The Fourth Plenary Session on Civil Matters vs. Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions: Disagreements, Contradictions, and Uncertainty. We need a new casatory plenary session on precarious possession

Descripción del Articulo

The Fourth Casatory Plenary has encountered significant challenges due to the evolving circumstances. Throughout the past decade, a series of Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions have emerged, some of which have addressed issues that were not examined during the Fourth Plenary (such as the jurisdiction o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Pasco Arauco, Alan Augusto
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27270
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Posesión Precaria
Cuarto Pleno
Pleno Jurisdiccional
Precedente Vinculante
Título Posesorio
Arrendamiento
Desalojo
Precarious Possession
Fourth Plenary Session
Plenary Jurisdictional
Binding precedent
Possessory Title
Leasing
Eviction
id REVPUCP_f068a37df07fdc42cc2f1c2d41df6ad7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27270
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Fourth Plenary Session on Civil Matters vs. Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions: Disagreements, Contradictions, and Uncertainty. We need a new casatory plenary session on precarious possession
El Cuarto Pleno Casatorio Civil vs. los Plenos Jurisdiccionales: desencuentros, contradicciones e incertidumbre. Necesitamos un nuevo pleno casatorio sobre la posesión precaria
title The Fourth Plenary Session on Civil Matters vs. Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions: Disagreements, Contradictions, and Uncertainty. We need a new casatory plenary session on precarious possession
spellingShingle The Fourth Plenary Session on Civil Matters vs. Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions: Disagreements, Contradictions, and Uncertainty. We need a new casatory plenary session on precarious possession
Pasco Arauco, Alan Augusto
Posesión Precaria
Cuarto Pleno
Pleno Jurisdiccional
Precedente Vinculante
Título Posesorio
Arrendamiento
Desalojo
Precarious Possession
Fourth Plenary Session
Plenary Jurisdictional
Binding precedent
Possessory Title
Leasing
Eviction
title_short The Fourth Plenary Session on Civil Matters vs. Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions: Disagreements, Contradictions, and Uncertainty. We need a new casatory plenary session on precarious possession
title_full The Fourth Plenary Session on Civil Matters vs. Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions: Disagreements, Contradictions, and Uncertainty. We need a new casatory plenary session on precarious possession
title_fullStr The Fourth Plenary Session on Civil Matters vs. Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions: Disagreements, Contradictions, and Uncertainty. We need a new casatory plenary session on precarious possession
title_full_unstemmed The Fourth Plenary Session on Civil Matters vs. Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions: Disagreements, Contradictions, and Uncertainty. We need a new casatory plenary session on precarious possession
title_sort The Fourth Plenary Session on Civil Matters vs. Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions: Disagreements, Contradictions, and Uncertainty. We need a new casatory plenary session on precarious possession
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pasco Arauco, Alan Augusto
author Pasco Arauco, Alan Augusto
author_facet Pasco Arauco, Alan Augusto
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Posesión Precaria
Cuarto Pleno
Pleno Jurisdiccional
Precedente Vinculante
Título Posesorio
Arrendamiento
Desalojo
Precarious Possession
Fourth Plenary Session
Plenary Jurisdictional
Binding precedent
Possessory Title
Leasing
Eviction
topic Posesión Precaria
Cuarto Pleno
Pleno Jurisdiccional
Precedente Vinculante
Título Posesorio
Arrendamiento
Desalojo
Precarious Possession
Fourth Plenary Session
Plenary Jurisdictional
Binding precedent
Possessory Title
Leasing
Eviction
description The Fourth Casatory Plenary has encountered significant challenges due to the evolving circumstances. Throughout the past decade, a series of Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions have emerged, some of which have addressed issues that were not examined during the Fourth Plenary (such as the jurisdiction of Magistrate Judges to adjudicate precarious eviction cases or the potential waiver of conciliation in evictions arising from lease agreements with forfeiture clauses). Moreover, certain conclusions reached in these sessions openly contradict the precedents established in the Fourth Plenary (including the prescriptive period applicable to eviction claims or the possessory title in eviction lawsuits filed against family members).The current situation bears resemblance to the environment in which the Fourth Plenary was conducted, characterized by: (i) divergent perspectives on various aspects concerning precarious possession, (ii) a lack of certainty regarding the resolution of everyday challenges, (iii) inconsistent verdicts on identical matters and (iv) a pervasive atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability to the detriment of the litigants.An imperative exists for a new casatory plenary session focused on precarious possession that, akin to the Fourth Plenary in 2013, enables the restoration of order and furnishes a measure of predictability and certainty, at least in the medium term.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270/25509
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270/25526
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270/25542
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270/25567
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/epub+zip
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv IUS ET VERITAS; No. 66 (2023): Derecho de la Construcción; 194-214
IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 66 (2023): Derecho de la Construcción; 194-214
IUS ET VERITAS; No. 66 (2023): Derecho de la Construcción; 194-214
IUS ET VERITAS; N. 66 (2023): Derecho de la Construcción; 194-214
IUS ET VERITAS; n. 66 (2023): Derecho de la Construcción; 194-214
1995-2929
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1841535918162313216
spelling The Fourth Plenary Session on Civil Matters vs. Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions: Disagreements, Contradictions, and Uncertainty. We need a new casatory plenary session on precarious possessionEl Cuarto Pleno Casatorio Civil vs. los Plenos Jurisdiccionales: desencuentros, contradicciones e incertidumbre. Necesitamos un nuevo pleno casatorio sobre la posesión precariaPasco Arauco, Alan AugustoPosesión PrecariaCuarto PlenoPleno JurisdiccionalPrecedente VinculanteTítulo PosesorioArrendamientoDesalojoPrecarious PossessionFourth Plenary SessionPlenary JurisdictionalBinding precedentPossessory TitleLeasingEvictionThe Fourth Casatory Plenary has encountered significant challenges due to the evolving circumstances. Throughout the past decade, a series of Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions have emerged, some of which have addressed issues that were not examined during the Fourth Plenary (such as the jurisdiction of Magistrate Judges to adjudicate precarious eviction cases or the potential waiver of conciliation in evictions arising from lease agreements with forfeiture clauses). Moreover, certain conclusions reached in these sessions openly contradict the precedents established in the Fourth Plenary (including the prescriptive period applicable to eviction claims or the possessory title in eviction lawsuits filed against family members).The current situation bears resemblance to the environment in which the Fourth Plenary was conducted, characterized by: (i) divergent perspectives on various aspects concerning precarious possession, (ii) a lack of certainty regarding the resolution of everyday challenges, (iii) inconsistent verdicts on identical matters and (iv) a pervasive atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability to the detriment of the litigants.An imperative exists for a new casatory plenary session focused on precarious possession that, akin to the Fourth Plenary in 2013, enables the restoration of order and furnishes a measure of predictability and certainty, at least in the medium term.El IV Pleno Casatorio ha sido desbordado por la realidad. A lo largo de los últimos diez años, se han venido dando una serie de Plenos Jurisdiccionales que, en algunos casos, han abordado temas que no fueron analizados en el IV Pleno (la competencia de los Jueces de Paz Letrado para conocer desalojos por precario o la posibilidad de prescindir de la conciliación en los desalojos derivados de contratos de arrendamiento con cláusula de allanamiento) y, en otros, han arribado a conclusiones que contradicen abiertamente los precedentes adoptados en el IV Pleno (el plazo prescriptorio aplicable a la pretensión de desalojo, o el título posesorio en las demandas de desalojo interpuestas contra familiares).La situación en la que nos encontramos es similar al contexto en el que se realizó el IV Pleno: (i) variedad de criterios sobre diversos temas referidos a la posesión precaria, (ii) falta de certeza respecto de cómo resolver problemas cotidianos, (iii) fallos contradictorios sobre temas idénticos y (iv) absoluta incerteza y ausencia de predictibilidad en perjuicio del justiciable.A partir de esto, es necesario un nuevo pleno casatorio sobre la posesión precaria que, tal como lo hizo el IV Pleno en el año 2013, nos permita ordenar la casa y nos proporcione (al menos en el mediano plazo) algo de predictibilidad y certeza.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2023-08-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/epub+zipapplication/xmlhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270IUS ET VERITAS; No. 66 (2023): Derecho de la Construcción; 194-214IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 66 (2023): Derecho de la Construcción; 194-214IUS ET VERITAS; No. 66 (2023): Derecho de la Construcción; 194-214IUS ET VERITAS; N. 66 (2023): Derecho de la Construcción; 194-214IUS ET VERITAS; n. 66 (2023): Derecho de la Construcción; 194-2141995-2929reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270/25509http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270/25526http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270/25542http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/27270/25567info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/272702024-02-01T15:31:46Z
score 13.959468
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).