Axiological analysis of the construction and validation of an edumetric documentary instrument
Descripción del Articulo
Abstract Educational research presents certain biases in what is referred to the construction of an edumetric documentary instrument and its validation process. This may be due to the lack of axiological awareness from some researchers, thesis experts, advisors and expert judges who have the moral o...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Huanta |
| Repositorio: | Puriq |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs2.www.revistas.unah.edu.pe:article/81 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/81 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Axiología instrumento validación edumétrico Axiology instrument validation edumetric Axiologia validação edumetria |
| id |
REVUNAH_54262068f89b010e6a32ff2a043fa354 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.www.revistas.unah.edu.pe:article/81 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVUNAH |
| network_name_str |
Puriq |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Axiological analysis of the construction and validation of an edumetric documentary instrument Análisis axiológico de la construcción y validación de un instrumento documental edumétrico Análise axiológica da construção e validação de um instrumento documental edumétrico |
| title |
Axiological analysis of the construction and validation of an edumetric documentary instrument |
| spellingShingle |
Axiological analysis of the construction and validation of an edumetric documentary instrument Paucca Gonzales, Nelson Axiología instrumento validación edumétrico Axiology instrument validation edumetric Axiologia instrumento validação edumetria |
| title_short |
Axiological analysis of the construction and validation of an edumetric documentary instrument |
| title_full |
Axiological analysis of the construction and validation of an edumetric documentary instrument |
| title_fullStr |
Axiological analysis of the construction and validation of an edumetric documentary instrument |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Axiological analysis of the construction and validation of an edumetric documentary instrument |
| title_sort |
Axiological analysis of the construction and validation of an edumetric documentary instrument |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Paucca Gonzales, Nelson Rafayle Cuadra, Rusbel Jhon Andrade Torre, Judy Andrea |
| author |
Paucca Gonzales, Nelson |
| author_facet |
Paucca Gonzales, Nelson Rafayle Cuadra, Rusbel Jhon Andrade Torre, Judy Andrea |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Rafayle Cuadra, Rusbel Jhon Andrade Torre, Judy Andrea |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Axiología instrumento validación edumétrico Axiology instrument validation edumetric Axiologia instrumento validação edumetria |
| topic |
Axiología instrumento validación edumétrico Axiology instrument validation edumetric Axiologia instrumento validação edumetria |
| description |
Abstract Educational research presents certain biases in what is referred to the construction of an edumetric documentary instrument and its validation process. This may be due to the lack of axiological awareness from some researchers, thesis experts, advisors and expert judges who have the moral obligation to validate the instrument through its items. To summarize what has been exposed previously the following objective is proposed; to notice the lack of ethics and morality of the people involved in the construction and validation process of an edumentric instrument. The analysis of the scientific article corresponds to the analytical - hermeneutical method in what is referred to the qualitative approach and the instrumental studies method in what is referred to the quantitative method. The hermeneutical method has allowed the strict analysis of the role of those who were mentioned before. The results discussion has established the differences between the construction of a psychometric and edumetric instrument, the second one is built due to the lack of previous studies and its validation follows the formulated theories in function to the variables and dimensions. Finally, it is concluded that the people involved in the edumetric construction lack axiological praxis. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-09 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/81 10.37073/puriq.2.2.81 |
| url |
https://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/81 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.37073/puriq.2.2.81 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/81/181 https://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/81/551 https://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/81/552 https://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/81/193 10.37073/puriq.2.2.81.g181 10.37073/puriq.2.81.g551 10.37073/puriq.2.81.g552 10.37073/puriq.2.2.81.g193 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html text/xml application/zip |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Huanta |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Huanta |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Puriq; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): PURIQ (May-August); 56-67 Puriq; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2020): PURIQ (mayo-agosto); 56-67 Puriq; v. 2 n. 2 (2020): PURIQ (maio-agosto); 56-67 2707-3602 2664-4029 10.37073/puriq.2.2.2020 reponame:Puriq instname:Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Huanta instacron:UNAH |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Huanta |
| instacron_str |
UNAH |
| institution |
UNAH |
| reponame_str |
Puriq |
| collection |
Puriq |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1845613139649888256 |
| spelling |
Axiological analysis of the construction and validation of an edumetric documentary instrumentAnálisis axiológico de la construcción y validación de un instrumento documental edumétricoAnálise axiológica da construção e validação de um instrumento documental edumétricoPaucca Gonzales, NelsonRafayle Cuadra, Rusbel JhonAndrade Torre, Judy AndreaAxiologíainstrumentovalidaciónedumétricoAxiologyinstrumentvalidationedumetricAxiologiainstrumentovalidaçãoedumetriaAbstract Educational research presents certain biases in what is referred to the construction of an edumetric documentary instrument and its validation process. This may be due to the lack of axiological awareness from some researchers, thesis experts, advisors and expert judges who have the moral obligation to validate the instrument through its items. To summarize what has been exposed previously the following objective is proposed; to notice the lack of ethics and morality of the people involved in the construction and validation process of an edumentric instrument. The analysis of the scientific article corresponds to the analytical - hermeneutical method in what is referred to the qualitative approach and the instrumental studies method in what is referred to the quantitative method. The hermeneutical method has allowed the strict analysis of the role of those who were mentioned before. The results discussion has established the differences between the construction of a psychometric and edumetric instrument, the second one is built due to the lack of previous studies and its validation follows the formulated theories in function to the variables and dimensions. Finally, it is concluded that the people involved in the edumetric construction lack axiological praxis.La investigación educativa, presenta ciertos sesgos en lo que respecta a la construcción de un instrumento documental de tipo edumétrico y la validación. Esta se debe, a la falta de toma de conciencia axiológica de parte de algunos investigadores, tesistas, asesores y jueces expertos que tienen la obligación de validar el instrumento formulado a través de los ítems. En función al acápite enunciado en líneas anteriores se formula el siguiente objetivo; elucidar la falta de praxis de la ética y moral de las personas involucradas en el proceso de la construcción y validación de un instrumento edumétrico. El análisis del artículo científico corresponde al método analítico – hermenéutico en lo que respecta al enfoque cualitativo y al método estudios instrumentales para el caso del enfoque cuantitativo. El método hermenéutico ha permitido analizar de manera rigurosa el papel que cumplieron las personas mencionadas anteriormente. También, se ha establecido las diferencias de manera categórica entre la construcción de un instrumento de tipo psicométrico y el de tipo edumétrico, esta última se construye a falta de los antecedentes de la investigación a desarrollar y su validez obedece a las teorías formuladas en función a las variables y dimensiones. Finalmente se concluye que las personas involucradas en la construcción edumétrica carecen de la praxis axiológica. A pesquisa educacional tem certos preconceitos com relação à construção de um instrumento documental do tipo edumétrico e sua validação. Isto se deve à falta de consciência axiológica por parte de alguns pesquisadores, estudantes de tese, consultores e juízes especialistas que têm a obrigação de validar o instrumento formulado através dos itens. Com base no acima exposto, é formulado o seguinte objetivo: elucidar a falta de prática ética e moral das pessoas envolvidas no processo de construção e validação de um instrumento edumétrico. A análise do artigo científico corresponde ao método analítico-hermenêutico para a abordagem qualitativa e ao método de estudos instrumentais para a abordagem quantitativa. O método hermenêutico tem permitido uma análise rigorosa do papel desempenhado pelas pessoas mencionadas acima. Além disso, as diferenças foram estabelecidas de forma categórica entre a construção de um instrumento do tipo psicométrico e do tipo edumétrico, este último é construído na ausência do contexto da pesquisa a ser desenvolvida e sua validade obedece às teorias formuladas de acordo com as variáveis e dimensões. Finalmente, conclui-se que as pessoas envolvidas na construção edumétrica carecem de praxis axiológica. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Huanta2020-04-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlapplication/ziphttps://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/8110.37073/puriq.2.2.81Puriq; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): PURIQ (May-August); 56-67Puriq; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2020): PURIQ (mayo-agosto); 56-67Puriq; v. 2 n. 2 (2020): PURIQ (maio-agosto); 56-672707-36022664-402910.37073/puriq.2.2.2020reponame:Puriqinstname:Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Huantainstacron:UNAHspahttps://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/81/181https://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/81/551https://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/81/552https://www.revistas.unah.edu.pe/index.php/puriq/article/view/81/19310.37073/puriq.2.2.81.g18110.37073/puriq.2.81.g55110.37073/puriq.2.81.g55210.37073/puriq.2.2.81.g193Derechos de autor 2020 Nelson Paucca Gonzales, Rusbel Jhon Rafayle Cuadra , Judy Andrea Andrade Torrehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.www.revistas.unah.edu.pe:article/812022-09-26T17:06:04Z |
| score |
12.789326 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
