Do preferential trade agreements favor the liberalization of trade with non-members? The case of the Andean Community

Descripción del Articulo

The theoretical literature has not reached a consensus on the effect of PTAs on multilateral liberalization. Empirical studies on this topic have been limited and, like theoretical studies, their results vary. The objective of this study is to find the effect of the Andean Community of Nations on th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Castillo Thorne, Lakshmi Isabel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/22904
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/22904
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Peru
Andean Community
Preferential Trade Agreements (PTA)
id REVPUCP_d482ab3d9894548d544bc2068e950904
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/22904
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Do preferential trade agreements favor the liberalization of trade with non-members? The case of the Andean CommunityCastillo Thorne, Lakshmi IsabelPeruAndean CommunityPreferential Trade Agreements (PTA)The theoretical literature has not reached a consensus on the effect of PTAs on multilateral liberalization. Empirical studies on this topic have been limited and, like theoretical studies, their results vary. The objective of this study is to find the effect of the Andean Community of Nations on the multilateral liberalization of Peru, by analyzing the variations in the Most Favored Nation (MFN) tariffs applied to non-members as a consequence of the preferential tariff reductions applied by Peru to the members of this PTA. The units of analysis are the tariff lines disaggregated to 6 digits of the Harmonized System for the period 1992-2010. Results show that, for the entire study period, the Andean Community generated a building block. We divided the sample into two sub-periods: 1992-2001 and 2002-2010. For the first period the results show a building block effect; however, for the second half the results changed, and a stumbling block is found. Other variables are also added to observe their effects on changes in external tariffs, such as preferential imports, which, when they present a sizeable preferential margin, cause a reduction in MFN tariffs for the entire sample. Based on these results, we found that the Andean Community did not represent an impediment to multilateral liberalization in Peru. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2021-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/2290410.18800/economia.202102.002Economía; Volume 44 Issue 88 (2021); 23-442304-43060254-4415reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPenghttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/22904/23401Derechos de autor 2021 Lakshmi Isabel Castillo Thornehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/229042021-12-31T19:41:10Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do preferential trade agreements favor the liberalization of trade with non-members? The case of the Andean Community
title Do preferential trade agreements favor the liberalization of trade with non-members? The case of the Andean Community
spellingShingle Do preferential trade agreements favor the liberalization of trade with non-members? The case of the Andean Community
Castillo Thorne, Lakshmi Isabel
Peru
Andean Community
Preferential Trade Agreements (PTA)
title_short Do preferential trade agreements favor the liberalization of trade with non-members? The case of the Andean Community
title_full Do preferential trade agreements favor the liberalization of trade with non-members? The case of the Andean Community
title_fullStr Do preferential trade agreements favor the liberalization of trade with non-members? The case of the Andean Community
title_full_unstemmed Do preferential trade agreements favor the liberalization of trade with non-members? The case of the Andean Community
title_sort Do preferential trade agreements favor the liberalization of trade with non-members? The case of the Andean Community
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Castillo Thorne, Lakshmi Isabel
author Castillo Thorne, Lakshmi Isabel
author_facet Castillo Thorne, Lakshmi Isabel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Peru
Andean Community
Preferential Trade Agreements (PTA)
topic Peru
Andean Community
Preferential Trade Agreements (PTA)
description The theoretical literature has not reached a consensus on the effect of PTAs on multilateral liberalization. Empirical studies on this topic have been limited and, like theoretical studies, their results vary. The objective of this study is to find the effect of the Andean Community of Nations on the multilateral liberalization of Peru, by analyzing the variations in the Most Favored Nation (MFN) tariffs applied to non-members as a consequence of the preferential tariff reductions applied by Peru to the members of this PTA. The units of analysis are the tariff lines disaggregated to 6 digits of the Harmonized System for the period 1992-2010. Results show that, for the entire study period, the Andean Community generated a building block. We divided the sample into two sub-periods: 1992-2001 and 2002-2010. For the first period the results show a building block effect; however, for the second half the results changed, and a stumbling block is found. Other variables are also added to observe their effects on changes in external tariffs, such as preferential imports, which, when they present a sizeable preferential margin, cause a reduction in MFN tariffs for the entire sample. Based on these results, we found that the Andean Community did not represent an impediment to multilateral liberalization in Peru.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/22904
10.18800/economia.202102.002
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/22904
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/economia.202102.002
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/22904/23401
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Lakshmi Isabel Castillo Thorne
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Lakshmi Isabel Castillo Thorne
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Economía; Volume 44 Issue 88 (2021); 23-44
2304-4306
0254-4415
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1836736806513541120
score 13.871978
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).