Certainties and myths in Education

Descripción del Articulo

This article aims to identify and describe some common beliefs—truths—and myths or misconceptions in the collective imagination of teachers and society in general. Both these beliefs and myths have been compared with those of educational theorists and confirmed by my own pedagogical experience over...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Latorre Ariño, Marino
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Universidad Marcelino Champagnat
Repositorio:Revista educa UMCH
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.umch.edu.pe:article/4
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.umch.edu.pe/index.php/EducaUMCH/article/view/4
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Educación
Sociedad
Docentes
Education
Society
Docents
id REVUMCH_11dbad17b4341d7edd381a0dcc89b1f0
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.umch.edu.pe:article/4
network_acronym_str REVUMCH
network_name_str Revista educa UMCH
repository_id_str .
spelling Certainties and myths in EducationCertezas y mitos en EducaciónLatorre Ariño, MarinoLatorre Ariño, MarinoEducaciónSociedadDocentesEducationSocietyDocentsThis article aims to identify and describe some common beliefs—truths—and myths or misconceptions in the collective imagination of teachers and society in general. Both these beliefs and myths have been compared with those of educational theorists and confirmed by my own pedagogical experience over decades of teaching in primary and higher education. I describe twelve beliefs and nine myths to emphasize the positive aspects of pedagogical intervention and reveal the errors made in the desire to stay current with pedagogical innovations. The first two beliefs are essential: “Without understanding there is no learning”—meaningful learning—and “learning is acquired by doing what needs to be learned”—functional learning. Regarding myths in education, I would point out, among others, "the pedagogical value of the lecture," the belief that "memorization exams measure learning," "the more technology in the classroom, the more learning," and "the use of the multiple intelligences palette as a pedagogical methodology."El artículo trata de identificar y describir algunas certezas –aciertos-- y mitos o errores frecuentes en el imaginario colectivo de los docentes y de la sociedad, en general. Tanto las certezas como los mitos han sido contrastados con los teóricos de la educación y confirmados por mi propia experiencia pedagógica durante décadas de actividad docente, en EBR y en Educación Superior. Describo doce certezas y nueve mitos para insistir en los aspectos positivos de la intervención pedagógica y desvelar los errores en los que se incurre con el deseo de estar al día en innovaciones pedagógicas. La primera y segunda certezas son esenciales: “Sin comprensión no hay aprendizaje” --aprendizaje significativo-- y “a aprender se aprende haciendo lo que hay que aprender --aprendizaje funcional--”. En cuanto a los mitos en educación señalo, entre otros, “el valor pedagógico de la clase magistral”, la creencia que “los exámenes memorísticos miden el aprendizaje”, “cuanto más tecnología en el aula, más aprendizaje” y “el uso de la paleta de las inteligencias múltiples como una metodología pedagógica”.  Universidad Marcelino Champagnat2017-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.umch.edu.pe/index.php/EducaUMCH/article/view/410.35756/educaumch.201710.4EDUCA UMCH Journal; No. 10 (2017): Journal EDUCA UMCH N°10 2017 (july - december); 7-25Revista EDUCA UMCH; Núm. 10 (2017): Revista EDUCA UMCH N°10 2017 (julio - diciembre); 7-252617-03372617-808710.35756/educaumch.201710reponame:Revista educa UMCHinstname:Universidad Marcelino Champagnatinstacron:UMCHspahttps://revistas.umch.edu.pe/index.php/EducaUMCH/article/view/4/510.35756/educaumch.201710.4.5Derechos de autor 2016 Marino Latorre Ariñohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.umch.edu.pe:article/42025-11-03T15:47:29Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Certainties and myths in Education
Certezas y mitos en Educación
title Certainties and myths in Education
spellingShingle Certainties and myths in Education
Latorre Ariño, Marino
Educación
Sociedad
Docentes
Education
Society
Docents
title_short Certainties and myths in Education
title_full Certainties and myths in Education
title_fullStr Certainties and myths in Education
title_full_unstemmed Certainties and myths in Education
title_sort Certainties and myths in Education
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Latorre Ariño, Marino
Latorre Ariño, Marino
author Latorre Ariño, Marino
author_facet Latorre Ariño, Marino
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Educación
Sociedad
Docentes
Education
Society
Docents
topic Educación
Sociedad
Docentes
Education
Society
Docents
description This article aims to identify and describe some common beliefs—truths—and myths or misconceptions in the collective imagination of teachers and society in general. Both these beliefs and myths have been compared with those of educational theorists and confirmed by my own pedagogical experience over decades of teaching in primary and higher education. I describe twelve beliefs and nine myths to emphasize the positive aspects of pedagogical intervention and reveal the errors made in the desire to stay current with pedagogical innovations. The first two beliefs are essential: “Without understanding there is no learning”—meaningful learning—and “learning is acquired by doing what needs to be learned”—functional learning. Regarding myths in education, I would point out, among others, "the pedagogical value of the lecture," the belief that "memorization exams measure learning," "the more technology in the classroom, the more learning," and "the use of the multiple intelligences palette as a pedagogical methodology."
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-11-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.umch.edu.pe/index.php/EducaUMCH/article/view/4
10.35756/educaumch.201710.4
url https://revistas.umch.edu.pe/index.php/EducaUMCH/article/view/4
identifier_str_mv 10.35756/educaumch.201710.4
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.umch.edu.pe/index.php/EducaUMCH/article/view/4/5
10.35756/educaumch.201710.4.5
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Marino Latorre Ariño
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Marino Latorre Ariño
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Marcelino Champagnat
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Marcelino Champagnat
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv EDUCA UMCH Journal; No. 10 (2017): Journal EDUCA UMCH N°10 2017 (july - december); 7-25
Revista EDUCA UMCH; Núm. 10 (2017): Revista EDUCA UMCH N°10 2017 (julio - diciembre); 7-25
2617-0337
2617-8087
10.35756/educaumch.201710
reponame:Revista educa UMCH
instname:Universidad Marcelino Champagnat
instacron:UMCH
instname_str Universidad Marcelino Champagnat
instacron_str UMCH
institution UMCH
reponame_str Revista educa UMCH
collection Revista educa UMCH
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1848690584344068096
score 13.137912
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).