Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization
Descripción del Articulo
OBJETIVE: To determine the advantages of monopolar tubal electrocoagulation (ETM) as a method of surgical sterilization (EQ) permanent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 141 patients who attended the consultation planning famiíiar Maternity Clinic Santa Ana, Venezuelan Institute of Social Security, during the...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2015 |
| Institución: | Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| Repositorio: | Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/391 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| id |
REVSPOG_c99fc0b01386fa3fc167d50c3f283732 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/391 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVSPOG |
| network_name_str |
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| spelling |
Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilizationElectrocoagulación tubárica monopolar con sección y remoción como método de esterilización quirúrgica permanenteAlgara Urquiola, LuisOBJETIVE: To determine the advantages of monopolar tubal electrocoagulation (ETM) as a method of surgical sterilization (EQ) permanent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 141 patients who attended the consultation planning famiíiar Maternity Clinic Santa Ana, Venezuelan Institute of Social Security, during the period April 2003 to August 2004, that application was practiced a method of EQ voluntary permanent. They were grouped randomly into two groups, experimental one of 71 patients (50.4%), whom he underwent voluntary permanent EQ by ETM technique with removal section (ETMSR) and one of 70 patients (49.6%) who he underwent voluntary permanent EQ by conventional techniques. RESULTS: The mean age was 32 ± 6 years with 67.4% between 28 and 39 years. There was no significant difference in the number of deeds (average of 4 ± 2.3). EQ experimental technique was used in all women in the first group and in the control group Pomeroy 41.1%, 22.9% Madlener, Parkland 15.7%, 10% and Uchida Kroener 4.3%. 95% of patients remained hospilalizada (average of 2 ± 0.5 days). There were significant differences p <0.05 between study groups regarding pelvic pain -2.8% 12.9% experimental group and control-group, as in sex without fear of pregnancy, with 7.0% and 17.1%, respectively. The study cost savings of US $ 102.08 was noted for the experimental technique. CONCLUSION: The technique of ETMSR showed less postoperative pelvic pain, reduced fear of pregnancy on sex and lower cost than the traditional sterilization techniques.OBJETIVO: Determinar las ventajas de la electrocoagulación tubárica monopolar (ETM) como método de esterilización quirúrgica (EQ) permanente. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio de 141 pacientes que acudieron a la consulta de planificación famiíiar de la Clínica Maternidad Santa Ana, Instituto Venezolano de los Seguros Sociales, durante el periodo abril 2003-agosto 2004, en solicitud de que le fuera practicado un método de EQ permanente voluntaria. Fueron agrupadas aleatoriamente en dos grupos, uno experimental de 71 pacientes (50,4%), a quienes se le practicó EQ permanente voluntaria por técnica de ETM con sección remoción (ETMSR) y otro de 70 pacientes (49,6%) a quienes se le practicó EQ permanente voluntaria por las técnicas clásicas. RESULTADOS: La edad promedio fue 32 ±6 años, con 67,4% entre 28 y 39 años. No hubo diferencia significativa en el número de gestas (media de 4±2,3). La técnica de EQ experimental fue utilizada en todas las mujeres del primer grupo y, en el grupo control Pomeroy 41,1%, Madlener 22,9%, Parkland 15,7%, Kroener 10% y Uchida 4,3%. El 95% de las pacientes permaneció hospilalizada (media de 2 ± 0,5 días). Hubo diferencias significativas p<0,05 entre los grupos de estudio respecto al dolor pélvico -2,8% grupo experimental y 12,9% grupo control-, al igual que en las relaciones sexuales sin temor al embarazo, con 7,0% y 17,1%, respectivamente. En el estudio de costo se notó un ahorro de US$ 102,08 a favor de la técnica experimental. CONCLUSIÓN: La técnica de ETMSR mostró menos dolor pélvico postoperatorio, menor temor al embarazo en las relaciones sexuales y menor costo, que las técnicas clásicos de esterilización.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 51 No. 1 (2005); 19-26Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 51 Núm. 1 (2005); 19-262304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391/360info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3912015-08-01T16:49:11Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization Electrocoagulación tubárica monopolar con sección y remoción como método de esterilización quirúrgica permanente |
| title |
Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization |
| spellingShingle |
Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization Algara Urquiola, Luis |
| title_short |
Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization |
| title_full |
Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization |
| title_fullStr |
Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization |
| title_sort |
Tubal monopolar electrocoagulation with section and excision as permanent surgical sterilization |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Algara Urquiola, Luis |
| author |
Algara Urquiola, Luis |
| author_facet |
Algara Urquiola, Luis |
| author_role |
author |
| description |
OBJETIVE: To determine the advantages of monopolar tubal electrocoagulation (ETM) as a method of surgical sterilization (EQ) permanent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 141 patients who attended the consultation planning famiíiar Maternity Clinic Santa Ana, Venezuelan Institute of Social Security, during the period April 2003 to August 2004, that application was practiced a method of EQ voluntary permanent. They were grouped randomly into two groups, experimental one of 71 patients (50.4%), whom he underwent voluntary permanent EQ by ETM technique with removal section (ETMSR) and one of 70 patients (49.6%) who he underwent voluntary permanent EQ by conventional techniques. RESULTS: The mean age was 32 ± 6 years with 67.4% between 28 and 39 years. There was no significant difference in the number of deeds (average of 4 ± 2.3). EQ experimental technique was used in all women in the first group and in the control group Pomeroy 41.1%, 22.9% Madlener, Parkland 15.7%, 10% and Uchida Kroener 4.3%. 95% of patients remained hospilalizada (average of 2 ± 0.5 days). There were significant differences p <0.05 between study groups regarding pelvic pain -2.8% 12.9% experimental group and control-group, as in sex without fear of pregnancy, with 7.0% and 17.1%, respectively. The study cost savings of US $ 102.08 was noted for the experimental technique. CONCLUSION: The technique of ETMSR showed less postoperative pelvic pain, reduced fear of pregnancy on sex and lower cost than the traditional sterilization techniques. |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-05-03 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391 |
| url |
http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/391/360 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 51 No. 1 (2005); 19-26 Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 51 Núm. 1 (2005); 19-26 2304-5132 2304-5124 reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología instacron:SPOG |
| instname_str |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| instacron_str |
SPOG |
| institution |
SPOG |
| reponame_str |
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| collection |
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1850955883214798848 |
| score |
12.797654 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).