Without giving in: shotgun clauses as an efficient solution mechanism in the event of a corporate deadlock

Descripción del Articulo

The corporate deadlock is not a situation that remains remote at all in Peruvian’s corporate practice. Despite that fact, Peruvian organizational law was proven to be insufficient to solve this problem. With that scenario, Peruvian corporate lawyers were in the need of seeking contractual s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Monsante Moy, Isabella
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28373
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/28373
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Liberalization
Privatization
Public services
Telecommunications
Electricity
Natural gas
Drinking water and sanitation
Bloqueo societario
Entrampamiento societario
Accionistas
Cláusulas shotgun
Convenio de accionistas
Contrato de compraventa de acciones
Junta general de accionistas
M&A
id REVPUCP_985ee2effa098b11af08c7a22324f314
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28373
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Without giving in: shotgun clauses as an efficient solution mechanism in the event of a corporate deadlockSin dar el brazo a torcer: cláusulas shotgun como mecanismo de solución eficiente ante un bloqueo societarioMonsante Moy, IsabellaLiberalizationPrivatizationPublic servicesTelecommunicationsElectricityNatural gasDrinking water and sanitationBloqueo societarioEntrampamiento societarioAccionistasCláusulas shotgunConvenio de accionistasContrato de compraventa de accionesJunta general de accionistasM&AThe corporate deadlock is not a situation that remains remote at all in Peruvian’s corporate practice. Despite that fact, Peruvian organizational law was proven to be insufficient to solve this problem. With that scenario, Peruvian corporate lawyers were in the need of seeking contractual solutions, importing Common Law conventional solutions; namely shotgun provisions that are the clauses mostly included in shareholders’ agreements to solve a possible corporate deadlock.This article aims to introduce the shotgun provisions as the most efficient solution before a corporate deadlock situation presented in a sociedad anónima cerrada and sociedad anónima (Peruvian regulated legal entities for private corporations) with shareholders who share equal participation in the Capital. The different possible solutions that the Peruvian General Corporation Law offers will be addressed and the viability of their application in corporate deadlocks will also be analyzed. It will be concluded that the most efficient solution to a corporate deadlock results in the use of the shotgun provisions contained in the shareholders’ agreement within a transaction in which a significant percentage of shares is acquired.El bloqueo societario es una situación que no resulta, en lo absoluto, ajena a la realidad societaria peruana. Sin embargo, nuestra legislación societaria actual resulta insuficiente para solucionar esta problemática. Ante ello, en la práctica, los abogados se han visto en la necesidad de buscar soluciones convencionales, importando cláusulas desde el Common Law; a saber, las cláusulas shotgun. El presente artículo tiene como objetivo presentar a las cláusulas shotgun pactadas en el marco de una compraventa de acciones con participación significativa como la solución más eficiente ante un bloqueo societario en sociedades anónimas cerradas y sociedades anónimas con socios paritarios. Se analizarán las posibles soluciones que brindaría la Ley General de Sociedades y se desarrollará la viabilidad de su aplicación en este tipo de situaciones. Se concluirá que el empleo de las cláusulas shotgun pactadas en convenios de accionistas en el marco de una operación de compraventa de acciones con participación significativa resulta ser el mecanismo más eficiente ante un bloqueo societario antes que una posible solución legal.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2023-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/28373THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 84 (2023): Derecho Corporativo y M&A; 243-2551810-9934reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/28373/26262info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/283732024-03-18T21:33:54Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Without giving in: shotgun clauses as an efficient solution mechanism in the event of a corporate deadlock
Sin dar el brazo a torcer: cláusulas shotgun como mecanismo de solución eficiente ante un bloqueo societario
title Without giving in: shotgun clauses as an efficient solution mechanism in the event of a corporate deadlock
spellingShingle Without giving in: shotgun clauses as an efficient solution mechanism in the event of a corporate deadlock
Monsante Moy, Isabella
Liberalization
Privatization
Public services
Telecommunications
Electricity
Natural gas
Drinking water and sanitation
Bloqueo societario
Entrampamiento societario
Accionistas
Cláusulas shotgun
Convenio de accionistas
Contrato de compraventa de acciones
Junta general de accionistas
M&A
title_short Without giving in: shotgun clauses as an efficient solution mechanism in the event of a corporate deadlock
title_full Without giving in: shotgun clauses as an efficient solution mechanism in the event of a corporate deadlock
title_fullStr Without giving in: shotgun clauses as an efficient solution mechanism in the event of a corporate deadlock
title_full_unstemmed Without giving in: shotgun clauses as an efficient solution mechanism in the event of a corporate deadlock
title_sort Without giving in: shotgun clauses as an efficient solution mechanism in the event of a corporate deadlock
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Monsante Moy, Isabella
author Monsante Moy, Isabella
author_facet Monsante Moy, Isabella
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Liberalization
Privatization
Public services
Telecommunications
Electricity
Natural gas
Drinking water and sanitation
Bloqueo societario
Entrampamiento societario
Accionistas
Cláusulas shotgun
Convenio de accionistas
Contrato de compraventa de acciones
Junta general de accionistas
M&A
topic Liberalization
Privatization
Public services
Telecommunications
Electricity
Natural gas
Drinking water and sanitation
Bloqueo societario
Entrampamiento societario
Accionistas
Cláusulas shotgun
Convenio de accionistas
Contrato de compraventa de acciones
Junta general de accionistas
M&A
description The corporate deadlock is not a situation that remains remote at all in Peruvian’s corporate practice. Despite that fact, Peruvian organizational law was proven to be insufficient to solve this problem. With that scenario, Peruvian corporate lawyers were in the need of seeking contractual solutions, importing Common Law conventional solutions; namely shotgun provisions that are the clauses mostly included in shareholders’ agreements to solve a possible corporate deadlock.This article aims to introduce the shotgun provisions as the most efficient solution before a corporate deadlock situation presented in a sociedad anónima cerrada and sociedad anónima (Peruvian regulated legal entities for private corporations) with shareholders who share equal participation in the Capital. The different possible solutions that the Peruvian General Corporation Law offers will be addressed and the viability of their application in corporate deadlocks will also be analyzed. It will be concluded that the most efficient solution to a corporate deadlock results in the use of the shotgun provisions contained in the shareholders’ agreement within a transaction in which a significant percentage of shares is acquired.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/28373
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/28373
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/28373/26262
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 84 (2023): Derecho Corporativo y M&A; 243-255
1810-9934
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846609502090035200
score 13.377223
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).