Public laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher Education
Descripción del Articulo
The purpose of this essay is to analyze legal proposals and public policies related to the entry and permanence of students with special educational needs in higher education, within a Latin American context that includes Mexico and Brazil. To conduct a comparative study, we use a historical-documen...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2023 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | portugués |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26867 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/26867 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Special education Higher education Legislation Public policy Comparative study Educación especial Educación superior Legislación Políticas públicas Estudio comparativo Educação especial Educação superior Legislação Estudo comparado |
id |
REVPUCP_fa56d632f3b6518d15887ed3a9d719f1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26867 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Public laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher Education Leyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación Superior Legislações e políticas públicas: um estudo comparado internacional em Educação Especial na Educação Superior |
title |
Public laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher Education |
spellingShingle |
Public laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher Education Hora, Júnio Special education Higher education Legislation Public policy Comparative study Educación especial Educación superior Legislación Políticas públicas Estudio comparativo Educação especial Educação superior Legislação Políticas públicas Estudo comparado |
title_short |
Public laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher Education |
title_full |
Public laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher Education |
title_fullStr |
Public laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher Education |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher Education |
title_sort |
Public laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher Education |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Hora, Júnio Bazilatto, Alexandre Pantaleão, Edson |
author |
Hora, Júnio |
author_facet |
Hora, Júnio Bazilatto, Alexandre Pantaleão, Edson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bazilatto, Alexandre Pantaleão, Edson |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Special education Higher education Legislation Public policy Comparative study Educación especial Educación superior Legislación Políticas públicas Estudio comparativo Educação especial Educação superior Legislação Políticas públicas Estudo comparado |
topic |
Special education Higher education Legislation Public policy Comparative study Educación especial Educación superior Legislación Políticas públicas Estudio comparativo Educação especial Educação superior Legislação Políticas públicas Estudo comparado |
description |
The purpose of this essay is to analyze legal proposals and public policies related to the entry and permanence of students with special educational needs in higher education, within a Latin American context that includes Mexico and Brazil. To conduct a comparative study, we use a historical-documentary methodology that examines educational legislation and its impact on public policies between 1996 and 2018. Our theoretical perspective is based on the concept of Civilizing Processes, as developed by Norbert Elias (1993; 1998; 2001; 2006; 2011). This perspective emphasizes how societies utilize social relations between different groups to form their constitution and interdependence processes, which in turn impact the actions of individuals as well as the state institutions that govern them. The data we present in this essay show that Mexico and Brazil have established legal frameworks that recognize the rights of students with special educational needs to access higher education. However, we also question the extent to which these legal documents are effectively implemented and how their failure to materialize can negatively impact our civilizing process, hindering progress towards a society that truly respects diversity and inclusivity. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-18 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/26867 |
url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/26867 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/26867/25130 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Educacion; Vol. 32 No. 62 (2023); 144-160 Educación; Vol. 32 Núm. 62 (2023); 144-160 Educacion; v. 32 n. 62 (2023); 144-160 2304-4322 1019-9403 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
instacron_str |
PUCP |
institution |
PUCP |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1844706500065361920 |
spelling |
Public laws and policies: an international compared study on Special Education in Higher EducationLeyes y políticas públicas: un estudio internacional comparado sobre Educación Especial en Educación SuperiorLegislações e políticas públicas: um estudo comparado internacional em Educação Especial na Educação SuperiorHora, JúnioBazilatto, AlexandrePantaleão, EdsonSpecial educationHigher educationLegislationPublic policyComparative studyEducación especialEducación superiorLegislaciónPolíticas públicasEstudio comparativoEducação especialEducação superiorLegislaçãoPolíticas públicasEstudo comparadoThe purpose of this essay is to analyze legal proposals and public policies related to the entry and permanence of students with special educational needs in higher education, within a Latin American context that includes Mexico and Brazil. To conduct a comparative study, we use a historical-documentary methodology that examines educational legislation and its impact on public policies between 1996 and 2018. Our theoretical perspective is based on the concept of Civilizing Processes, as developed by Norbert Elias (1993; 1998; 2001; 2006; 2011). This perspective emphasizes how societies utilize social relations between different groups to form their constitution and interdependence processes, which in turn impact the actions of individuals as well as the state institutions that govern them. The data we present in this essay show that Mexico and Brazil have established legal frameworks that recognize the rights of students with special educational needs to access higher education. However, we also question the extent to which these legal documents are effectively implemented and how their failure to materialize can negatively impact our civilizing process, hindering progress towards a society that truly respects diversity and inclusivity.El propósito de este ensayo es analizar las propuestas legales y sus políticas públicas para el ingreso y estadía de estudiantes con discapacidad en Educación Superior, en un contexto latinoamericano entre México y Brasil. Para un estudio comparativo nos basamos en la metodología histórico-documental sobre la legislación educativa que marcó las políticas públicas entre 1996 y 2018. La perspectiva teórica se basa en la idea de procesos civilizadores, desarrollada por Norbert Elias (1993; 1998; 2001; 2006; 2011), destacando que las sociedades utilizan para su constitución un conjunto de relaciones entre individuos y grupos sociales, cuyos procesos de interdependencia configuran las figuraciones humanas y sus acciones en paralelo a los Estados en los que estas figuras la componen. Los datos demuestran que México y Brasil están en condiciones de contemplar legalmente el acceso de las personas con discapacidad en la Educación Superior. Lo que hemos cuestionado es sobre la aplicabilidad de estos documentos legales y la medida en que su falta de materialización impacta nuestro proceso civilizador y la mejora de la condición humana que respeta las diferencias.O ensaio analisa legislações e políticas públicas para estudantes público-alvo da Educação Especial na Educação Superior, em contexto latino-americano entre México e Brasil. Para um estudo comparado, baseamo-nos na metodologia histórico-documental trabalhando legislações educacionais entre 1996 e 2018. A perspectiva teórica dos Processos Civilizadores, por Norbert Elias (1993; 1998; 2001; 2006; 2011), destacando um conjunto das relações entre indivíduos e grupos sociais para sua constituição, cujos processos de interdependência formam as figurações humanas e suas ações em paralelo aos Estados em que essas figurações compõem. Os dados demonstram que México e o Brasil contemplam legalmente o acesso de estudantes público-alvo da Educação Especial à Educação Superior. Questionamos sobre a aplicabilidade desses documentos e em que medida a não concretização impacta no Processo Civilizador e aprimoramento do respeito às diferenças.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2023-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/26867Educacion; Vol. 32 No. 62 (2023); 144-160Educación; Vol. 32 Núm. 62 (2023); 144-160Educacion; v. 32 n. 62 (2023); 144-1602304-43221019-9403reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPporhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/26867/25130info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/268672024-07-18T18:03:47Z |
score |
13.4165325 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).