Game Theory and the Law: The “Legal-Rules-Acceptability Theorem” {A Rational for Non-Compliance with Legal Rules)

Descripción del Articulo

Until now, legal science has lacked of a formal explanation forthe biggestand mostobvious legal problem: "non-compliance with legal rules': This papel defies the common sense idea that non-compliance with legal rules is a psychological issue by providing the first formal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Flores Borda, Guillermo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2011
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13236
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/13236
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id REVPUCP_fd2f9d3a31f2b51e7d6903c3ed775e37
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13236
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Game Theory and the Law: The “Legal-Rules-Acceptability Theorem” {A Rational for Non-Compliance with Legal Rules)Flores Borda, GuillermoUntil now, legal science has lacked of a formal explanation forthe biggestand mostobvious legal problem: "non-compliance with legal rules': This papel defies the common sense idea that non-compliance with legal rules is a psychological issue by providing the first formal game-theoretic explanation regarding how people decide wthether to comply with a specific legalrule, and provides a solution that any policy maker can apply in arder to reduce legal non-compliance rates.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2011-07-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/13236Derecho & Sociedad; No. 36 (2011); 301-314Derecho & Sociedad; Núm. 36 (2011); 301-3142521-599X2079-3634reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/13236/13847Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho & Sociedadinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/132362024-09-30T15:15:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Game Theory and the Law: The “Legal-Rules-Acceptability Theorem” {A Rational for Non-Compliance with Legal Rules)
title Game Theory and the Law: The “Legal-Rules-Acceptability Theorem” {A Rational for Non-Compliance with Legal Rules)
spellingShingle Game Theory and the Law: The “Legal-Rules-Acceptability Theorem” {A Rational for Non-Compliance with Legal Rules)
Flores Borda, Guillermo
title_short Game Theory and the Law: The “Legal-Rules-Acceptability Theorem” {A Rational for Non-Compliance with Legal Rules)
title_full Game Theory and the Law: The “Legal-Rules-Acceptability Theorem” {A Rational for Non-Compliance with Legal Rules)
title_fullStr Game Theory and the Law: The “Legal-Rules-Acceptability Theorem” {A Rational for Non-Compliance with Legal Rules)
title_full_unstemmed Game Theory and the Law: The “Legal-Rules-Acceptability Theorem” {A Rational for Non-Compliance with Legal Rules)
title_sort Game Theory and the Law: The “Legal-Rules-Acceptability Theorem” {A Rational for Non-Compliance with Legal Rules)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Flores Borda, Guillermo
author Flores Borda, Guillermo
author_facet Flores Borda, Guillermo
author_role author
description Until now, legal science has lacked of a formal explanation forthe biggestand mostobvious legal problem: "non-compliance with legal rules': This papel defies the common sense idea that non-compliance with legal rules is a psychological issue by providing the first formal game-theoretic explanation regarding how people decide wthether to comply with a specific legalrule, and provides a solution that any policy maker can apply in arder to reduce legal non-compliance rates.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-07-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/13236
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/13236
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/13236/13847
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho & Sociedad
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho & Sociedad
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Derecho & Sociedad; No. 36 (2011); 301-314
Derecho & Sociedad; Núm. 36 (2011); 301-314
2521-599X
2079-3634
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846609430312910848
score 12.857936
Game Theory and the Law: The “Legal-Rules-Acceptability Theorem” {A Rational for Non-Compliance with Legal Rules)
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares