Guide wire-assisted cannulation versus conventional contrast to prevent pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: Through this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to clarify the differences between these two techniques, thus improving primary success cannulation and reducing complications during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, primarily pancreatitis. Methods: A comprehensive s...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2017 |
| Institución: | Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/55 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://www.revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/55 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Catheterization Cholangiopancreatography endoscopic retrograde Pancreatitis Meta-analysis |
| id |
REVSGP_14dad6e89bb989d403025d2ae47aed0b |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/55 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVSGP |
| network_name_str |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| spelling |
Guide wire-assisted cannulation versus conventional contrast to prevent pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trialsDe Moura, Eduardo T.H.De Moura, Eduardo G.H.Bernardo, WanderleyCheng, SpencerKondo, AndreDe Moura, Diogo T.H.Bravo, JoseArtifon, Everson L.A.CatheterizationCholangiopancreatographyendoscopic retrogradePancreatitisMeta-analysisObjective: Through this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to clarify the differences between these two techniques, thus improving primary success cannulation and reducing complications during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, primarily pancreatitis. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted to search for data available up until June2015from the most important databases available in the health field: EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane, LILACS and CENTRAL (via BVS), SCOPUS, the CAPES database (Brazil), and gray literature. Results: Nine randomized clinical trialsincluding2583 people were selected from20,198 studies for meta-analysis. Choledocholithiasis had been diagnosed in mostly (63.8%) of the patients, who were aged an average of 63.15 years. In those patients treated using the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique, provided a significantly lower instance of pancreatitis (RD=0.03; 95% CI: 0.01-0.05; I2= 45%) and greater primary success cannulation (RD=0.07; 95% CI: 0.03-0.12; I2=12%) than conventional contrast cannulation. Conclusions: The guide wire-assisted technique, when compared to the conventional contrast technique, reduces the risk of pancreatitis and increases primary success cannulation rate. Thus, guide wire-assisted cannulation appears to be the most appropriate first-line cannulation technique.Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú2017-01-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/5510.47892/rgp.2016.364.55Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; 2016 Vol 36 (4); 308-191609-722X1022-5129reponame:Revista de Gastroenterología del Perúinstname:Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perúinstacron:SOCIOGASTROspahttp://www.revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/55/53Derechos de autor 2017 Revista de Gastroenterología del Perúinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.revistagastroperu.com:article/552017-01-09T19:20:59Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Guide wire-assisted cannulation versus conventional contrast to prevent pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials |
| title |
Guide wire-assisted cannulation versus conventional contrast to prevent pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials |
| spellingShingle |
Guide wire-assisted cannulation versus conventional contrast to prevent pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials De Moura, Eduardo T.H. Catheterization Cholangiopancreatography endoscopic retrograde Pancreatitis Meta-analysis |
| title_short |
Guide wire-assisted cannulation versus conventional contrast to prevent pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials |
| title_full |
Guide wire-assisted cannulation versus conventional contrast to prevent pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials |
| title_fullStr |
Guide wire-assisted cannulation versus conventional contrast to prevent pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Guide wire-assisted cannulation versus conventional contrast to prevent pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials |
| title_sort |
Guide wire-assisted cannulation versus conventional contrast to prevent pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
De Moura, Eduardo T.H. De Moura, Eduardo G.H. Bernardo, Wanderley Cheng, Spencer Kondo, Andre De Moura, Diogo T.H. Bravo, Jose Artifon, Everson L.A. |
| author |
De Moura, Eduardo T.H. |
| author_facet |
De Moura, Eduardo T.H. De Moura, Eduardo G.H. Bernardo, Wanderley Cheng, Spencer Kondo, Andre De Moura, Diogo T.H. Bravo, Jose Artifon, Everson L.A. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
De Moura, Eduardo G.H. Bernardo, Wanderley Cheng, Spencer Kondo, Andre De Moura, Diogo T.H. Bravo, Jose Artifon, Everson L.A. |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Catheterization Cholangiopancreatography endoscopic retrograde Pancreatitis Meta-analysis |
| topic |
Catheterization Cholangiopancreatography endoscopic retrograde Pancreatitis Meta-analysis |
| description |
Objective: Through this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to clarify the differences between these two techniques, thus improving primary success cannulation and reducing complications during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, primarily pancreatitis. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted to search for data available up until June2015from the most important databases available in the health field: EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane, LILACS and CENTRAL (via BVS), SCOPUS, the CAPES database (Brazil), and gray literature. Results: Nine randomized clinical trialsincluding2583 people were selected from20,198 studies for meta-analysis. Choledocholithiasis had been diagnosed in mostly (63.8%) of the patients, who were aged an average of 63.15 years. In those patients treated using the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique, provided a significantly lower instance of pancreatitis (RD=0.03; 95% CI: 0.01-0.05; I2= 45%) and greater primary success cannulation (RD=0.07; 95% CI: 0.03-0.12; I2=12%) than conventional contrast cannulation. Conclusions: The guide wire-assisted technique, when compared to the conventional contrast technique, reduces the risk of pancreatitis and increases primary success cannulation rate. Thus, guide wire-assisted cannulation appears to be the most appropriate first-line cannulation technique. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-09 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/55 10.47892/rgp.2016.364.55 |
| url |
http://www.revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/55 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.47892/rgp.2016.364.55 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/55/53 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2017 Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2017 Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú; 2016 Vol 36 (4); 308-19 1609-722X 1022-5129 reponame:Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú instname:Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú instacron:SOCIOGASTRO |
| instname_str |
Sociedad de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| instacron_str |
SOCIOGASTRO |
| institution |
SOCIOGASTRO |
| reponame_str |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| collection |
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1846699726340096000 |
| score |
12.80667 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).