The principle of judicial non interference in arbitrations: Comments on Article 3 of the Peruvian Arbitration Law

• Autores: Velásquez Meléndez, Raffo, Chang Tokushima, Juan
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2021
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:revistaspuc:article/23905
• Enlace del recurso: http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23905
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Arbitraje; Laudos; Amparo; Anulación de laudos; Terceros; Poder Judicial; Jurisprudencia constitucional; Jurisprudencia comparada; Perú; Arbitration; Awards; Annulment of awards; Third parties; Judicial Power; Constitutional jurisprudence; Comparative jurisprudence; Peru

The virtues of arbitration depend on the principle of judicial non-interference in its proceedings and on a limited regime of subsequent judicial control of arbitrations. However, there is a lot of confusion about the articulation of the different procedural control channels applicable to arbitrations, the timing of their activation and their scope. Article 3 of the Arbitration Act establishes the principle of judicial non-interference, but it needs to be understood within the entire framework of existing procedural defenses. For these purposes, the history of national and comparative jurisprudence plays an extremely relevant role.