Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization

Descripción del Articulo

OBJETIVE: To determine the advantages of monopolar tubal electrocoagulation (ETM) as a method of surgical sterilization (EQ) permanent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 141 patients who attended the consultation planning famiíiar Maternity Clinic Santa Ana, Venezuelan Institute of Social Security, during the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Algara Urquiola, Luis
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/391
Enlace del recurso:http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVSPOG_c99fc0b01386fa3fc167d50c3f283732
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/391
network_acronym_str REVSPOG
network_name_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository_id_str .
spelling Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilizationElectrocoagulación tubárica monopolar con sección y remoción como método de esterilización quirúrgica permanenteAlgara Urquiola, LuisOBJETIVE: To determine the advantages of monopolar tubal electrocoagulation (ETM) as a method of surgical sterilization (EQ) permanent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 141 patients who attended the consultation planning famiíiar Maternity Clinic Santa Ana, Venezuelan Institute of Social Security, during the period April 2003 to August 2004, that application was practiced a method of EQ voluntary permanent. They were grouped randomly into two groups, experimental one of 71 patients (50.4%), whom he underwent voluntary permanent EQ by ETM technique with removal section (ETMSR) and one of 70 patients (49.6%) who he underwent voluntary permanent EQ by conventional techniques. RESULTS: The mean age was 32 ± 6 years with 67.4% between 28 and 39 years. There was no significant difference in the number of deeds (average of 4 ± 2.3). EQ experimental technique was used in all women in the first group and in the control group Pomeroy 41.1%, 22.9% Madlener, Parkland 15.7%, 10% and Uchida Kroener 4.3%. 95% of patients remained hospilalizada (average of 2 ± 0.5 days). There were significant differences p <0.05 between study groups regarding pelvic pain -2.8% 12.9% experimental group and control-group, as in sex without fear of pregnancy, with 7.0% and 17.1%, respectively. The study cost savings of US $ 102.08 was noted for the experimental technique. CONCLUSION: The technique of ETMSR showed less postoperative pelvic pain, reduced fear of pregnancy on sex and lower cost than the traditional sterilization techniques.OBJETIVO: Determinar las ventajas de la electrocoagulación tubárica monopolar (ETM) como método de esterilización quirúrgica (EQ) permanente. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio de 141 pacientes que acudieron a la consulta de planificación famiíiar de la Clínica Maternidad Santa Ana, Instituto Venezolano de los Seguros Sociales, durante el periodo abril 2003-agosto 2004, en solicitud de que le fuera practicado un método de EQ permanente voluntaria. Fueron agrupadas aleatoriamente en dos grupos, uno experimental de 71 pacientes (50,4%), a quienes se le practicó EQ permanente voluntaria por técnica de ETM con sección remoción (ETMSR) y otro de 70 pacientes (49,6%) a quienes se le practicó EQ permanente voluntaria por las técnicas clásicas. RESULTADOS: La edad promedio fue 32 ±6 años, con 67,4% entre 28 y 39 años. No hubo diferencia significativa en el número de gestas (media de 4±2,3). La técnica de EQ experimental fue utilizada en todas las mujeres del primer grupo y, en el grupo control Pomeroy 41,1%, Madlener 22,9%, Parkland 15,7%, Kroener 10% y Uchida 4,3%. El 95% de las pacientes permaneció hospilalizada (media de 2 ± 0,5 días). Hubo diferencias significativas p<0,05 entre los grupos de estudio respecto al dolor pélvico -2,8% grupo experimental y 12,9% grupo control-, al igual que en las relaciones sexuales sin temor al embarazo, con 7,0% y 17,1%, respectivamente. En el estudio de costo se notó un ahorro de US$ 102,08 a favor de la técnica experimental. CONCLUSIÓN: La técnica de ETMSR mostró menos dolor pélvico postoperatorio, menor temor al embarazo en las relaciones sexuales y menor costo, que las técnicas clásicos de esterilización.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 51 No. 1 (2005); 19-26Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 51 Núm. 1 (2005); 19-262304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391/360info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3912015-08-01T16:49:11Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization
Electrocoagulación tubárica monopolar con sección y remoción como método de esterilización quirúrgica permanente
title Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization
spellingShingle Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization
Algara Urquiola, Luis
title_short Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization
title_full Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization
title_fullStr Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization
title_full_unstemmed Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization
title_sort Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Algara Urquiola, Luis
author Algara Urquiola, Luis
author_facet Algara Urquiola, Luis
author_role author
description OBJETIVE: To determine the advantages of monopolar tubal electrocoagulation (ETM) as a method of surgical sterilization (EQ) permanent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 141 patients who attended the consultation planning famiíiar Maternity Clinic Santa Ana, Venezuelan Institute of Social Security, during the period April 2003 to August 2004, that application was practiced a method of EQ voluntary permanent. They were grouped randomly into two groups, experimental one of 71 patients (50.4%), whom he underwent voluntary permanent EQ by ETM technique with removal section (ETMSR) and one of 70 patients (49.6%) who he underwent voluntary permanent EQ by conventional techniques. RESULTS: The mean age was 32 ± 6 years with 67.4% between 28 and 39 years. There was no significant difference in the number of deeds (average of 4 ± 2.3). EQ experimental technique was used in all women in the first group and in the control group Pomeroy 41.1%, 22.9% Madlener, Parkland 15.7%, 10% and Uchida Kroener 4.3%. 95% of patients remained hospilalizada (average of 2 ± 0.5 days). There were significant differences p <0.05 between study groups regarding pelvic pain -2.8% 12.9% experimental group and control-group, as in sex without fear of pregnancy, with 7.0% and 17.1%, respectively. The study cost savings of US $ 102.08 was noted for the experimental technique. CONCLUSION: The technique of ETMSR showed less postoperative pelvic pain, reduced fear of pregnancy on sex and lower cost than the traditional sterilization techniques.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391
url http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391/360
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 51 No. 1 (2005); 19-26
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 51 Núm. 1 (2005); 19-26
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
reponame_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1850955883214798848
score 12.797654
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).