Characteristics of Misinformation in Social Networks. Comparative Study of the Hoaxs Denied in Argentina and Spain during 2020

Descripción del Articulo

This paper studies the main features of fake news that circulated on social networks in Argentina and Spain during 2020, as well as their similarities and differences. The study carries out a content analysis of seven variables in 402 hoaxes that were debunked in both countries by the fact-checking...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Gamir-Ríos, José, Tarullo, Raquel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad de Lima
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad de Lima
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.ulima.edu.pe:article/5343
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/contratexto/article/view/5343
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:disinformation
polarization
populism
Argentina
Spain
desinformación
polarización
populismo
España
desinformação
polarização
Espanha
Descripción
Sumario:This paper studies the main features of fake news that circulated on social networks in Argentina and Spain during 2020, as well as their similarities and differences. The study carries out a content analysis of seven variables in 402 hoaxes that were debunked in both countries by the fact-checking platforms Chequeado and Newtral. Specifically, this article examines the sources of disinformation and their typologies, their main characters and their attributes, thematic affiliation, the emotions they appeal to, and the populist traits they represent. The results show the predominance of (a) anonymous sources in both countries, real media sources in Argentina and impersonated political entities in Spain; (b) deception as a form of disinformation; (c) the focus on the political class, almost always associated with negative attributes; (d) health as the central theme, an aspect derived from the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by the quality of democracy in Argentina and by consumption and personal political issues in Spain; (e) the appeal to negative emotions, especially anger and fear, both typical of negative affective polarization; and (f) the attack on elites and the defense of citizens’ interests as populist discursive features.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).