Trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section

Descripción del Articulo

Background: The absolute and relative risks associated with the trial of labour in women with previous cesarean section have led to an increase in the rate of caesarean sections, despite the evidence that demonstrates the safety and benefits of trial of labour. Objectives: To determine maternal and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Huertas Tacchino, Erasmo, Pocco Hinostroza, Diana
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/212
Enlace del recurso:http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/212
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVSPOG_6dec99ea3adeb5cbdba38fc92f2b909b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/212
network_acronym_str REVSPOG
network_name_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository_id_str .
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section
PRUEBA DE TRABAJO DE PARTO EN CESAREADA ANTERIOR
title Trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section
spellingShingle Trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section
Huertas Tacchino, Erasmo
title_short Trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section
title_full Trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section
title_fullStr Trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section
title_sort Trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Huertas Tacchino, Erasmo
Pocco Hinostroza, Diana
author Huertas Tacchino, Erasmo
author_facet Huertas Tacchino, Erasmo
Pocco Hinostroza, Diana
author_role author
author2 Pocco Hinostroza, Diana
author2_role author
description Background: The absolute and relative risks associated with the trial of labour in women with previous cesarean section have led to an increase in the rate of caesarean sections, despite the evidence that demonstrates the safety and benefits of trial of labour. Objectives: To determine maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with prior cesarean section to whom trial of labor was indicated. Design: Cohorts, retrospective, analytical study. Setting: Fetal Medicine Unit, Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal, Lima, Peru. Participants: Pregnant women with prior cesarean section and attended at their delivery. Interventions: We reviewed clinical records of 584 women with history of previous cesarean section who delivered at Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal between January and December 2007. We excluded patients who did not meet inclusion criteria and reviewed outcomes of the remaining 266. Main outcome measures: Maternal and perinatal outcomes. Results: From 266 pregnant women with one previous C-section and no contraindications for vaginal delivery 188 (70.7%) had indication of repeat cesarean section and 78 (29.3%) had trial of labor, successful in 51 (65.3%). In the elective cesarean group there was one uterine rupture, one hysterectomy, and two post-partum hemorrhages. In the trial of labour group there were no uterine ruptures, hysterectomies, post-partum hemorrhage. There were no maternal deaths in any group as well as any antepartum or intrapartum intrauterine death, Apgar score below 7 at 5 minutes or neonatal deaths. Conclusions: There was no statistical significant difference in perinatal and maternal outcomes in pregnant women with previous C-section who had trial of labour compared with those who had elective repeated cesarean section. The success rate of trial of labour group was 65.3%.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-19
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/212
url http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/212
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/212/191
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 56 No. 4 (2010); 284-288
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 56 Núm. 4 (2010); 284-288
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
reponame_str Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1845882447864004608
spelling Trial of labor in women with previous cesarean sectionPRUEBA DE TRABAJO DE PARTO EN CESAREADA ANTERIORHuertas Tacchino, ErasmoPocco Hinostroza, DianaBackground: The absolute and relative risks associated with the trial of labour in women with previous cesarean section have led to an increase in the rate of caesarean sections, despite the evidence that demonstrates the safety and benefits of trial of labour. Objectives: To determine maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with prior cesarean section to whom trial of labor was indicated. Design: Cohorts, retrospective, analytical study. Setting: Fetal Medicine Unit, Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal, Lima, Peru. Participants: Pregnant women with prior cesarean section and attended at their delivery. Interventions: We reviewed clinical records of 584 women with history of previous cesarean section who delivered at Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal between January and December 2007. We excluded patients who did not meet inclusion criteria and reviewed outcomes of the remaining 266. Main outcome measures: Maternal and perinatal outcomes. Results: From 266 pregnant women with one previous C-section and no contraindications for vaginal delivery 188 (70.7%) had indication of repeat cesarean section and 78 (29.3%) had trial of labor, successful in 51 (65.3%). In the elective cesarean group there was one uterine rupture, one hysterectomy, and two post-partum hemorrhages. In the trial of labour group there were no uterine ruptures, hysterectomies, post-partum hemorrhage. There were no maternal deaths in any group as well as any antepartum or intrapartum intrauterine death, Apgar score below 7 at 5 minutes or neonatal deaths. Conclusions: There was no statistical significant difference in perinatal and maternal outcomes in pregnant women with previous C-section who had trial of labour compared with those who had elective repeated cesarean section. The success rate of trial of labour group was 65.3%.Antecedentes: Los riesgos relativos y absolutos asociados a la prueba de trabajo de parto en cesareadas anteriores han originado un aumento en la tasa de cesáreas, a pesar de las evidencias que demuestran la seguridad y los beneficios de la prueba de trabajo de parto. Objetivos: Determinar los resultados materno-perinatales de las gestantes con antecedente de una cesárea previa, a quienes se les indicó prueba de trabajo de parto. Diseño: Estudio de cohortes, retrospectivo, analítico. Institución: Unidad de Medicina Fetal, Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal, Lima, Perú. Participantes: Gestantes con antecedente de una cesárea previa y atendidas en el parto. Intervenciones: Se revisó 584 historias clínicas de mujeres con antecedente de una cesárea previa que dieron a luz entre enero y diciembre de 2007. Se excluyó las pacientes que no cumplían los criterios de inclusión y se obtuvo los resultados materno perinatales de las 266 gestantes restantes. Principales medidas de resultados: Resultados materno-perinatales. Resultados: De 266 gestantes con antecedente de una cesárea previa y sin contraindicación para el parto vaginal, a 188 (70,7%) se les indicó cesárea electiva repetida y a 78 (29,3%), prueba de trabajo de parto. De estas últimas, 51 (65,3%) tuvieron éxito. Los resultados maternos muestran en el grupo de cesárea electiva una rotura uterina, una histerectomía y dos casos de hemorragia posparto. En el grupo prueba de trabajo de parto, no hubo rotura uterina, histerectomía, hemorragia posparto. No hubo muertes maternas en algún grupo. En cuanto a los resultados perinatales, no hubo caso de muerte intraútero anteparto o intraparto, Ápgar menor de 7 a los 5 minutos, ni muertes neonatales, en ninguno de los dos grupos. Conclusiones: No hubo diferencia  estadísticamente significativa en los resultados materno-perinatales de las gestantes con antecedente de una cesárea previa a quienes se indicó prueba de trabajo de parto, comparados con quienes se indicó cesárea selectiva repetida. La tasa de éxito del grupo prueba de trabajo de parto fue 65,3%.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/212The Peruvian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics ; Vol. 56 No. 4 (2010); 284-288Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 56 Núm. 4 (2010); 284-2882304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://51.222.106.123/index.php/RPGO/article/view/212/191info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2122015-08-04T23:29:32Z
score 13.384119
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).