The importance of the concept of permission in the normative systems and the framework of constitutional states

Descripción del Articulo

This research analyzes the importance of the concept of permission in normative systems based on the idea that it does not only mean absence of prohibition, and that the notions of prohibition / obligation are not enough to explain these systems. In this sense, taking as main referent the classical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Ku Yanasupo, Lily
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/22720
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22720
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Teoría Constitucional
Teoría del Derecho
Teoría de las normas
Imperativismo
Sistemas normativos
Permisión
Normas permisivas
Constitutional Theory
Law theory
Rules theory
Imperativism
Normative systems
Permission
Permissive rules
id REVPUCP_e9dad866717f86595208439fd5ea3024
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/22720
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling The importance of the concept of permission in the normative systems and the framework of constitutional statesLa importancia del concepto de permisión en los sistemas normativos y en el marco de los estados constitucionalesKu Yanasupo, LilyTeoría ConstitucionalTeoría del DerechoTeoría de las normasImperativismoSistemas normativosPermisiónNormas permisivasConstitutional TheoryLaw theoryRules theoryImperativismNormative systemsPermissionPermissive rulesThis research analyzes the importance of the concept of permission in normative systems based on the idea that it does not only mean absence of prohibition, and that the notions of prohibition / obligation are not enough to explain these systems. In this sense, taking as main referent the classical theory of Carlos E. Alchourron and Eugenio Bulygin on the meanings of the deontic term “permitted” according to its prescriptive and descriptive use, as well as the distinction between the field of the normative systems and the field of legal reasoning, the author suggests that although a “non-prohibited conduct” can be interpreted as an “permitted conduct”, this interpretation is not sufficient to consider that such conduct is regulated and available to the subject. Regarding the practical analysis of permissive rules, mainly in the framework of constitutional states, the author explains the utility of these to close the legal systems, generate the obligation to facilitate or the prohibition of not interfering in the action referred in the permit, and delimit the normative powers when there are hierarchically ordered authorities.La presente investigación analiza la importancia del concepto de permisión en los sistemas normativos a partir de la idea de que este no solo significa ausencia de prohibición, y que no basta con las nociones de prohibición/obligación para explicar dichos sistemas. En ese sentido, tomando como principal referente la teoría clásica de Carlos E. Alchourron y Eugenio Bulygin sobre los significados del término deóntico “permitido” según su uso prescriptivo y descriptivo, así como la distinción entre el ámbito de los sistemas normativos y el ámbito del razonamiento jurídico, la autora plantea que si bien una “conducta no prohibida” puede interpretarse como una “conducta permitida”, esta interpretación no es suficiente para considerar que dicha conducta se encuentra regulada y disponible para el sujeto. En cuanto al análisis práctico de las normas permisivas, principalmente en el marco de los estados constitucionales, la autora explica la utilidad de estas para clausurar los sistemas jurídicos, generar la obligación de facilitar (o la prohibición de no interferir en) la acción referida en el permiso, y delimitar las competencias normativas cuando existen autoridades jerárquicamente ordenadas.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2020-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/epub+ziphttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/2272010.18800/iusetveritas.202001.008IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 60 (2020); 160-1871995-2929reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22720/21848http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22720/21973http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/227202020-09-18T01:18:08Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The importance of the concept of permission in the normative systems and the framework of constitutional states
La importancia del concepto de permisión en los sistemas normativos y en el marco de los estados constitucionales
title The importance of the concept of permission in the normative systems and the framework of constitutional states
spellingShingle The importance of the concept of permission in the normative systems and the framework of constitutional states
Ku Yanasupo, Lily
Teoría Constitucional
Teoría del Derecho
Teoría de las normas
Imperativismo
Sistemas normativos
Permisión
Normas permisivas
Constitutional Theory
Law theory
Rules theory
Imperativism
Normative systems
Permission
Permissive rules
title_short The importance of the concept of permission in the normative systems and the framework of constitutional states
title_full The importance of the concept of permission in the normative systems and the framework of constitutional states
title_fullStr The importance of the concept of permission in the normative systems and the framework of constitutional states
title_full_unstemmed The importance of the concept of permission in the normative systems and the framework of constitutional states
title_sort The importance of the concept of permission in the normative systems and the framework of constitutional states
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ku Yanasupo, Lily
author Ku Yanasupo, Lily
author_facet Ku Yanasupo, Lily
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Teoría Constitucional
Teoría del Derecho
Teoría de las normas
Imperativismo
Sistemas normativos
Permisión
Normas permisivas
Constitutional Theory
Law theory
Rules theory
Imperativism
Normative systems
Permission
Permissive rules
topic Teoría Constitucional
Teoría del Derecho
Teoría de las normas
Imperativismo
Sistemas normativos
Permisión
Normas permisivas
Constitutional Theory
Law theory
Rules theory
Imperativism
Normative systems
Permission
Permissive rules
description This research analyzes the importance of the concept of permission in normative systems based on the idea that it does not only mean absence of prohibition, and that the notions of prohibition / obligation are not enough to explain these systems. In this sense, taking as main referent the classical theory of Carlos E. Alchourron and Eugenio Bulygin on the meanings of the deontic term “permitted” according to its prescriptive and descriptive use, as well as the distinction between the field of the normative systems and the field of legal reasoning, the author suggests that although a “non-prohibited conduct” can be interpreted as an “permitted conduct”, this interpretation is not sufficient to consider that such conduct is regulated and available to the subject. Regarding the practical analysis of permissive rules, mainly in the framework of constitutional states, the author explains the utility of these to close the legal systems, generate the obligation to facilitate or the prohibition of not interfering in the action referred in the permit, and delimit the normative powers when there are hierarchically ordered authorities.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22720
10.18800/iusetveritas.202001.008
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22720
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/iusetveritas.202001.008
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22720/21848
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22720/21973
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 60 (2020); 160-187
1995-2929
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1840900312901091328
score 13.425424
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).