What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)
Descripción del Articulo
This article analyses the complete history of the Facebook forum on Big Brother Spain during 2011-2019. For this study, more than 1.2 million Facebook comments were retrieved, and later thematic patterns from these units of content were identified and analysed. It examines what...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2023 |
Institución: | Universidad de Piura |
Repositorio: | Revista de Comunicación |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/3304 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/3304 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | redes sociales feminismo reality show Facebook; Gran Hermano social media feminism; Big Bro Big Brother |
id |
REVUDEP_3d9f17758650adc22e3df3110433edf0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/3304 |
network_acronym_str |
REVUDEP |
network_name_str |
Revista de Comunicación |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019)¿Qué se comenta de un reality? Análisis del foro en Facebook de Gran Hermano España (2011- 2019)Cabeza, José Casado, Raúl Paz, María Antonia redes socialesfeminismoreality showFacebook;Gran Hermanosocial mediafeminism;reality showFacebook;Big BroBig Brother This article analyses the complete history of the Facebook forum on Big Brother Spain during 2011-2019. For this study, more than 1.2 million Facebook comments were retrieved, and later thematic patterns from these units of content were identified and analysed. It examines what the most recurrent issues the fans talk about, and their standpoint on those. Forum participants accept and fully participate in the logic of the program (both its mechanics and its end goal), but sometimes mistrust and question the broadcaster’s impartiality when they consider that the network is meddling in the reality for commercial purposes. Yet any censorship made by the program on events which may hurt its image goes unnoticed. Viewers, largely women, criticize female contestants three times (2.79) more than men. However, there is also a degree of gender alliance between forum members and female contestants, as these receive more support to win the contest. Este artículo analiza el historial completo del foro de Facebook de Gran Hermano España durante el período 2011-2019. En el estudio se obtuvieron más de 1,2 millones de comentarios del grupo de Facebook. Se investiga cuáles son los temas más recurrentes de los que hablan los fans del programa y cuál es su posición ante ellos. Los participantes aceptan la lógica del reality (mecánica y objetivo final), pero a veces cuestionan la imparcialidad de la cadena si aprecian que interviene en la realidad para obtener una ventaja comercial. Sin embargo, pasa inadvertida la censura que ejerce el programa sobre los comentarios de sucesos que puedan dañar su imagen. Los espectadores, mayoritariamente de género femenino, critican tres veces más (2,79) a las mujeres concursantes que a los hombres. Sin embargo, también hay cierta alianza de género entre foristas y concursantes femeninas: se las apoya más a ellas para que ganen. Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación2023-06-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticle evaluated by pairsArtículo evaluado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/330410.26441/RC21.2-2022-A3Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022); 51-68Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2022); 51-682227-14651684-0933reponame:Revista de Comunicacióninstname:Universidad de Piurainstacron:UDEPspahttps://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/3304/2643https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/3304/2644Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Comunicaciónhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/33042023-06-10T08:10:02Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019) ¿Qué se comenta de un reality? Análisis del foro en Facebook de Gran Hermano España (2011- 2019) |
title |
What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019) |
spellingShingle |
What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019) Cabeza, José redes sociales feminismo reality show Facebook; Gran Hermano social media feminism; reality show Facebook; Big Bro Big Brother |
title_short |
What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019) |
title_full |
What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019) |
title_fullStr |
What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019) |
title_full_unstemmed |
What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019) |
title_sort |
What do people say about a reality show? Analysis of Spanish Big Brother’s Facebook comments (2011-2019) |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cabeza, José Casado, Raúl Paz, María Antonia |
author |
Cabeza, José |
author_facet |
Cabeza, José Casado, Raúl Paz, María Antonia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Casado, Raúl Paz, María Antonia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
redes sociales feminismo reality show Facebook; Gran Hermano social media feminism; reality show Facebook; Big Bro Big Brother |
topic |
redes sociales feminismo reality show Facebook; Gran Hermano social media feminism; reality show Facebook; Big Bro Big Brother |
description |
This article analyses the complete history of the Facebook forum on Big Brother Spain during 2011-2019. For this study, more than 1.2 million Facebook comments were retrieved, and later thematic patterns from these units of content were identified and analysed. It examines what the most recurrent issues the fans talk about, and their standpoint on those. Forum participants accept and fully participate in the logic of the program (both its mechanics and its end goal), but sometimes mistrust and question the broadcaster’s impartiality when they consider that the network is meddling in the reality for commercial purposes. Yet any censorship made by the program on events which may hurt its image goes unnoticed. Viewers, largely women, criticize female contestants three times (2.79) more than men. However, there is also a degree of gender alliance between forum members and female contestants, as these receive more support to win the contest. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Article evaluated by pairs Artículo evaluado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/3304 10.26441/RC21.2-2022-A3 |
url |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/3304 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26441/RC21.2-2022-A3 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/3304/2643 https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/3304/2644 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Comunicación http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Comunicación http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022); 51-68 Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2022); 51-68 2227-1465 1684-0933 reponame:Revista de Comunicación instname:Universidad de Piura instacron:UDEP |
instname_str |
Universidad de Piura |
instacron_str |
UDEP |
institution |
UDEP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Comunicación |
collection |
Revista de Comunicación |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1768518245083512832 |
score |
13.7211075 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).