Prison for antitrust offenders? Reflections on the criminalization of anti-competitive practices in Peru

• Autores: Floríndez Aramburú, Francisco José, Velarde Ferreyros, Sebastián, Zúñiga Alemán, Laura
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2020
• Institución: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Repositorio: Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24173
• Enlace del recurso: http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/24173
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Act No. 31040; abuse of economic power; anti-competitive practices; free competition; criminal sanction; Ley 31040; abuso de poder económico; prácticas anticompetitivas; libre competencia; sanción penal

On August 29, 2020, in an attempt to address some of the public's claims in the context of the health crisis, the Congress of the Republic of Peru approved Law 31040, a Law amending the Criminal Code and the Consumer Protection Code, with regard to hoarding, speculation and adulteration, which aims to criminalize the execution of anticompetitive practices. Thus, these practices, until before the enactment, merited only administrative sanctions imposed by Indecopi's Committee on the Defense of Free Competition.In this paper, the authors present some reflections on the compatibility of that Act with the Peruvian legal system. In this way, they substantiate why it constitutes an obstacle to the suppression of anticompetitive practices and increases the level of legal uncertainty for potential offenders.