Naive freedom. Against the compatibilist perspectivism of Spinoza and Dennett

Descripción del Articulo

This paper criticizes a kind of compatibilism: the perspectivism, which can be tracked fromBaruch Spinoza –controversially in his case in modernity to Daniel Dennett in now days. This compatibilism states reality can be expressed or read from several perspectives, which do not cancel each other, but...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ibañez Blancas, Franklin Ernesto, Portugal Velasco, Giancarlo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/3168
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/phainomenon/article/view/3168
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Spinoza
Dennett
Compatibilismo
Determinismo
Libertad
Compatibilism
Determinism
Freedom
Descripción
Sumario:This paper criticizes a kind of compatibilism: the perspectivism, which can be tracked fromBaruch Spinoza –controversially in his case in modernity to Daniel Dennett in now days. This compatibilism states reality can be expressed or read from several perspectives, which do not cancel each other, but coexist. From one of those perspectives, determinism is a logical conclusion. From other perspective, at the same time, freedom exists plausibly. The paper argues that both authors subscribe an ontology  a materialism with a unique substance which entails the possibility of a privileged deterministic perspective that invalidates freedom.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).