Formative Assessment - Construction for Collaborative Learning in Students of Art and Design
Descripción del Articulo
The objective of the experience that we are presenting is to point out some valuable accomplishments of students’ learning from the Geometric Design 1 and 2, DG courses in the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, PUCP’s, Art Faculty, which are built when learning evaluations take place, as well...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2015 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaspuc:article/12244 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/12244 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Art and design self-regulation group evaluation collaborative learning formative evaluation critical evaluation Arte y diseño autorregulación coevaluación aprendizaje colaborativo evaluación formativa evaluación crítica Arte e desenho a auto-regulação co-avaliação aprendizagem colaborativo avaliação formativa avaliação crítica |
id |
REVPUCP_93c24461b2118dff621685433dd2d2f6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistaspuc:article/12244 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Formative Assessment - Construction for Collaborative Learning in Students of Art and Design La evaluación formativa-colaborativa para la construcción del aprendizaje en los alumnos de arte y diseño A avaliação formativa-colaborativa para a construção de aprendizagem em estudantes de arte e design |
title |
Formative Assessment - Construction for Collaborative Learning in Students of Art and Design |
spellingShingle |
Formative Assessment - Construction for Collaborative Learning in Students of Art and Design Hermoza Samanez, Luz Marina Art and design self-regulation group evaluation collaborative learning formative evaluation critical evaluation Arte y diseño autorregulación coevaluación aprendizaje colaborativo evaluación formativa evaluación crítica Arte e desenho a auto-regulação co-avaliação aprendizagem colaborativo avaliação formativa avaliação crítica |
title_short |
Formative Assessment - Construction for Collaborative Learning in Students of Art and Design |
title_full |
Formative Assessment - Construction for Collaborative Learning in Students of Art and Design |
title_fullStr |
Formative Assessment - Construction for Collaborative Learning in Students of Art and Design |
title_full_unstemmed |
Formative Assessment - Construction for Collaborative Learning in Students of Art and Design |
title_sort |
Formative Assessment - Construction for Collaborative Learning in Students of Art and Design |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Hermoza Samanez, Luz Marina |
author |
Hermoza Samanez, Luz Marina |
author_facet |
Hermoza Samanez, Luz Marina |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Art and design self-regulation group evaluation collaborative learning formative evaluation critical evaluation Arte y diseño autorregulación coevaluación aprendizaje colaborativo evaluación formativa evaluación crítica Arte e desenho a auto-regulação co-avaliação aprendizagem colaborativo avaliação formativa avaliação crítica |
topic |
Art and design self-regulation group evaluation collaborative learning formative evaluation critical evaluation Arte y diseño autorregulación coevaluación aprendizaje colaborativo evaluación formativa evaluación crítica Arte e desenho a auto-regulação co-avaliação aprendizagem colaborativo avaliação formativa avaliação crítica |
description |
The objective of the experience that we are presenting is to point out some valuable accomplishments of students’ learning from the Geometric Design 1 and 2, DG courses in the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, PUCP’s, Art Faculty, which are built when learning evaluations take place, as well as how the approach of the formative evaluation supports the construction of an art student who is independent and self-directed, able to be conscious of his own progress, able to be self-critical of his/her artistic production, basing their self-evaluation on objective criteria that they themselves will discover and create. In addition, the formative approach of the evaluation promotes the formation of a strong character for critical evaluation, understood here as a specific evaluation strategy of art and design.Also we will reflect on the application of evaluation strategies aimed towards being collaborative; to give meaning to the method and to the intended contents of the learning while the student is acquiring procedure tools for the development of drawing techniques and for their own self-expression.This important learning is aimed at the autonomy of the student, because simultaneously to the conceptual area, diverse methodologies will be put in practice and students will experience strategies of collaborative learning andindividual aimed to «learning to learn» and «learning to be». |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-04-28 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/12244 10.18800/educacion.201501.003 |
url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/12244 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18800/educacion.201501.003 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/12244/12810 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Educación http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Educación http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Educación; Vol. 24 Núm. 46 (2015); 47-72 2304-4322 1019-9403 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
instacron_str |
PUCP |
institution |
PUCP |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1840900531345686528 |
spelling |
Formative Assessment - Construction for Collaborative Learning in Students of Art and DesignLa evaluación formativa-colaborativa para la construcción del aprendizaje en los alumnos de arte y diseñoA avaliação formativa-colaborativa para a construção de aprendizagem em estudantes de arte e designHermoza Samanez, Luz MarinaArt and designself-regulationgroup evaluationcollaborative learningformative evaluationcritical evaluationArte y diseñoautorregulacióncoevaluaciónaprendizaje colaborativoevaluación formativaevaluación críticaArte e desenhoa auto-regulaçãoco-avaliaçãoaprendizagem colaborativoavaliação formativaavaliação críticaThe objective of the experience that we are presenting is to point out some valuable accomplishments of students’ learning from the Geometric Design 1 and 2, DG courses in the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, PUCP’s, Art Faculty, which are built when learning evaluations take place, as well as how the approach of the formative evaluation supports the construction of an art student who is independent and self-directed, able to be conscious of his own progress, able to be self-critical of his/her artistic production, basing their self-evaluation on objective criteria that they themselves will discover and create. In addition, the formative approach of the evaluation promotes the formation of a strong character for critical evaluation, understood here as a specific evaluation strategy of art and design.Also we will reflect on the application of evaluation strategies aimed towards being collaborative; to give meaning to the method and to the intended contents of the learning while the student is acquiring procedure tools for the development of drawing techniques and for their own self-expression.This important learning is aimed at the autonomy of the student, because simultaneously to the conceptual area, diverse methodologies will be put in practice and students will experience strategies of collaborative learning andindividual aimed to «learning to learn» and «learning to be».Los objetivos de la experiencia que presentamos son: a) identificar los logros del aprendizaje de los alumnos del curso de Dibujo Geométrico (DG) 1 y 2 de la Facultad de Arte de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) construidos durante la evaluación del aprendizaje. Asimismo, b) demostrar cómo el enfoque de la evaluación formativa apoya la construcción de autonomía y autorregulación del estudiante de arte, capaz de ser consciente de su propio desarrollo y de hacer una autocrítica de su producción artística, basada en criterios objetivos que él mismo va a descubrir y conceptualizar, mientras va adquiriendo herramientas procedimentales y conceptuales para el desarrollo de técnicas de dibujo y de su propia expresión. De esta manera impulsa la formación de un carácter fuerte para la evaluación crítica, entendida aquí como una estrategia específica de evaluacióndel arte y el diseño.También reflexionaremos sobre la implementación de estrategias de evaluación orientadas hacia lo colaborativo, para darle significancia a la forma y a los contenidos destinados al aprendizaje, mientras el alumno adquiere herramientas para el desarrollo de técnicas de dibujo y de su propia expresión. Las estrategias de evaluación están orientadas a la autorregulación del alumno ya que simultáneamente al área conceptual, pondrán en práctica metodologías diversas y experimentarán estrategias de aprendizaje colaborativo e individual orientados alaprender a aprender y al aprender a ser.O objetivo da experiência que apresentamos é a de assinalar alguns lucros valiososda aprendizagem dos alunos do curso de Geometric Design 1 and 2, DG da faculdade de Arte da Pontificia Universidad Católica du Perú, PUCPque se constroem durante a avaliação da aprendizagem, assim como o enfoque da avaliação formativa apoia a construção de um estudante de arte autónoma e autónomo e autorregulado, capaz de ser consciente de seu próprio desenvolvimento, capaz de fazer uma autocrítica de sua produção artística, baseando-se em critérios objetivos que o mesmo vai descobrir e conceituar. Ademais o enfoque formativo da avaliação impulsiona à formação de um carácter forte para a avaliação crítica, aqui entendida como uma estratégia de avaliação específica da arte e design.Também reflexionaremos sobre a implementação de estratégias de avaliação orientadas para o colaborativo, para lhe dar significância à forma e aos conteúdos destinados à aprendizagem, enquanto o aluno vai adquirindo ferramentas processual para o desenvolvimento de técnicas de desenho e de sua própria expressão. Esta aprendizagem significativa está orientada à auto-regulação do aluno, pois simultaneamente à área conceptual, porão em prática metodologias diversas e experimentassem estratégias de aprendizagem colaborativo e individualorientados ao aprender a aprender e ao aprender a ser.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2015-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/1224410.18800/educacion.201501.003Educación; Vol. 24 Núm. 46 (2015); 47-722304-43221019-9403reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/12244/12810Derechos de autor 2016 Educaciónhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/122442025-08-19T15:43:34Z |
score |
13.361153 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).