Use of skeletal-related diagnostic methods in articles published from 2018 to 2020 in four major orthodontics journals

Descripción del Articulo

Objective: To determine the skeletal-related diagnostic methods most commonly used according to the four most important orthodontics journals in the period from 2018 to 2020. Methods: A review of the data available regarding the diagnostic procedures most frequently used to determine skeletal relati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: De los Ríos Fernández, Enrique Manuel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad Científica del Sur
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad Científica del Sur
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.cientifica.edu.pe:article/825
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.cientifica.edu.pe/index.php/odontologica/article/view/825
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:diagnóstico
relación esquelética
Diagnosis
Skeletal relationship
id REVUCS_42c76b350ad6d404477e8a9d2e2139ba
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.cientifica.edu.pe:article/825
network_acronym_str REVUCS
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad Científica del Sur
repository_id_str .
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of skeletal-related diagnostic methods in articles published from 2018 to 2020 in four major orthodontics journals
Uso de los métodos de diagnóstico de relación esquelética en los artículos publicados del 2018 al 2020 en las cuatro revistas más importantes de ortodoncia
title Use of skeletal-related diagnostic methods in articles published from 2018 to 2020 in four major orthodontics journals
spellingShingle Use of skeletal-related diagnostic methods in articles published from 2018 to 2020 in four major orthodontics journals
De los Ríos Fernández, Enrique Manuel
diagnóstico
relación esquelética
Diagnosis
Skeletal relationship
title_short Use of skeletal-related diagnostic methods in articles published from 2018 to 2020 in four major orthodontics journals
title_full Use of skeletal-related diagnostic methods in articles published from 2018 to 2020 in four major orthodontics journals
title_fullStr Use of skeletal-related diagnostic methods in articles published from 2018 to 2020 in four major orthodontics journals
title_full_unstemmed Use of skeletal-related diagnostic methods in articles published from 2018 to 2020 in four major orthodontics journals
title_sort Use of skeletal-related diagnostic methods in articles published from 2018 to 2020 in four major orthodontics journals
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv De los Ríos Fernández, Enrique Manuel
author De los Ríos Fernández, Enrique Manuel
author_facet De los Ríos Fernández, Enrique Manuel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv diagnóstico
relación esquelética
Diagnosis
Skeletal relationship
topic diagnóstico
relación esquelética
Diagnosis
Skeletal relationship
description Objective: To determine the skeletal-related diagnostic methods most commonly used according to the four most important orthodontics journals in the period from 2018 to 2020. Methods: A review of the data available regarding the diagnostic procedures most frequently used to determine skeletal relationships in the four most important orthodontics journals from 2018 to 2020. Article review was performed using SCIMAGO 2018, which provides a series of parameters ranking the importance of the impact of publications and journals. We made a synopsis of the information analyzed to establish a correlation and compare sources, and critically examined the articles collected on the subject of interest. An online bibliographic search of databases including mainly Medline was carried out, followed by evaluation and selection of the bibliography, organized according to the significance and nature of the study. Results: The four journals included in the bibliographic search were: AJODO, AO, EJO and KJO. The A point-Nasion-B point (ANB) method was used in 92.2% of the articles published in AJODO, and 7.8% did not describe the method used. Twenty-three articles in the AO journal were evaluated, all of which referred to the use of ANB as the method used. Finally, 16 and 11 articles from the EJO and KJO journals, respectively, were evaluated, with 93.8% and 95%, respectively of the articles using ANB as the method of choice for determining skeletal relationships. Conclusion: The method of choice for skeletal-related diagnostics is ANB, although this widely known method presents a risk of geometric effect.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.cientifica.edu.pe/index.php/odontologica/article/view/825
10.21142/2523-2754-0901-2021-041
url https://revistas.cientifica.edu.pe/index.php/odontologica/article/view/825
identifier_str_mv 10.21142/2523-2754-0901-2021-041
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.cientifica.edu.pe/index.php/odontologica/article/view/825/766
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Carrera de Estomatología de la Universidad Científica del Sur
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Carrera de Estomatología de la Universidad Científica del Sur
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Científica Odontológica; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2021); e041
Revista Científica Odontológica; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021); e041
2523-2754
2310-2594
reponame:Revistas - Universidad Científica del Sur
instname:Universidad Científica del Sur
instacron:CIENTÍFICA
instname_str Universidad Científica del Sur
instacron_str CIENTÍFICA
institution CIENTÍFICA
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad Científica del Sur
collection Revistas - Universidad Científica del Sur
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1853855622828654592
spelling Use of skeletal-related diagnostic methods in articles published from 2018 to 2020 in four major orthodontics journalsUso de los métodos de diagnóstico de relación esquelética en los artículos publicados del 2018 al 2020 en las cuatro revistas más importantes de ortodonciaDe los Ríos Fernández, Enrique Manueldiagnósticorelación esqueléticaDiagnosisSkeletal relationshipObjective: To determine the skeletal-related diagnostic methods most commonly used according to the four most important orthodontics journals in the period from 2018 to 2020. Methods: A review of the data available regarding the diagnostic procedures most frequently used to determine skeletal relationships in the four most important orthodontics journals from 2018 to 2020. Article review was performed using SCIMAGO 2018, which provides a series of parameters ranking the importance of the impact of publications and journals. We made a synopsis of the information analyzed to establish a correlation and compare sources, and critically examined the articles collected on the subject of interest. An online bibliographic search of databases including mainly Medline was carried out, followed by evaluation and selection of the bibliography, organized according to the significance and nature of the study. Results: The four journals included in the bibliographic search were: AJODO, AO, EJO and KJO. The A point-Nasion-B point (ANB) method was used in 92.2% of the articles published in AJODO, and 7.8% did not describe the method used. Twenty-three articles in the AO journal were evaluated, all of which referred to the use of ANB as the method used. Finally, 16 and 11 articles from the EJO and KJO journals, respectively, were evaluated, with 93.8% and 95%, respectively of the articles using ANB as the method of choice for determining skeletal relationships. Conclusion: The method of choice for skeletal-related diagnostics is ANB, although this widely known method presents a risk of geometric effect.Objetivo: Determinar el método de diagnóstico de relación esquelética más empleado, según las cuatro revistas más importantes de ortodoncia en el periodo 2018-2020. Metodología: Se elaboró un análisis documental de información compilada ya existente referida a los procedimientos de diagnóstico utilizados con mayor frecuencia en el reconocimiento de las relaciones esqueléticas en las cuatro revistas más importantes de ortodoncia desde el año 2018 hasta el 2020, según SCImago 2018, cuyo soporte en internet proporciona una serie de parámetros acerca del impacto de las publicaciones y revistas. Con esa finalidad, se realizó una sinopsis de la información analizada para establecer una correlación de las fuentes y hacer cotejos entre ellas de manera crítica. La exploración bibliográfica virtual de bases de datos se realizó esencialmente a través de Medline; se evaluó y seleccionó la bibliografía, organizada según la trascendencia y la índole científica; y, luego, se procesaron los resultados para responder las demandas de la investigación. Resultados: En la revista AJO-DO, el 92,2% utiliza el método de ANB y el 7,8% no describe el método utilizado. En la revista AO, el 100% refiere el uso del ANB. Finalmente, en las revistas EJO y KJO, el 93,8 % y el 95% utilizaron el ANB, respectivamente. Conclusión: El método más frecuentemente utilizado para la determinación de la relación esquelética es el ANB, aun cuando este indicador presenta un riesgo de efecto geométrico, ya que es un método ampliamente conocido.Carrera de Estomatología de la Universidad Científica del Sur2021-03-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.cientifica.edu.pe/index.php/odontologica/article/view/82510.21142/2523-2754-0901-2021-041Revista Científica Odontológica; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2021); e041Revista Científica Odontológica; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021); e0412523-27542310-2594reponame:Revistas - Universidad Científica del Surinstname:Universidad Científica del Surinstacron:CIENTÍFICAspahttps://revistas.cientifica.edu.pe/index.php/odontologica/article/view/825/766info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.cientifica.edu.pe:article/8252022-04-05T10:30:54Z
score 13.058026
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).