984 wanted to recognize a full family status for unmarried couples and that this is absurd given that the granting of a patrimonial regime did not fall into a vacuum nor was it consecrated for an entelechy or an ethereal being: it was conceived for an unmarried couple that was (and is) openly a family, most of the times integrated by the concubines and by their descendants. It raises an interesting question that will be outlined in the present article, which is the following: how did this restriction of the normative regime affect de facto unions?En el presente artículo el autor desarrolla la regulación que le corresponde a los “alimentos” entre los convivientes y las inconsistencias plasmadas en nuestro ordenamiento legal. Sostiene que ni el constituyente de 1979 ni el legislador de nuestra ley civil de 1984 quisieron reconocer un estatus pleno de familia a lasparejas de hecho y que ello resulta un absurdo dado que la concesión de un régimen patrimonial no caía en el vacío ni fue consagrado para una entelequia o un ente etéreo: fue concebido para una pareja no casada que era (y es) abiertamente una familia, las más de las veces integrada por los concubinos y por susdescendientes. Plantea una interrogante interesante que irá esbozando en el presente artículo, que es la siguiente ¿cómo afectaba esta restricción del régimen normativo a las uniones de hecho?.LumenLumen2018-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/122410.33539/lumen.2018.v14n2.1224Lumen; No. 14 - II (2018): Lumen: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; 240-254Lumen; Núm. 14 - II (2018): Lumen: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; 240-2542708-50312225-0840reponame:Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazóninstname:Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazóninstacron:UNIFEspahttps://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/1224/1249Derechos de autor 2018 Yuri Vega Mereinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/12242021-10-28T20:56:04Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading Alimentos entre convivientes: de deber natural a deber constitucional. Una lectura diferente. |
title |
Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading |
spellingShingle |
Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading Vega Mere, Yuri Alimentos, convivientes, deberes, familia, parejas de hecho Food, cohabitants, duties, family, de facto couples |
title_short |
Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading |
title_full |
Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading |
title_fullStr |
Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading |
title_full_unstemmed |
Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading |
title_sort |
Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Vega Mere, Yuri |
author |
Vega Mere, Yuri |
author_facet |
Vega Mere, Yuri |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Alimentos, convivientes, deberes, familia, parejas de hecho Food, cohabitants, duties, family, de facto couples |
topic |
Alimentos, convivientes, deberes, familia, parejas de hecho Food, cohabitants, duties, family, de facto couples |
description |
In this article the author develops the regulation that corresponds to the "food" among the cohabitants and the inconsistencies reflected in our legal system. He argues that neither the constituent of 1979 nor the legislator of our civil law of 1984 wanted to recognize a full family status for unmarried couples and that this is absurd given that the granting of a patrimonial regime did not fall into a vacuum nor was it consecrated for an entelechy or an ethereal being: it was conceived for an unmarried couple that was (and is) openly a family, most of the times integrated by the concubines and by their descendants. It raises an interesting question that will be outlined in the present article, which is the following: how did this restriction of the normative regime affect de facto unions? |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-30 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/1224 10.33539/lumen.2018.v14n2.1224 |
url |
https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/1224 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33539/lumen.2018.v14n2.1224 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/1224/1249 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 Yuri Vega Mere info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 Yuri Vega Mere |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Lumen Lumen |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Lumen Lumen |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Lumen; No. 14 - II (2018): Lumen: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; 240-254 Lumen; Núm. 14 - II (2018): Lumen: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; 240-254 2708-5031 2225-0840 reponame:Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón instname:Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón instacron:UNIFE |
instname_str |
Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón |
instacron_str |
UNIFE |
institution |
UNIFE |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón |
collection |
Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1845705720016666625 |
score |
13.887938 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).